Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of gemcitabine and concurrent three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) . Methods: From April 2002 to Jun...Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of gemcitabine and concurrent three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) . Methods: From April 2002 to June 2005, 38 pa-tients with inoperable stage III NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine and 3D-CRT simultaneously. Chemotherapy consisted of intravenously gemcitabine 350 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36. 3D-CRT was delivered up to a total dose of 60–64 Gy with a 2.0 Gy dose fraction per day, 5 days per week. Results: The overall response rates of primary tumor and mediastinum metastatic node were 86.8% (33/38) and 90.6% (29/32) respectively, and 91.7% (22/24) and 78.6% (11/14) for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma respectively. The acute side effects of patients were mostly myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, radiation-induced esophagitis and pneumonitis (RTOG I/II), however, all of them were cured. Conclusion: Con-current application of gemcitabine and 3D-CRT can improve the overall response rate for locally advanced NSCLC without aggravating the side effects.展开更多
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and toxic effect of the 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3DCRT)for non- small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). METHODS Fifty-two patients with the Stage-I and IV NSCLC w...OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and toxic effect of the 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3DCRT)for non- small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). METHODS Fifty-two patients with the Stage-I and IV NSCLC were treated with 3DCRT.Cross analysis of the clinical data was conducted in the comparison between the 52 cases with 3DCRT and the other 50 cases with the conventional radiation therapy (CRT).In the 3DCRT group,only the primary tumor and positive lymph-node draining area were included in the clinical target area,setting 4 to 6 coplanar or non-coplanar irradiation fields,with 2 Gy or 3 Gy/fraction,1 fraction a day and 5 fractions per week. The total dose ranged from a test dose(DT)of 66 Gy to 72 Gy.In the CRT group,the field area contained the primary tumor plus the homolateral hilum of the lung,the mediastinum superior or hol-mediastinum,and opposed anteroposterior irradiation.When the dosage reached DT 36~40 Gy,an oblique portal administered radiation was conducted in order to avoid injuring the spinal cord. The DT was 1.8~2.0 Gy/fraction,1 fraction a day,5 fractions per week,with a total dose of 60 Gy to 70 Gy. RESULTS The therapeutic effect(CR+PR)was 90.4% in the 3DCRT group,and was 72% in the CRT group.There was statistically significant difference between the two groups,P<0.01. There was a clinical symptom improvement attained by 96.5% and 86.4% respectively in the two groups,and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups,P<0.01.The 6-month, 1 and 2-year overall survival rates were 92.3%,75.0% and 42.3% in the 3DCRT group,and 76%,60% and 30% in the CRT group, respectively.There was a significant difference in the 6-month overall survival rate between the groups,P<0.05.There was no obvious significant difference in the 1 and 2-year overall survival rates between the two groups,P>0.05.The toxic reaction was 12.5% and 23.7% respectively in the 3DCRT and CRT groups. Acute radioactive esophagitis and leucopenia were markedly lower in the 3DCRT group than in the CRT group.There was a statistically significant difference between the groups,P<0.05.No toxic reaction of Stage-Ⅲand over was found in the 3DCRT group during radiation therapy. CONCLUSION The 3DCRT method has a satisfactory short- term efficacy and improvement of clinical symptoms in treating NSCLC,with a mild toxic reaction and good tolerance in patients. It can be used for enhancing the tumor-control rate and bettering the quality of life.