Analysis of Industrial Transformation of Resource-based Towns in Qingyang City:Taking Qingcheng County as an Example

As people exploit resources vigorously,the amount of exploitable resources is decreasing.Due to long-term unsustainable development,resource-based cities and towns have encountered problems such as lack of resources and slow economic growth.Faced with the"resource curse"phenomenon,the transformation of resource-based cities and towns is an inevitable trend to achieve sustainable development.In this article,taking Qingcheng County as an example,by analyzing and researching the development status and existing problems of resource industry,the stage of industrial development in Qingcheng County is discussed to prove the importance of industrial transformation to the sustainable development of Qingcheng County,the experience and lessons that Qingcheng County can learn are summarized,and the objective laws and influencing factors in the acceleration of industrial transformation in Qingcheng County are analyzed in depth.Using SWOT analysis,specific countermeasures are explored to realize the industrial transformation of Qingcheng County.

World Economy and the Export Dependence of China's Textile Industry

In this paper,the current status of export dependence of China's textile industry and affecting factors are evaluated.A cointegration test for world economy and China's export of textile and apparel is conducted which suggests that a long-term cointegration relationship exists between the growth rate of the world economy and that of China's export of textiles and apparel.The world economy will enter a period of low-speed growth,and the growth rate of China's textile and apparel exports will slow down accordingly.On the other hand,China's domestic expenditures on textiles and apparel are expected to maintain robust growth.According to the trends of exports and domestic demand,the export dependence of China's textile industry will go down with fluctuations.The conclusion is useful to evaluating the performance of the textile industry and making relevant policies.

Path Dependent Historical Development at Turkish Automotive Industry

Turkey’s automotive industry has begun to occur at a much earlier date compared to other developing countries,through licensing agreements to establish automotive industrial facilities,by importing a kind of technology.Attempts have been made in order to produce the domestic automobile road providing sectoral developments could enter another technology pathway.Moreover,the inventor of a very early date in the Fordist production system,such as 1929 by Ford Motor Company with the license agreement,as if he could provide for setting up production facilities in Istanbul’s company,this bad experience has refrained for years from entering as a manufacturer Ford Motor Turkey market.Thus,while Turkey is an attractive market for car production,on the other hand,sufficient improvement over time in the production of trucks and other automotive products,such as buses has not been achieved.The 1929 experience seems to have been effective in terms of Turkey.Because,it was necessary to wait until 1971 for OYAK and TOFAŞto establish automobile assembly facility with license agreements.With the start of production of two automotive industry facilities,there has been a significant increase in sectoral production figures,but this increase trend has not been sufficiently supported by the government through the incentive system and in the late 1970s the production of the automotive industry has declined.For the first time in 1961,efforts were made to produce a completely domestic automobile,although the prototype of the revolutionary car was successfully produced,mass production could not be started.Subsequently,the production of the Anadol automobile for the second time was tried by means of technology transfer from multiple sources and the serial production of this automobile continued for a while.However,since fiber glass bodywork was used instead of hair bodywork and export opportunities could not be found,production was stopped completely in the end of 1980s.In the 1980s,automobile production continued in two assembly plants and product diversification was carried out to increase the production volume.In the 1990s,three new assembly facilities,Honda,Toyota and Hyundai,were established and the number of assembly production facilities in the country increased to five and technology loyalty based on technology imports continued.Until 2014,the automotive industry continued to consist of five automobile assembly plants and other automotive products assembly plants.In 2015,it was announced to the public that a new domestic car prototype was produced.It was announced that the project will start mass production in 2019.However,it was determined that the prototype would be re-manufactured at the end of 2019 by making changes in the project and that it would be possible to start mass production in 2022.Thus,it is understood that the efforts to start mass production since 2015 can be concluded in 2022,i.e.7 years after the first prototype was produced.It can 161produce prototypes in a short period of four months in Turkey in 1961,as evidenced by an indication of the dependency on a long time wasting which is not technology importation pathway,such as five years.How to break the path of devotion demonstrates that it is a difficult job.Path dependency is thought to result from the education system.

