Objective:Validation is an important aspect of an instrument,and it ensures the confidence of researchers to employ the instrument in their studies.This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to ass...Objective:Validation is an important aspect of an instrument,and it ensures the confidence of researchers to employ the instrument in their studies.This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to assess knowledge,attitudes,and practices(KAP) on digital health among nurses since digital health capacity is a major concern in health care that needs to be assessed.Methods:We conducted a methodological study to assess the content validity and reliability of the instrument.First,items were generated through a comprehensive literature review and by obtaining an expert opinion.Second,content and face validity were assessed by a panel of 7 experts.Both the item-level content validity index(I-CVI) and the scale-level content validity index(S-CVI) were established.Moreover,test–retest reliability and internal consistency of the instrument were assessed.Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.Results:The initial pool consisted of 60 items and after obtaining content,face,and construct validity,51 items remained.Items with an I-CVI <0.78 were considered relevant.The S-CVI for relevancy,clarity,ambiguity,and simplicity were 0.93,0.91,0.94,and 0.92,respectively.Five subcomponents were constructed in each knowledge and attitudes domain,and the test–retest reliability test revealed that the instrument has good reliability,showing correlation coefficient values for the KAP domains and the total questionnaire of 0.76,0.98,0.99,and 0.99,respectively.The independent Cronbach's α for all items was 0.76,indicating good internal consistency.Conclusions:The present study established the acceptable validity and ensured the good reliability and internal consistency of the instrument,which can serve as an assessment tool of KAP on digital health among healthcare professionals.展开更多
目的探索遗传因素在双生子儿童心理健康发育中的作用,进行不同版本发育和健康状况评定(develop-ment and well-bing assessment,DAWBA)的效度研究。方法分为同卵双生组(MZ)与异卵双生组(DZ)。利用DAWBA教师版及父母版对双生子儿童所在...目的探索遗传因素在双生子儿童心理健康发育中的作用,进行不同版本发育和健康状况评定(develop-ment and well-bing assessment,DAWBA)的效度研究。方法分为同卵双生组(MZ)与异卵双生组(DZ)。利用DAWBA教师版及父母版对双生子儿童所在班级老师及父母进行双生子心理健康状况的调查。并用Kappa系数分析DAWBA教师版与父母版数据的一致性。结果双生子情绪症状(rMZ=0.549,P=0.000;rDZ=0.263,P=0.146),多动症状(rMZ=0.667,P=0.000;rDZ=0.116,P=0.528),行为症状(rMZ=0.777,P=0.000;rDZ=0.153,P=0.403),抽动症状(rMZ=0.552,P=0.005;rDZ=-0.046,P=0.801),进食症状(rMZ=0.798,P=0.000;rDZ=-0.058P=0.780),其他关注症状(rMZ=0.491,P=0.011;rDZ=0.327,P=0.068);MZ组的相关系数明显大于DZ组。一致性检验显示分离性焦虑症状影响(Kappa=0.004),多动症状(Kappa=0.063),惊恐症状(Kappa=-0.007),其他关注症状(Kappa=0.000),DAWBA教师版与父母版不完全一致。结论遗传在双生子儿童心理健康发育中有一定程度的作用,不同DAWBA版本对研究遗传因素对双生子儿童心理健康发育的影响有较好的效度。展开更多
基金supported by the University of Sri Jayewardenepura(No. ASP/01/RE/AHS/2021/91)。
文摘Objective:Validation is an important aspect of an instrument,and it ensures the confidence of researchers to employ the instrument in their studies.This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to assess knowledge,attitudes,and practices(KAP) on digital health among nurses since digital health capacity is a major concern in health care that needs to be assessed.Methods:We conducted a methodological study to assess the content validity and reliability of the instrument.First,items were generated through a comprehensive literature review and by obtaining an expert opinion.Second,content and face validity were assessed by a panel of 7 experts.Both the item-level content validity index(I-CVI) and the scale-level content validity index(S-CVI) were established.Moreover,test–retest reliability and internal consistency of the instrument were assessed.Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.Results:The initial pool consisted of 60 items and after obtaining content,face,and construct validity,51 items remained.Items with an I-CVI <0.78 were considered relevant.The S-CVI for relevancy,clarity,ambiguity,and simplicity were 0.93,0.91,0.94,and 0.92,respectively.Five subcomponents were constructed in each knowledge and attitudes domain,and the test–retest reliability test revealed that the instrument has good reliability,showing correlation coefficient values for the KAP domains and the total questionnaire of 0.76,0.98,0.99,and 0.99,respectively.The independent Cronbach's α for all items was 0.76,indicating good internal consistency.Conclusions:The present study established the acceptable validity and ensured the good reliability and internal consistency of the instrument,which can serve as an assessment tool of KAP on digital health among healthcare professionals.
文摘目的探索遗传因素在双生子儿童心理健康发育中的作用,进行不同版本发育和健康状况评定(develop-ment and well-bing assessment,DAWBA)的效度研究。方法分为同卵双生组(MZ)与异卵双生组(DZ)。利用DAWBA教师版及父母版对双生子儿童所在班级老师及父母进行双生子心理健康状况的调查。并用Kappa系数分析DAWBA教师版与父母版数据的一致性。结果双生子情绪症状(rMZ=0.549,P=0.000;rDZ=0.263,P=0.146),多动症状(rMZ=0.667,P=0.000;rDZ=0.116,P=0.528),行为症状(rMZ=0.777,P=0.000;rDZ=0.153,P=0.403),抽动症状(rMZ=0.552,P=0.005;rDZ=-0.046,P=0.801),进食症状(rMZ=0.798,P=0.000;rDZ=-0.058P=0.780),其他关注症状(rMZ=0.491,P=0.011;rDZ=0.327,P=0.068);MZ组的相关系数明显大于DZ组。一致性检验显示分离性焦虑症状影响(Kappa=0.004),多动症状(Kappa=0.063),惊恐症状(Kappa=-0.007),其他关注症状(Kappa=0.000),DAWBA教师版与父母版不完全一致。结论遗传在双生子儿童心理健康发育中有一定程度的作用,不同DAWBA版本对研究遗传因素对双生子儿童心理健康发育的影响有较好的效度。