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the influences of motion artifacts on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction volume and conformal radiotherapy planning. Methods:A phantom which can mimic the clip motion of lung tumor along th...Objective:To investigate the influences of motion artifacts on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction volume and conformal radiotherapy planning. Methods:A phantom which can mimic the clip motion of lung tumor along the cranial-caudal direction is constructed by step motor, small ball of polyethylene and potato. Ten different scan protocols were set and CT data of the phantom were acquired by using a commercial GE LightSpeed16 CT scanner. The 3D reconstruction of the CT data was implemented by adopting volume-rendering technology of GE AdvantageSim 6.0 system. The reconstructed volumes of each target in different scan protocols were measured through 3D measuring tools. Thus, relative deviations of the reconstruction volumes between moving targets and static ones were determined. The three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plans and conformal fields were created and compared for a static/moving target with the WiMRT treatment planning system (TPS). Results:For a static target, there was no obvious difference among the 3D reconstruction volumes when the CT data were acquired with different pitches and slices. The appearance of 3D reconstruction volume and 3D conformal field of a moving target was quite different from that of static one. The maximum relative deviation is nearly 90% for a moving target scanned with different scan protocols. The relative deviations are variable among the different targets, about from -39.8% to 89.5% for a smaller target and from -18.4% to 20.5% for a larger one. Conclusion:The motion artifacts have great effects on 3D-CRT planning and reconstruction volume, which will greatly induce distorted conformal radiation fields and false DVHs for a moving target.展开更多
Introduction: Radiation therapy after breast surgery is an integral part of the treatment of early breast cancer. The goal of radiation therapy is to achieve the best possible coverage of the planning target volume (P...Introduction: Radiation therapy after breast surgery is an integral part of the treatment of early breast cancer. The goal of radiation therapy is to achieve the best possible coverage of the planning target volume (PTV), while reducing the dose to organs at risk (OARs) which are normal tissues whose sensitivity to irradiation could cause damage that can lead to modification of the treatment plan. In the last decade, radiation oncologist started to use the Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for irradiating the breast, in order to achieve better dose distribution and target dose to the PTV and OAR. The aim of this study is to compare 2 external radiotherapy techniques (VMAT vs 3D) for patients with node-positive left breast cancer. Patients and Methods: We randomly selected 10 cases of postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer in our hospital. The patients are all female, the average age was 45.4 years old, and the primary lesions are left breast. The ANOVA test was used to compare the mean difference between subgroups, and the p value Results: Dose volume histogram (DVH) was used to analyze each evaluation dose of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Compared to 3DCRT plans, VMAT provided more uniform coverage to the breast and regional lymph nodes. The max point dose for tVMAT was lower on average (106.4% for VMAT versus 109% for 3DCRT). OAR sparing was improved with tVMAT, with a lower average V17Gy for the left lung (27.91% for VMAT versus 30.04% for 3DCRT, p and lower for V28Gy (13.75% for VMAT versus 22.34% for 3DCRT, p = 0.01). We also found a lower V35Gy for the heart on VMAT plan (p = 0.02). On the contrary, dose of contralateral breast was lower in 3DCRT than VMAT (0.59 Gy vs 3.65 Gy, p = 0.00). Conclusion: The both types of plans can meet the clinical dosimetry demands of postoperative radiotherapy for left breast cancer. The VMAT plan has a better conformity, but 3CDRT can provide a lower dose to the contralateral organs (breast and lung) to avoid the risk of secondary cancers.展开更多
AIM:To establish the feasibility of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy(SMART) in esophageal cancer(EC).METHODS:Computed tomography(CT)datasets of 10patients with upper or middle thoracic squamous cel...AIM:To establish the feasibility of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy(SMART) in esophageal cancer(EC).METHODS:Computed tomography(CT)datasets of 10patients with upper or middle thoracic squamous cell EC undergoing chemoradiotherapy were used to generate SMART,conventionally-fractionated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3DCRT)and intensity-modulated radiation therapy(cf-IMRT)plans,respectively.The gross target volume(GTV)of the esophagus,positive regional lymph nodes(LN),and suspected