Historical Development in the Automotive Industries of Argentina and Turkey

It is possible to say that the automotive industries of Argentina,Brazil,and Turkey are each developed as an assembly industry and show great similarities to each other in this context.Since the 1980s,the development direction of the world automotive industry has been trying to make the country’s investment environment attractive for foreign international companies to produce in their countries in all three countries.However,with the 1980s,their adaptation to the flexible production system and other new technologies being implemented in the Japanese automotive industry took time,meaning that the learning time took a long time,and local contribution rates fell.This has made the slow development mechanism that has been going on since the past work even slower,and they have suffered the punishment for not being able to develop technologies in all three countries by falling behind in the automotive industry.In the 2000s,with technological advances in electric vehicles,when the use of electric vehicles began to become widespread,we can say that all three countries began to experience a new adaptation problem in the automotive industry more severely.In Turkey,this problem was experienced with all its weight along with the other country;in 2006,the policy of attracting foreign investment to the automotive industry was partially abandoned and the approach to producing domestic cars began to be considered,and in 2011,a decision was made to produce domestic cars.As of December 2019,a prototype of the domestic car has been produced by the automobile initiative group of Turkey and work has started for mass production.Thus,the problem of adaptation to the production of electric vehicles was desired to be overcome by moving to a new stage in the path of technology development.The South Korean automotive industry used this approach in the 1980s and was successful and soon gained the ability to develop technology.In order to see the success of the application of this method in Turkey,it is thought that it is necessary to wait for the result of the domestic car project.

Historical Development in Brazil and Turkish Automotive Industry

It is possible to say that the automotive industries of Brazil and Turkey have developed as assembly industries and showed great similarities in this context.In the 1980s,in line with the development direction of the world’s automotive industry,Turkey tried to make the country’s investment environment attractive for foreign international companies to produce in their country.We can say that while Brazil created the state incentive system in order to attract foreign investments to its country since the 1950s,it tried to increase its dose with the 1990s.Although,like Turkey,Brazil has thought of producing local cars,the difference between Turkey and Brazil is that it has considered exporting and was able to export not only to South America,but also to African countries.Another difference of Brazil is that it has implemented incentive policies for the automotive sector and has been able to rearrange its incentive elements according to changing conditions.Turkey,on the other hand,has decided to return from the policy of attracting foreign investments to its country since 2006,and in 2011,it was decided to produce domestic automobiles.As of December 2019,a prototype of the domestic car was produced by Turkey’s Automobile Initiative Group and work for mass production began.Thus,the problem of adaptation to electric vehicle production was tried to be overcome by moving to a new phase in the way of technology development.This approach was used by the South Korean automotive industry in the 1980s and it was successful and technology development capability was gained in a short time.In order to see the success of the application of this method in Turkey,it is thought that it is necessary to wait for the result of the domestic automobile project.Brazil,on the other hand,was able to rank high in world automotive industry production with its sectoral incentive policies that can adapt to changing conditions and its structure that considers exports from the past,while Turkey lagged behind.

Historical Development in Brazil and Turkish Automotive Industry and Innovation Policies

It is possible to say that the automotive industries of Brazil and Turkey have developed as assembly industries and show great similarities in this context.In the 1980s,in line with the development direction of the world’s automotive industry,Turkey tried to make the country’s investment environment attractive for foreign international companies to produce in the country.We can say that while Brazil created the state incentive system in order to attract foreign investments to its country since the 1950s,it tried to increase its dose with the 1990s.Although,like Turkey,Brazil has thought of producing local cars,the difference between Turkey and Brazil is that it has considered exporting and was able to export not only to South America,but also to African countries.Another difference of Brazil is that it has implemented incentive policies for the automotive sector and has been able to rearrange its incentive elements according to changing conditions.Turkey,on the other hand,has decided to return from the policy of attracting foreign investments to its country since 2006,and in 2011,it decided to produce domestic automobiles.As of December 2019,a prototype of the domestic car was produced by Turkey’s Automobile Initiative Group and work for mass production began.Thus,the problem of adaptation to electric vehicle production was tried to be overcome by moving to a new phase in the way of technology development.This approach was used by the South Korean automotive industry in the 1980s and it was successful and technology development capability was gained in a short time.In order to see the success of the application of this method in Turkey,it is thought that it is necessary to wait for the result of the domestic automobile project.Brazil,on the other hand,was able to rank high in world automotive industry production with its sectoral incentive policies that can adapt to changing conditions and its structure that considers exports from the past,while Turkey lagged behind.

