Objective： To evaluate the effects of core stability exercise （CST） on rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods： Randomly controlled trials about the effects of CST on rehabilitation in stroke pa...Objective： To evaluate the effects of core stability exercise （CST） on rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods： Randomly controlled trials about the effects of CST on rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia were searched in the database, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM and VIP. Search terms include “core stability training / core stability exercise / core stabilization training / core stabilization exercise/ core strength training / core strength exercise” and “stroke / brain ischemia / cerebral infarction / cerebral hemorrhage / intracranial thrombosis / brain hemorrhage / cerebrovascular disorder /cerebrovascular accident, cerebrovascular disease / hemiplegia / hemiparesis/ stroke rehabilitation”. Study screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two researchers independently. Data was analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results： Totally 11 studies and 704 patients were included with 352 patients in experiment group and 352 in control group. Results of meta-analysis showed that combination of CST and conventional rehabilitation had better effects on trunk control [MD = 10.44, 95% CI （8.83-12.04）, P 〈 0.001], banlace [MD = 5.6, 95% CI （4.81-6.39）, P 〈 0.001], activities of daily living [MD = 12.06, 95% CI （7.65-16.46）, P 〈 0.001], ambulation functional [MD = 0.72, 95% CI （0.32-1.12）, P 〈 0.001] and walking speed [MD = 3.39, 95% CI （2.03-4.76）, P 〈 0.001] than conventional rehabilitation, but there is no clear difference on walking stride [MD = 2.52, 95% CI （-0.25-5.29）, P = 0.07] between two groups. Conclusion： CST together with conventional rehabilitation can better improve trunk control, banlace, activities of daily living, ambulation functional and walking speed in stroke patients compared with conventional rehabilitation, but can not make the walking stride better significantly. However, since the conclusion of this meta-analysis was drawn based on middle quality RCTs, future high quality researchs should be conducted to confirm its positive intervention effects.展开更多
文摘Objective： To evaluate the effects of core stability exercise （CST） on rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods： Randomly controlled trials about the effects of CST on rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia were searched in the database, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM and VIP. Search terms include “core stability training / core stability exercise / core stabilization training / core stabilization exercise/ core strength training / core strength exercise” and “stroke / brain ischemia / cerebral infarction / cerebral hemorrhage / intracranial thrombosis / brain hemorrhage / cerebrovascular disorder /cerebrovascular accident, cerebrovascular disease / hemiplegia / hemiparesis/ stroke rehabilitation”. Study screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two researchers independently. Data was analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results： Totally 11 studies and 704 patients were included with 352 patients in experiment group and 352 in control group. Results of meta-analysis showed that combination of CST and conventional rehabilitation had better effects on trunk control [MD = 10.44, 95% CI （8.83-12.04）, P 〈 0.001], banlace [MD = 5.6, 95% CI （4.81-6.39）, P 〈 0.001], activities of daily living [MD = 12.06, 95% CI （7.65-16.46）, P 〈 0.001], ambulation functional [MD = 0.72, 95% CI （0.32-1.12）, P 〈 0.001] and walking speed [MD = 3.39, 95% CI （2.03-4.76）, P 〈 0.001] than conventional rehabilitation, but there is no clear difference on walking stride [MD = 2.52, 95% CI （-0.25-5.29）, P = 0.07] between two groups. Conclusion： CST together with conventional rehabilitation can better improve trunk control, banlace, activities of daily living, ambulation functional and walking speed in stroke patients compared with conventional rehabilitation, but can not make the walking stride better significantly. However, since the conclusion of this meta-analysis was drawn based on middle quality RCTs, future high quality researchs should be conducted to confirm its positive intervention effects.