lymph nodes(LN±)were contoured for each patient.The clinical target volume(CTV)was delineated with 2-cm longitudinal and 0.5-to 1.0-cm radial margins with respect to the GTV and with 0.5-cm uniform margins for LN and LN(±).For the SMART plans,there were two planning target volumes(PTVs):PTV66=(GTV+LN)+0.5 cm and PTV54=CTV+0.5 cm.For the 3DCRT and cfIMRT plans,there was only a single PTV:PTV60=CTV+0.5 cm.The prescribed dose for the SMART plans was 66 Gy/30 F to PTV66 and 54 Gy/30 F to PTV54.The dose prescription to the PTV60 for both the 3DCRT and cf-IMRT plans was set to 60 Gy/30 F.All the plans were generated on the Eclipse 10.0 treatment planning system.Fulfillment of the dose criteria for the PTVs received the highest priority,followed by the spinal cord,heart,and lungs.The dose-volume histograms were compared.RESULTS:Clinically acceptable plans were achieved for all the SMART,cf-IMRT,and 3DCRT plans.Compared with the 3DCRT plans,the SMART plans increased the dose delivered to the primary tumor(66Gy vs 60 Gy),with improved sparing of normal tissues in all patients.The Dmax of the spinal cord,V20 of the lungs,and Dmean and V50 of the heart for the SMART and 3DCRT plans were as follows:38.5±2.0 vs 44.7±0.8(P=0.002),17.1±4.0 vs 25.8±5.0(P=0.000),14.4±7.5 vs 21.4±11.1(P=0.000),and 4.9±3.4vs 12.9±7.6(P=0.000),respectively.In contrast to the cf-IMRT plans,the SMART plans permitted a simultaneous dose escalation(6 Gy)to the primary tumor while demonstrating a significant trend of a lower irradiation dose to all organs at risk except the spinal cord,for which no significant difference was found.CONCLUSION:SMART offers the potential for a 6Gy simultaneous escalation in the irradiation dose delivered to the primary tumor of EC and improves the sparing of normal tissues.展开更多
Introduction: In medulloblastoma patients craniospinal irradiation is an important element the treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of absorbed dose to organs at risk using the hybrid intensity-modulated ...Introduction: In medulloblastoma patients craniospinal irradiation is an important element the treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of absorbed dose to organs at risk using the hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in average risk medulloblastoma patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, thirteen medulloblastoma patients were included. The prescribed total dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 23, 40 Gy in 13 fractions. Two radiotherapy techniques, three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were used to treat these patients. The coverage of the Target was evaluated using the D mean, D95%, D2%, D98% and V95%. Other parameters were also compared such as Integral dose (ID), Homogeneity index (HI) and doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Results: There was no significant difference in the mean dose received by the PTV-Brain or the dose received by 95% and 98% of PTV volume using the two techniques. For PTV-Spine, the percentage volume receiving 95% of the total dose increased significantly in the hybrid IMRT technique compared to the conformal technique. So, hybrid IMRT plan achieved the best coverage for PTV spine. Lower dose for OAR was delivered by 3DCRT, except the heart and thyroid, hybrid IMRT achieved better sparing. All plans resulted in the same dose homogeneity index (DHI) for PTV-Brain. For PTV-Spine, hybrid IMRT technique achieved better dose homogeneity compared to 3DCRT technique (1.09 vs. 1.12;p > 0.05). Conclusions: hybrid IMRT technique can be realized on conformal technique because it achieved better dose coverage for the (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR). 3DCRT reduced mean dose to most OARS, except the heart and thyroid. Therefore, the hybrid IMRT technique may be a CSI treatment alternative to 3DCRT.展开更多
