Obesity is recognized as the second highest risk factor for cancer. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying tobaccorelated cancers are well characterized and efective programs have led to a decline in smoking and related...Obesity is recognized as the second highest risk factor for cancer. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying tobaccorelated cancers are well characterized and efective programs have led to a decline in smoking and related cancers, but there is a global epidemic of obesity without a clear understanding of how obesity causes cancer. Obesity is heterogeneous, and approximately 25% of obese individuals remain healthy(metabolically healthy obese, MHO), so which fat deposition(subcutaneous versus visceral, adipose versus ectopic) is "malignant"? What is the mechanism of carcinogenesis? Is it by metabolic dysregulation or chronic inflammation? Through which chemokines/genes/signaling pathways does adipose tissue influence carcinogenesis? Can selective inhibition of these pathways uncouple obesity from cancers? Do all obesity related cancers(ORCs) share a molecular signature? Are there common(overlapping) genetic loci that make individuals susceptible to obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cancers? Can we identify precursor lesions of ORCs and will early intervention of high risk individuals alter the natural history? It appears unlikely that the obesity epidemic will be controlled anytime soon; answers to these questions will help to reduce the adverse efect of obesity on human condition.展开更多
In order to reasonably explain the phenomenon of cell bioelectricity,we proposed the conservation law of cell membrane area,established the ion inequality equation,and therefore paid attention to the mystery of“θ-τ...In order to reasonably explain the phenomenon of cell bioelectricity,we proposed the conservation law of cell membrane area,established the ion inequality equation,and therefore paid attention to the mystery of“θ-τ”.We researched and analyzed the“θ-τ”mystery,discussed the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,suggested possible experiments to test the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,and gave our research and analysis conclusions:The parity non-conservation in weak interactions,is still a“conjecture”;The experimental scheme suggested in the papers by C.N.Yang et al.cannot determine whether the weak interaction can separate left and right,and it is impossible to directly answer whetherθandτin the“θ-τ”mystery are the same particle;The Co60βdecay experiment such as C.S.Wu is a pseudo-mirror experiment,whether the experimental result violates parity conservation is only based on the assumption of C.N.Yang et al.In fact,experiments such as polarized Co60 did not overturn the so-called“law of parity conservation”.The mirror image principle does not have any physical meaning,does not correspond to any physical conservation quantity,and cannot be destroyed by any physical experiment.In the process of turning“mirror symmetry”and“mirror asymmetry”into so-called physical“common sense”and scientific“facts”respectively,the methods of transformation are“stealing concepts”and“circular argumentation”.The“θ-τ”mystery is a“man-made”mystery.θandτare two different particles,which may be the result of the same precursor particle being divided into two.The work of C.N.Yang,T.D.Lee,C.S.Wu et al.has brought quantum physicists from the“small black room”to the“bigger black room”or“smaller black room”.The right and wise choice is to go back through the door that came in.With the development of science today,it is time for some contents to reform from the bottom.展开更多
文摘Obesity is recognized as the second highest risk factor for cancer. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying tobaccorelated cancers are well characterized and efective programs have led to a decline in smoking and related cancers, but there is a global epidemic of obesity without a clear understanding of how obesity causes cancer. Obesity is heterogeneous, and approximately 25% of obese individuals remain healthy(metabolically healthy obese, MHO), so which fat deposition(subcutaneous versus visceral, adipose versus ectopic) is "malignant"? What is the mechanism of carcinogenesis? Is it by metabolic dysregulation or chronic inflammation? Through which chemokines/genes/signaling pathways does adipose tissue influence carcinogenesis? Can selective inhibition of these pathways uncouple obesity from cancers? Do all obesity related cancers(ORCs) share a molecular signature? Are there common(overlapping) genetic loci that make individuals susceptible to obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cancers? Can we identify precursor lesions of ORCs and will early intervention of high risk individuals alter the natural history? It appears unlikely that the obesity epidemic will be controlled anytime soon; answers to these questions will help to reduce the adverse efect of obesity on human condition.
文摘In order to reasonably explain the phenomenon of cell bioelectricity,we proposed the conservation law of cell membrane area,established the ion inequality equation,and therefore paid attention to the mystery of“θ-τ”.We researched and analyzed the“θ-τ”mystery,discussed the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,suggested possible experiments to test the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,and gave our research and analysis conclusions:The parity non-conservation in weak interactions,is still a“conjecture”;The experimental scheme suggested in the papers by C.N.Yang et al.cannot determine whether the weak interaction can separate left and right,and it is impossible to directly answer whetherθandτin the“θ-τ”mystery are the same particle;The Co60βdecay experiment such as C.S.Wu is a pseudo-mirror experiment,whether the experimental result violates parity conservation is only based on the assumption of C.N.Yang et al.In fact,experiments such as polarized Co60 did not overturn the so-called“law of parity conservation”.The mirror image principle does not have any physical meaning,does not correspond to any physical conservation quantity,and cannot be destroyed by any physical experiment.In the process of turning“mirror symmetry”and“mirror asymmetry”into so-called physical“common sense”and scientific“facts”respectively,the methods of transformation are“stealing concepts”and“circular argumentation”.The“θ-τ”mystery is a“man-made”mystery.θandτare two different particles,which may be the result of the same precursor particle being divided into two.The work of C.N.Yang,T.D.Lee,C.S.Wu et al.has brought quantum physicists from the“small black room”to the“bigger black room”or“smaller black room”.The right and wise choice is to go back through the door that came in.With the development of science today,it is time for some contents to reform from the bottom.