我国钴资源产业发展现状、问题与对策

钴金属是新能源行业发展所必需的材料。根据钴资源产业最新数据,本文通过分析全球及我国钴资源禀赋、钴精矿与精炼钴供需情况和钴资源产业政策,得出我国钴资源产业发展存在的问题为:我国钴矿资源极其稀缺,但却是全球第一大精炼钴生产国和消费国;超高的对外依存度叠加不可替代的单一进口来源,使得我国钴资源保障面临重大隐患。针对上述问题,提出下列钴资源保障对策:加强我国钴矿资源有效增储举措;拓展多元化钴资源进口渠道,确保稳定获取境外钴矿资源;实施扶持性政策,帮扶海外中资企业钴资源平稳产出;建立钴资源储备体系,提高钴资源保障能力;提升钴资源综合利用技术水平,增加可利用钴资源量;重视海底铁锰结核(结壳)等潜在钴资源开采方案研究。

中国乳制品加工业集聚水平与空间集聚演化特征研究

借助区位熵指数、空间自相关模型、标准差椭圆等方法分析2014~2021年我国乳制品加工业空间集聚特征、空间依赖性与动态演化特征。结果表明,我国乳制品加工业呈现相对平稳的集聚态势,产业布局呈现出与原料奶基地的布局相衔接的合理布局;新型冠状病毒感染疫情降低了乳制品行业集聚程度,但隔离政策的取消和行业振兴计划的提出减缓了这种下降趋势;我国乳制品加工业在空间上形成以晋鲁豫为核心的一体化发展格局,尽管内蒙古、黑龙江、宁夏的乳制品加工业集聚态势显著,却未对相邻省份形成有效辐射带动作用;整体空间分布格局以“东北-西南”方向为主导,产业重心呈现向西移动趋势,空间溢出效应有减弱趋势。

基于组织-技术依存网络的技术融合机理

技术融合能够显著提高企业的创新能力,对技术融合机理的深入探索有助于选择合适的创新伙伴和融合技术。构建依存型网络分析模型,探究技术特征和技术依附的组织特征与技术融合的关系,并对人工智能产业进行实证研究。研究表明:吸收能力强或扩散能力强的技术容易吸收或流向其他技术;技术成熟度高、技术邻近性强的两种技术容易发生双向流动;被多个组织拥有的共性技术不容易吸收其他技术,但容易流向其他技术,单个组织内拥有的技术间容易发生双向流动。

双重逻辑下联盟价值创造路径研究——基于模糊集的定性比较分析

产业技术创新战略联盟作为中国实现创新突围的重要环节在激烈的外部竞争中日趋重要,联盟内成员的依赖关系治理和联盟价值创造受到越来越多的关注。既有研究主要从单一视角来探索联盟价值创造的影响因素,往往得出差异显著甚至互相矛盾的结果。事实上,联盟成员依赖关系中的双重逻辑共现,在嵌入与权力视角下对于理想的治理机制有选择偏向性,要靠整体性思维框架来思考价值创造。鉴于此,本文从组态视角出发,基于科技部首批试点联盟评估问卷和联盟评分动态追踪数据,利用模糊集定性比较分析方法,识别出联盟处理成员间依赖和提高价值创造的路径。研究发现,成员依赖的双重逻辑与治理机制相互组合形成实现联盟高价值创造的3种路径;依赖关系中嵌入逻辑与权力逻辑共存,冲突协调机制在权力逻辑占据主导地位时发挥了重要作用;联盟非高价值创造并非高价值创造的对立面,联盟运行机制的不完善是非高价值创造的重要因素。本研究推动了资源依赖理论在联盟价值创造研究中的应用,为通过非对称性的殊途同归组合思路达成联盟高价值创造的目标提供了决策支撑。

中国制造业对美国中间品供应链依赖效应研究

本研究利用经济合作与发展组织(OECD)最新公布的2016年区分企业所有权性质的国家间投入产出表,基于反事实分析方法模拟测算美国电子信息行业和全行业不同程度切断对中国的中间品供应而给产业链下游部门带来的产出影响,以此分析中国制造业对美国中间品的供应链依赖效应,同时警示中美脱钩所引致的中国制造业供应链断裂风险。

城乡要素共生与乡村产业融合发展:基于依存条件和影响效应的多案例研究

乡村产业融合是中国推进农业发展方式转型和实现乡村共同富裕的重要路径。在城乡要素市场分割的背景下,城乡要素共生与乡村产业融合之间需要协同匹配。通过多案例研究,深入分析城乡要素共生模式的差异性及其对乡村产业融合的影响。研究发现:从各模式的共性看,城乡要素共生以要素质参量兼容、共生频率深化、共生界面稳定为前提,最终实现乡村产业融合发展;从依存条件的差异性看,要素属性、交易维度和主体特质的差异影响共生界面的生成,形成契约性共生、一体化共生、平台型共生三种类型;从影响效应的差异性看,共生关系的产业跨度、关系形态和关系结构影响乡村产业融合的模式,形成纵向延伸融合、横向交叉融合、产业链网融合三种模式。

