期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
大脑中动脉重度狭窄侧枝循环对脑梗死发病机制及NIHSS评分的影响 被引量:27
1
作者 闫俊 常嵘 +2 位作者 李伟旺 辛伽伦 刘之荣 《陕西医学杂志》 CAS 2017年第12期1636-1637,共2页
目的:研究大脑中动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(狭窄率≥70%或闭塞)导致的急性脑梗死患者,责任血管范围内侧枝循环与脑梗死发病机制及NIHSS评分的关系。方法:连续性收集经脑血管数字减影血管造影(DSA)证实单侧大脑中动脉重度狭窄(或闭塞)患者123例... 目的:研究大脑中动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(狭窄率≥70%或闭塞)导致的急性脑梗死患者,责任血管范围内侧枝循环与脑梗死发病机制及NIHSS评分的关系。方法:连续性收集经脑血管数字减影血管造影(DSA)证实单侧大脑中动脉重度狭窄(或闭塞)患者123例,分为侧枝循环开放组与未开放组,头颅磁共振+弥散(MRI+DWI)分析梗死灶特点,记录入院NHISS评分与治疗7d后NIHSS评分,分析侧枝循环对脑梗发病机制分型及NIHSS评分的影响。结果:(1)大脑中动脉重度狭窄(或闭塞)导致的急性缺血性卒中的病理机制分型中,侧枝循环开放组病理机制中动脉-动脉栓塞机制最常见(17例,40.5%),其次为载体动脉阻塞穿支动脉(13例,31.0%),低灌注/栓子清除下降(7例,16.7%)及混合机制(5例,11.9%)所占比例较少;侧枝循环未开放组低灌注/栓子清除下降所占比例最大(32例,39.5%),其次为载体动脉阻塞穿支动脉(20例,24.7%),动脉-动脉栓塞(17例,21.0%)及混合机制(12例,14.8%)。(2)侧枝循环开放组经药物治疗前后NIHSS评分均较无侧枝代偿组分值低,神经功能好转率高。结论:大脑中动脉粥样硬化重度狭窄(或闭塞)导致的急性脑梗死,侧枝循环可影响急性缺血性卒中病理机制分型及NIHSS评分。 展开更多
关键词 脑梗塞 颅内动脉硬化 大脑中动脉 @卒中量表
下载PDF
Introduction to cognitive assessment scales in screening for mild cognitive impairment after stroke: A review
2
作者 Luo Yang Hong Guo +7 位作者 Yan-Ling Shen Li Li Hai-Yan Wang Shao-Hua Gong You-Hua Liu Xiao-Ping Yi Dan Zhao Hui Ju 《TMR Integrative Nursing》 2019年第5期166-172,共7页
Objective:In order to improve the quality of life of patients more effectively,this paper introduces the types and usages of scales for screening mild cognitive dysfunction after stroke and provides a basis for early ... Objective:In order to improve the quality of life of patients more effectively,this paper introduces the types and usages of scales for screening mild cognitive dysfunction after stroke and provides a basis for early identification of mild cognitive impairment.Methods:Read,analyze,summarize,and sort out relevant literature.Results:The mild cognitive impairment assessment scales are broadly divided into two categories:the comprehensive rating scales and the special assessment scales.There are 7 comprehensive assessment scales for the comprehensive rating scales,among which the Mini-mental State of Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale are the most widely used.The special assessment scales are mainly evaluated by the symptoms of cognitive dysfunction and can be divided into five types.Conclusion:Early diagnosis and intervention in patients with cognitive dysfunction will help improve the prognosis of patients.Each assessment scale has its advantages and limitations in both sensitivity and discrimination.Effective use of appropriate scales to diagnose cognitive dysfunction and to screen early,to prevent early,to treat early can effectively improve the quality of life of elderly patients. 展开更多
关键词 STROKE Mild cognitive dysfunction Rating scale
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部