Objective The aim of this study was to study the effect of endocrine therapy combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer.Methods The clinical data of 231 patients with...Objective The aim of this study was to study the effect of endocrine therapy combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer.Methods The clinical data of 231 patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in our hospital from May 2010 to March 2018 were collected.A total of 135 patients were treated with endocrine therapy combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy,and 96 patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy only because of drug allergy,serious adverse reactions,and economic reasons.Two months after the end of the treatment,the short-term curative effect was evaluated using imaging reexamination.The total prostate-specific antigen(TPSA)and free prostate-specific antigen(FPSA)were detected before and 2 months after the end of the treatment.All patients were followed up for at least 3 years,and the metastasis-free survival rate and cumulative survival rate of the two groups were calculated.Results The remission rates(RRs)of the observation and control groups were 64.45%and 46.87%,respectively;the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);however,the efficacy distribution of the endocrine therapy combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy group was significantly better than that of the intensity-modulated radiotherapy group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the two groups in different TNM stages and Gleason grades.After treatment,the levels of TPSA and FPSA were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment;however,the decrease in the endocrine therapy combined with the intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)group was significantly higher than that in the IMRT group(P<0.05).Although there were no significant differences in the 1-year and 3-year cumulative survival rates between the two groups,the 1-year and 3-year metastasis-free survival rates of the endocrine therapy combined with the IMRT group were 60%and 38.17%,respectively,which were significantly higher than those of the IMRT group(37.5%and 20.83%,P<0.05).Conclusion Endocrine therapy combined with IMRT significantly improved the clinical efficacy of advanced prostate cancer,reduced PSA(prostate specific antigen)levels,and improved the metastasis-free survival rates.展开更多
AIM To analyse clinical and dosimetric results of helical tomotherapy(HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT) in complex adjuvant breast and nodes irradiation.METHODS Seventy-three patients were included(31 HT ...AIM To analyse clinical and dosimetric results of helical tomotherapy(HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT) in complex adjuvant breast and nodes irradiation.METHODS Seventy-three patients were included(31 HT and 42 VMAT). Dose were 63.8 Gy(HT) and 63.2 Gy(VMAT) in the tumour bed, 52.2 Gy in the breast, 50.4 Gy in supraclavicular nodes(SCN) and internal mammary chain(IMC) with HT and 52.2 Gy and 49.3 Gy in IMC and SCN with VMAT in 29 fractions. Margins to particle tracking velocimetry were greater in the VMAT cohort(7 mm vs 5 mm).RESULTS For the HT cohort, the coverage of clinical target volumes was as follows: Tumour bed: 99.4% ± 2.4%; breast: 98.4% ± 4.3%; SCN: 99.5% ± 1.2%; IMC:96.5% ± 13.9%. For the VMAT cohort, the coverage was as follows: Tumour bed: 99.7% ± 0.5%, breast: 99.3% ± 0.7%; SCN: 99.6% ± 1.4%; IMC: 99.3% ± 3%. For ipsilateral lung, Dmean and V20 were 13.6 ± 1.2 Gy, 21.1% ± 5%(HT) and 13.6 ± 1.4 Gy, 20.1% ± 3.2%(VMAT). Dmean and V30 of the heart were 7.4 ± 1.4 Gy, 1% ± 1%(HT) and 10.3 ± 4.2 Gy, 2.5% ± 3.9%(VMAT). For controlateral breast Dmean was 3.6 ± 0.2 Gy(HT) and 4.6 ± 0.9 Gy(VMAT). Acute skin toxicity grade 3 was 5% in the two cohorts.CONCLUSION HT and VMAT in complex adjuvant breast irradiation allow a good coverage of target volumes with an acceptable acute tolerance. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of low doses to healthy tissues.展开更多
文摘Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of gemcitabine and concurrent three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) . Methods: From April 2002 to June 2005, 38 pa-tients with inoperable stage III NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine and 3D-CRT simultaneously. Chemotherapy consisted of intravenously gemcitabine 350 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36. 3D-CRT was delivered up to a total dose of 60–64 Gy with a 2.0 Gy dose fraction per day, 5 days per week. Results: The overall response rates of primary tumor and mediastinum metastatic node were 86.8% (33/38) and 90.6% (29/32) respectively, and 91.7% (22/24) and 78.6% (11/14) for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma respectively. The acute side effects of patients were mostly myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, radiation-induced esophagitis and pneumonitis (RTOG I/II), however, all of them were cured. Conclusion: Con-current application of gemcitabine and 3D-CRT can improve the overall response rate for locally advanced NSCLC without aggravating the side effects.
