-
题名PPH联合外剥内扎术治疗重度环状混合痔的疗效观察
被引量:2
- 1
-
-
作者
张荣斌
-
机构
广西桂林市荔浦县人民医院普通外科
-
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2017年第7期29-31,共3页
-
文摘
为观察PPH联合外剥内扎术治疗重度环状混合痔的临床疗效,将i00例重度环状混合痔患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组50例。治疗组采用PPH联合外剥内扎术治疗,对照组采用分段内扎外剥术治疗。所有患者随访4~6个月。对住院时间、住院总费用、术后疼痛、肛缘水肿、创面愈合时间、皮赘形成、复发进行对比分析。结果显示,与对照组相比,治疗组在住院时间、术后疼痛、创面愈合时间、复发方面优于对照组(P≤0.05),2组在术后肛缘水肿及皮赘形成方面比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。但住院总费用较对照组偏高(P〈0.05)。结果表明,PPH联合外剥内扎术治疗重度环状混合痔较传统分段内扎外剥术在缩短住院时间、减轻术后疼痛、缩短创面愈合时间、防止复发方面有明显优势,可作为重度环状混合痔的替代手术,但住院总费用较高。
-
关键词
重度环状混合痔
吻合器痔上黏膜环切术
外剥内扎术
-
Keywords
This study was to observe the clinical effect of severe circumferential mixed hemorrhoids treated with ppH plus external dissection & internal ligation, randomly divided 100 cases of this hemorrhoids into treatment group and control one,50 cases for each
the former received ppH plus external dissections& internal ligation, the latter received segmentally internal ligation 8. external dissection
all the 100 cases were followed-up for 4-6 months
then their hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, postoperative pain, ano-edge edema, wound-surface healing time and skin tag formation, as well as postoperative recurrence status were compared and analysed. as results, in hospital stay, and postoperative pain, wound-surface healing time, as well as postoperative recurrence the former was all superior to the latter ( p ≤0.05), in ano-edge edema, in skin tag formation there was no statistical difference between two groups ( p 〉0.05), but the total hospitalization cost of the former was higher than that of the latter ( p 〈0.05). results show that above combination procedure has such advantages as shortening hospital stay, reducing postoperative pain, shortening wound-surface healing time, as well as less postoperative recurrence, but total hospitalization cost is higher. key words severe circumferential mixed hemorrhoids
ppH
External dissection 8* internal ligation
-
分类号
R657.18
[医药卫生—外科学]
-