In the world of science, recognition of scientific performance is strongly correlated with publication visibility and interest generated among other researchers, which is evident by downloads and citations. A publishe...In the world of science, recognition of scientific performance is strongly correlated with publication visibility and interest generated among other researchers, which is evident by downloads and citations. A published paper’s number of downloads and citations are the best indices of its importance and are useful measures of the researchers’ performance. However, the published paper should be valuated and indexed independently, and the prestige of the journal in which it is published should not influence the value of the paper itself. By participating in and presenting at congresses and international meetings, scientists strongly increase the visibility of their results and recognition of their research;this also promotes their publications. Status in Research Gate (RG), the so-called RG Score, the Percentile, and the h-index give researchers feedback about their performance, or their place and prestige within the scientific community. RG has become an excellent tool for disseminating scientific results and connecting researchers worldwide. RG also allows researchers to present achievements other than publications (e.g., membership in recognized associations such as the American Chemist Society, a biography in Marquis Who’s Who in the World, awards received, and/or ongoing projects). This paper discusses questions regarding how the RG Score, Percentile, and h-index are calculated, whether these methods are correct, and alternative criteria. RG also lists papers with falsified results and the journals that publish them. Thus, it may be appropriate to reduce the indices for such journals, authors, and the institutions with which these authors are affiliated.展开更多
现阶段医学学术型硕士研究生培养的教学模式不能满足当今社会对科研人才的需求,亟需作出改革。以探究为基础的教学法(research based learning,RBL)联合研讨会(Seminar)教学法的教学模式,强调在教师引导下,构建开放式、学生主动参与并...现阶段医学学术型硕士研究生培养的教学模式不能满足当今社会对科研人才的需求,亟需作出改革。以探究为基础的教学法(research based learning,RBL)联合研讨会(Seminar)教学法的教学模式,强调在教师引导下,构建开放式、学生主动参与并开展讨论的学习模式。首先,高校可围绕当前研究热点设置相关课程或者举办专题讲座,开拓学生思维,提高学生科研能力;其次,教师可以引导学生有效利用网络数据库发现问题以及充分探讨和交流实验过程中遇到的诸多问题;再次,针对科研论文写作,需改变传统的大学英语写作教学模式;最后,通过阶段性考核、成果汇报、问卷调查等方式对RBL联合Seminar教学法进行质量评价。通过RBL联合Seminar教学法的教学模式,医学学术型硕士研究生能够积极、主动地发现问题,通过和教师、同学之间讨论交流分析问题,并运用合适的实验方法解决问题,从而培养严谨的科研思维,提高学生的创新能力。展开更多
文摘In the world of science, recognition of scientific performance is strongly correlated with publication visibility and interest generated among other researchers, which is evident by downloads and citations. A published paper’s number of downloads and citations are the best indices of its importance and are useful measures of the researchers’ performance. However, the published paper should be valuated and indexed independently, and the prestige of the journal in which it is published should not influence the value of the paper itself. By participating in and presenting at congresses and international meetings, scientists strongly increase the visibility of their results and recognition of their research;this also promotes their publications. Status in Research Gate (RG), the so-called RG Score, the Percentile, and the h-index give researchers feedback about their performance, or their place and prestige within the scientific community. RG has become an excellent tool for disseminating scientific results and connecting researchers worldwide. RG also allows researchers to present achievements other than publications (e.g., membership in recognized associations such as the American Chemist Society, a biography in Marquis Who’s Who in the World, awards received, and/or ongoing projects). This paper discusses questions regarding how the RG Score, Percentile, and h-index are calculated, whether these methods are correct, and alternative criteria. RG also lists papers with falsified results and the journals that publish them. Thus, it may be appropriate to reduce the indices for such journals, authors, and the institutions with which these authors are affiliated.
文摘现阶段医学学术型硕士研究生培养的教学模式不能满足当今社会对科研人才的需求,亟需作出改革。以探究为基础的教学法(research based learning,RBL)联合研讨会(Seminar)教学法的教学模式,强调在教师引导下,构建开放式、学生主动参与并开展讨论的学习模式。首先,高校可围绕当前研究热点设置相关课程或者举办专题讲座,开拓学生思维,提高学生科研能力;其次,教师可以引导学生有效利用网络数据库发现问题以及充分探讨和交流实验过程中遇到的诸多问题;再次,针对科研论文写作,需改变传统的大学英语写作教学模式;最后,通过阶段性考核、成果汇报、问卷调查等方式对RBL联合Seminar教学法进行质量评价。通过RBL联合Seminar教学法的教学模式,医学学术型硕士研究生能够积极、主动地发现问题,通过和教师、同学之间讨论交流分析问题,并运用合适的实验方法解决问题,从而培养严谨的科研思维,提高学生的创新能力。