数字经济对绿色全要素生产率的影响研究

在中国式现代化背景下,如何促进人与自然和谐共生、破解绿色发展困境已然成为当前亟待解决的问题。为此,基于2011—2020年我国223个地级及以上城市的面板数据,实证分析数字经济对绿色全要素生产率的影响及作用机制。研究结果表明:数字经济能够显著提高绿色全要素生产率,且该结论具有稳健性;数字经济对绿色全要素生产率的作用效果存在时间异质性、区域异质性和人口异质性;数字经济能够通过改进绿色技术与提升绿色效率、降低资源型产业依赖程度和缓解资源错配程度来提高绿色全要素生产率;数字经济对绿色全要素生产率的提高作用会产生正向的空间溢出效应,提升邻近城市的绿色全要素生产率。据此,应加快推动数字化发展进程、制定差异化数字经济发展战略、引导资源型产业绿色化发展、完善资源要素配置机制,以期提高绿色全要素生产率、深入贯彻绿色发展理念。

状态相关衰落信道下异构工业物联网系统的最优无线控制

随着工业4.0的发展,移动智能体系统(Mobile agent system,MAS)与多回路无线控制系统(Wireless control system,WCS)被部署到工厂中,构成异构工业物联网(Industrial internet of things,IIoT)系统,协作执行智能制造任务.在协作过程中,MAS与WCS紧密耦合,导致状态相关衰落,两者性能相互制约.为解决这一问题,研究异构工业物联网系统的最优控制问题,满足WCS控制性能约束与MAS安全生产约束的同时,最小化系统平均通信成本.首先,利用有限域系统描述MAS在不同阴影衰落程度工作区间的转移,刻画MAS与WCS耦合下的状态相关衰落信道模型.基于此,利用矩阵半张量积理论,通过构建受限跟随者状态转移图(Follower state transition graph,FSTG),建立最优控制问题可行性图判据,给出关于受限集合镇定的充分必要条件.其次,基于加权跟随者状态转移图的最小平均环理论,建立领航-跟随MAS最优控制序列的构造算法,并证明其最优性.最后,通过仿真验证算法的有效性.

中国装备制造业贸易依存度、产业升级与绿色发展的动态关系——基于面板数据的PVAR模型分析

论文以2006—2020年中国30个省份的面板数据为样本,构建PVAR模型,引入脉冲响应函数,从静态和动态视角分析三者间的相互影响。研究结果表明:(1)贸易依存度、进口依存度、出口依存度对产业升级有短期促进的作用和长期抑制的作用,对绿色发展有长期的抑制作用。(2)产业升级对贸易依存度、进口依存度、出口依存度以及绿色发展有长期的抑制作用。(3)绿色发展对贸易依存度、进口依存度、出口依存度有短期促进的作用和长期抑制的作用,对产业升级有长期的促进作用。基于研究结论,进而提出优化装备制造业对外贸易模式、鼓励装备制造业向高端化绿色化升级、持续深化绿色发展理念的建议。

科学-技术关联对高技术产业创新绩效的影响研究——对外技术依存度的调节作用

高技术产业是推动创新型国家建设的支柱产业,如何提升高技术产业创新绩效是优化经济结构、提高国家产业竞争力亟须解决的关键问题。高技术产业发展离不开科技协同创新的支撑,本研究以中国高技术产业为样本,采用科学论文与专利文献代表科学与技术,提出面向特定产业的科学论文与专利文献映射方法,从知识内容关联层面测度中国高技术产业科学-技术关联程度,利用面板模型实证分析科学-技术关联对中国高技术产业创新绩效的影响机制,探究对外技术依存度在科学-技术关联与高技术产业创新绩效关联关系间的调节作用。研究结果表明:①17个中国高技术产业的科学-技术关联程度均相对较低,不同领域高技术产业的科学-技术关联演化特征存在差异;②科学-技术关联与高技术产业创新绩效之间呈现倒U形关系;③对外技术依存度对科学-技术关联与高技术产业创新绩效的倒U形关系具有负向调节作用。本研究可以为政府部门制定科技创新发展规划和技术引进政策、中国高技术产业关联科研机构和企业选择并调整创新方向提供参考。