基金supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region,China(No.NZ0680)
文摘OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and toxic effect of the 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3DCRT)for non- small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). METHODS Fifty-two patients with the Stage-I and IV NSCLC were treated with 3DCRT.Cross analysis of the clinical data was conducted in the comparison between the 52 cases with 3DCRT and the other 50 cases with the conventional radiation therapy (CRT).In the 3DCRT group,only the primary tumor and positive lymph-node draining area were included in the clinical target area,setting 4 to 6 coplanar or non-coplanar irradiation fields,with 2 Gy or 3 Gy/fraction,1 fraction a day and 5 fractions per week. The total dose ranged from a test dose(DT)of 66 Gy to 72 Gy.In the CRT group,the field area contained the primary tumor plus the homolateral hilum of the lung,the mediastinum superior or hol-mediastinum,and opposed anteroposterior irradiation.When the dosage reached DT 36~40 Gy,an oblique portal administered radiation was conducted in order to avoid injuring the spinal cord. The DT was 1.8~2.0 Gy/fraction,1 fraction a day,5 fractions per week,with a total dose of 60 Gy to 70 Gy. RESULTS The therapeutic effect(CR+PR)was 90.4% in the 3DCRT group,and was 72% in the CRT group.There was statistically significant difference between the two groups,P<0.01. There was a clinical symptom improvement attained by 96.5% and 86.4% respectively in the two groups,and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups,P<0.01.The 6-month, 1 and 2-year overall survival rates were 92.3%,75.0% and 42.3% in the 3DCRT group,and 76%,60% and 30% in the CRT group, respectively.There was a significant difference in the 6-month overall survival rate between the groups,P<0.05.There was no obvious significant difference in the 1 and 2-year overall survival rates between the two groups,P>0.05.The toxic reaction was 12.5% and 23.7% respectively in the 3DCRT and CRT groups. Acute radioactive esophagitis and leucopenia were markedly lower in the 3DCRT group than in the CRT group.There was a statistically significant difference between the groups,P<0.05.No toxic reaction of Stage-Ⅲand over was found in the 3DCRT group during radiation therapy. CONCLUSION The 3DCRT method has a satisfactory short- term efficacy and improvement of clinical symptoms in treating NSCLC,with a mild toxic reaction and good tolerance in patients. It can be used for enhancing the tumor-control rate and bettering the quality of life.
基金Grant sponsor:Guangzhou Municipal Medicin &Health ProgramGrant number:2006-YB-177
文摘Objective:To investigate the influences of motion artifacts on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction volume and conformal radiotherapy planning. Methods:A phantom which can mimic the clip motion of lung tumor along the cranial-caudal direction is constructed by step motor, small ball of polyethylene and potato. Ten different scan protocols were set and CT data of the phantom were acquired by using a commercial GE LightSpeed16 CT scanner. The 3D reconstruction of the CT data was implemented by adopting volume-rendering technology of GE AdvantageSim 6.0 system. The reconstructed volumes of each target in different scan protocols were measured through 3D measuring tools. Thus, relative deviations of the reconstruction volumes between moving targets and static ones were determined. The three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plans and conformal fields were created and compared for a static/moving target with the WiMRT treatment planning system (TPS). Results:For a static target, there was no obvious difference among the 3D reconstruction volumes when the CT data were acquired with different pitches and slices. The appearance of 3D reconstruction volume and 3D conformal field of a moving target was quite different from that of static one. The maximum relative deviation is nearly 90% for a moving target scanned with different scan protocols. The relative deviations are variable among the different targets, about from -39.8% to 89.5% for a smaller target and from -18.4% to 20.5% for a larger one. Conclusion:The motion artifacts have great effects on 3D-CRT planning and reconstruction volume, which will greatly induce distorted conformal radiation fields and false DVHs for a moving target.
文摘Introduction: Radiation therapy after breast surgery is an integral part of the treatment of early breast cancer. The goal of radiation therapy is to achieve the best possible coverage of the planning target volume (PTV), while reducing the dose to organs at risk (OARs) which are normal tissues whose sensitivity to irradiation could cause damage that can lead to modification of the treatment plan. In the last decade, radiation oncologist started to use the Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for irradiating the breast, in order to achieve better dose distribution and target dose to the PTV and OAR. The aim of this study is to compare 2 external radiotherapy techniques (VMAT vs 3D) for patients with node-positive left breast cancer. Patients and Methods: We randomly selected 10 cases of postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer in our hospital. The patients are all female, the average age was 45.4 years old, and the primary lesions are left breast. The ANOVA test was used to compare the mean difference between subgroups, and the p value Results: Dose volume histogram (DVH) was used to analyze each evaluation dose of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Compared to 3DCRT plans, VMAT provided more uniform coverage to the breast and regional lymph nodes. The max point dose for tVMAT was lower on average (106.4% for VMAT versus 109% for 3DCRT). OAR sparing was improved with tVMAT, with a lower average V17Gy for the left lung (27.91% for VMAT versus 30.04% for 3DCRT, p and lower for V28Gy (13.75% for VMAT versus 22.34% for 3DCRT, p = 0.01). We also found a lower V35Gy for the heart on VMAT plan (p = 0.02). On the contrary, dose of contralateral breast was lower in 3DCRT than VMAT (0.59 Gy vs 3.65 Gy, p = 0.00). Conclusion: The both types of plans can meet the clinical dosimetry demands of postoperative radiotherapy for left breast cancer. The VMAT plan has a better conformity, but 3CDRT can provide a lower dose to the contralateral organs (breast and lung) to avoid the risk of secondary cancers.
