期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Comparison of two hemostasis methods after percutaneous coronary intervention
1
作者 徐延敏 林小静 +5 位作者 李广平 许纲 尹力 袁如玉 郑心田 陈新 《South China Journal of Cardiology》 CAS 2010年第2期96-100,共5页
To assess the safety and efficacy of Boomerang closure wire compared with traditional man-made compression in patients underwent coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .Meth-ods Three h... To assess the safety and efficacy of Boomerang closure wire compared with traditional man-made compression in patients underwent coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .Meth-ods Three hundred and thirty-six cases who underwent transfemoral CAG or PCI were included in this study,221 ca-ses were treated with traditional compression of hemostasis,115 cases treated with Boomerang closure wire.The hemo-stasia time,immobilization time and relative vascular complications of the two groups were compared.Results There were obvious difference in the hemostasia time,immobilization time and the rate of the relative vascular complications (P <0.05) ,no patients experienced major complications in closure wire group,but one case experienced blood trans-fusion to retroperitoneal bleed in traditional man-made compression group.Conclusions closure wire is safe and effec-tive in patients undergoing CAG or PCI using the transfemoral approach,compared with tranditional man-made com-pression,closure wire can extremely decrease hemostasia time and immobilization time,there is a decreased trend in relative vascular complication,especially major complication. 展开更多
关键词 closure wire device vascular complications percutaneous coronary intervention traditional man-made compression
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部