企业ESG表现的产业链溢出效应研究

企业如何释放ESG优势,促进合作伙伴协调发展?既有研究没有答案。本文利用2009-2022年沪深A股1 576家上市公司数据,从产业链企业关联视角,实证检验了上下游企业ESG表现对焦点企业ESG表现的溢出效应及作用机制。研究发现:在产业链企业组合中企业ESG表现存在上下游溢出效应,且绿色创新关联度越大、产业链依赖度越强、企业战略差异度越小的产业链企业组合,其产业链溢出效应越显著。进一步通过区分上游和下游企业在环境、社会责任和公司治理表现的产业链溢出方向发现:上游供应商主动绿色创新的产业链溢出效应大于被动绿色创新;企业在社会责任方面表现“退步”产生的负向溢出效应远大于“进步”产生的正向溢出效应;下游客户选择灵活型企业战略风格能够释放出更强的产业链驱动力。本文的研究为探索企业可持续发展提供了新视角,为推动全产业链高质量发展提供了经验证据。

Analysis of CO2 Emissions and the Mechanism of the Industrial Enterprises above Designated Size（IEDS） in Resource-based Cities by Application of Geographical Detector Technology

Resource-based cities are the most important players in responding to climate change and achieving low carbon development in China.An analysis of relevant data(such as the energy consumption)showed an inter-city differentiation of CO2 emissions from energy consumption,and suggested an influence of the Industrial Enterprises above Designated Size(IEDS)in resource-based industrial cities at the prefecture level and above in different regions.Then by geographical detector technology,the sizes of each influencing mechanism on CO2 emissions from energy consumption of the IEDS were probed.This analysis showed that significant spatial differences exist for CO2 emissions from energy consumption and revealed several factors which influence the IEDS in resource-based cities.(1)In terms of unit employment,Eastern and Western resource-based cities are above the overall level of all resource-based cities;and only Coal resource-based cities far exceeded the overall level among all of the cities in the analysis.(2)In terms of unit gross industrial output value,the Eastern,Central and Western resources-based cities are all above the overall level for all the cities.Here also,only Coal resource-based cities far exceeded the overall level of all resources-based cities.Economic scale and energy structure are the main factors influencing CO2 emissions from energy consumption of the IEDS in resource-based cities.The factors influencing CO2 emissions in different regions and types of resource-based cities show significant spatial variations,and the degree of influence that any given factor exerts varies among different regions and types of resource-based cities.Therefore,individualized recommendations should be directed to different regions and types of resource-based cities,so that the strategies and measures of industrial low carbon and transformation should vary greatly according to the specific conditions that exist in each city.

对外直接投资对工业绿色转型的双重效应——基于双边随机前沿模型的分析

工业绿色转型是实现新型工业化的重要条件,也是建设工业强国的关键环节。为进一步识别工业绿色转型的新动力,厘清对外直接投资对工业绿色转型的影响效应与跃迁趋势,基于中国30个省份2004—2020年的面板数据,该研究构建双边随机前沿模型测算了对外直接投资对工业绿色转型的溢出效应、挤出效应以及净效应,并结合Markov链方法预测对外直接投资对工业绿色转型净效应影响的跃迁趋势。结果表明:①对外直接投资对工业绿色转型具有溢出和挤出双重效应,溢出效应使工业绿色转型提高了31.472%,挤出效应使工业绿色转型降低了11.739%,二者的净效应使工业绿色转型实际提高了19.733%。②对外直接投资对工业绿色转型的溢出效应占主导地位,但在时间和空间上具有异质性,剔除挤出效应的影响,净效应在2004—2020年间呈现出先升后降的倒“U”型特征,并在中部最大、东部最小。③生产要素由资源依赖向技术依赖的优化调整能够与对外直接投资形成协作适配,促进工业绿色转型。④对外直接投资对工业绿色转型的净效应有一定程度的稳定性,拥有长期增长趋势,但也有跌落的风险。因此,未来应持续扩大对外直接投资规模、优化投资结构、推进国际科技合作,通过强化对外直接投资的溢出效应和削弱其挤出效应助力工业绿色转型。

面向档案事业现代化的我国综合型档案服务企业管理模式分析

在当前国家高度重视数字化、信息化发展的战略背景下,档案服务企业迎来了前所未有的发展机遇。本文通过对六家具有代表性的档案服务企业进行深入研究,提炼出分析综合型档案服务企业管理模式的八个维度,分别是价值主张、战略选择、价值网络、发展资源、关键活动、内部管理、经济效益和社会效益,发现基于价值要素的综合型档案服务企业管理模式大致可分为价值引领型、战略驱动型以及关系依赖型三种模式,并提出针对综合型档案服务企业的管理建议,以期为我国档案服务事业现代化发展提供参考。