基金Supported by Shantou University Medical College Clinical Research Enhancement Initiative,and Research and Travel Grants from the Science and Technology Key Project of Shantou City,China,2012,No.2012-165-131
文摘AIM:To establish the feasibility of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy(SMART) in esophageal cancer(EC).METHODS:Computed tomography(CT)datasets of 10patients with upper or middle thoracic squamous cell EC undergoing chemoradiotherapy were used to generate SMART,conventionally-fractionated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3DCRT)and intensity-modulated radiation therapy(cf-IMRT)plans,respectively.The gross target volume(GTV)of the esophagus,positive regional lymph nodes(LN),and suspected lymph nodes(LN±)were contoured for each patient.The clinical target volume(CTV)was delineated with 2-cm longitudinal and 0.5-to 1.0-cm radial margins with respect to the GTV and with 0.5-cm uniform margins for LN and LN(±).For the SMART plans,there were two planning target volumes(PTVs):PTV66=(GTV+LN)+0.5 cm and PTV54=CTV+0.5 cm.For the 3DCRT and cfIMRT plans,there was only a single PTV:PTV60=CTV+0.5 cm.The prescribed dose for the SMART plans was 66 Gy/30 F to PTV66 and 54 Gy/30 F to PTV54.The dose prescription to the PTV60 for both the 3DCRT and cf-IMRT plans was set to 60 Gy/30 F.All the plans were generated on the Eclipse 10.0 treatment planning system.Fulfillment of the dose criteria for the PTVs received the highest priority,followed by the spinal cord,heart,and lungs.The dose-volume histograms were compared.RESULTS:Clinically acceptable plans were achieved for all the SMART,cf-IMRT,and 3DCRT plans.Compared with the 3DCRT plans,the SMART plans increased the dose delivered to the primary tumor(66Gy vs 60 Gy),with improved sparing of normal tissues in all patients.The Dmax of the spinal cord,V20 of the lungs,and Dmean and V50 of the heart for the SMART and 3DCRT plans were as follows:38.5±2.0 vs 44.7±0.8(P=0.002),17.1±4.0 vs 25.8±5.0(P=0.000),14.4±7.5 vs 21.4±11.1(P=0.000),and 4.9±3.4vs 12.9±7.6(P=0.000),respectively.In contrast to the cf-IMRT plans,the SMART plans permitted a simultaneous dose escalation(6 Gy)to the primary tumor while demonstrating a significant trend of a lower irradiation dose to all organs at risk except the spinal cord,for which no significant difference was found.CONCLUSION:SMART offers the potential for a 6Gy simultaneous escalation in the irradiation dose delivered to the primary tumor of EC and improves the sparing of normal tissues.
文摘Introduction: In medulloblastoma patients craniospinal irradiation is an important element the treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of absorbed dose to organs at risk using the hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in average risk medulloblastoma patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, thirteen medulloblastoma patients were included. The prescribed total dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 23, 40 Gy in 13 fractions. Two radiotherapy techniques, three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were used to treat these patients. The coverage of the Target was evaluated using the D mean, D95%, D2%, D98% and V95%. Other parameters were also compared such as Integral dose (ID), Homogeneity index (HI) and doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Results: There was no significant difference in the mean dose received by the PTV-Brain or the dose received by 95% and 98% of PTV volume using the two techniques. For PTV-Spine, the percentage volume receiving 95% of the total dose increased significantly in the hybrid IMRT technique compared to the conformal technique. So, hybrid IMRT plan achieved the best coverage for PTV spine. Lower dose for OAR was delivered by 3DCRT, except the heart and thyroid, hybrid IMRT achieved better sparing. All plans resulted in the same dose homogeneity index (DHI) for PTV-Brain. For PTV-Spine, hybrid IMRT technique achieved better dose homogeneity compared to 3DCRT technique (1.09 vs. 1.12;p > 0.05). Conclusions: hybrid IMRT technique can be realized on conformal technique because it achieved better dose coverage for the (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR). 3DCRT reduced mean dose to most OARS, except the heart and thyroid. Therefore, the hybrid IMRT technique may be a CSI treatment alternative to 3DCRT.
文摘Objective The aim of this study was to study the effect of endocrine therapy combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer.Methods The clinical data of 231 patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in our hospital from May 2010 to March 2018 were collected.A total of 135 patients were treated with endocrine therapy combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy,and 96 patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy only because of drug allergy,serious adverse reactions,and economic reasons.Two months after the end of the treatment,the short-term curative effect was evaluated using imaging reexamination.The total prostate-specific antigen(TPSA)and free prostate-specific antigen(FPSA)were detected before and 2 months after the end of the treatment.All patients were followed up for at least 3 years,and the metastasis-free survival rate and cumulative survival rate of the two groups were calculated.Results The remission rates(RRs)of the observation and control groups were 64.45%and 46.87%,respectively;the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);however,the efficacy distribution of the endocrine therapy combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy group was significantly better than that of the intensity-modulated radiotherapy group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the two groups in different TNM stages and Gleason grades.After treatment,the levels of TPSA and FPSA were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment;however,the decrease in the endocrine therapy combined with the intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)group was significantly higher than that in the IMRT group(P<0.05).Although there were no significant differences in the 1-year and 3-year cumulative survival rates between the two groups,the 1-year and 3-year metastasis-free survival rates of the endocrine therapy combined with the IMRT group were 60%and 38.17%,respectively,which were significantly higher than those of the IMRT group(37.5%and 20.83%,P<0.05).Conclusion Endocrine therapy combined with IMRT significantly improved the clinical efficacy of advanced prostate cancer,reduced PSA(prostate specific antigen)levels,and improved the metastasis-free survival rates.
文摘AIM To analyse clinical and dosimetric results of helical tomotherapy(HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT) in complex adjuvant breast and nodes irradiation.METHODS Seventy-three patients were included(31 HT and 42 VMAT). Dose were 63.8 Gy(HT) and 63.2 Gy(VMAT) in the tumour bed, 52.2 Gy in the breast, 50.4 Gy in supraclavicular nodes(SCN) and internal mammary chain(IMC) with HT and 52.2 Gy and 49.3 Gy in IMC and SCN with VMAT in 29 fractions. Margins to particle tracking velocimetry were greater in the VMAT cohort(7 mm vs 5 mm).RESULTS For the HT cohort, the coverage of clinical target volumes was as follows: Tumour bed: 99.4% ± 2.4%; breast: 98.4% ± 4.3%; SCN: 99.5% ± 1.2%; IMC:96.5% ± 13.9%. For the VMAT cohort, the coverage was as follows: Tumour bed: 99.7% ± 0.5%, breast: 99.3% ± 0.7%; SCN: 99.6% ± 1.4%; IMC: 99.3% ± 3%. For ipsilateral lung, Dmean and V20 were 13.6 ± 1.2 Gy, 21.1% ± 5%(HT) and 13.6 ± 1.4 Gy, 20.1% ± 3.2%(VMAT). Dmean and V30 of the heart were 7.4 ± 1.4 Gy, 1% ± 1%(HT) and 10.3 ± 4.2 Gy, 2.5% ± 3.9%(VMAT). For controlateral breast Dmean was 3.6 ± 0.2 Gy(HT) and 4.6 ± 0.9 Gy(VMAT). Acute skin toxicity grade 3 was 5% in the two cohorts.CONCLUSION HT and VMAT in complex adjuvant breast irradiation allow a good coverage of target volumes with an acceptable acute tolerance. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of low doses to healthy tissues.