期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
比较分析α-糜蛋白与尿激酶雾化吸入在支气管扩张治疗中的应用效果 被引量:4
1
作者 朱勇 陈华良 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2014年第12期28-31,35,共5页
目的比较分析α-糜蛋白与尿激酶雾化吸人在支气管扩张治疗中的应用效果。方法选择2011年5月-2013年1月葛洲坝中心医院治疗的支气管扩张患者50例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各25例。对照组患者给予仪一糜蛋白雾化吸入治疗。观察组患... 目的比较分析α-糜蛋白与尿激酶雾化吸人在支气管扩张治疗中的应用效果。方法选择2011年5月-2013年1月葛洲坝中心医院治疗的支气管扩张患者50例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各25例。对照组患者给予仪一糜蛋白雾化吸入治疗。观察组患者给予尿激酶雾化吸人治疗,对两组患者临床疗效及治疗前后动脉血气指标进行分析比较。结果①观察组患者治愈率为32.0%,总有效率为96.0%;对照组患者治愈率为24.0%,总有效率为80.0%;观察组患者的治愈率和总有效率均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。②治疗后观察组PaCO2水平[(40.4±8.4)mmHg]明显低于对照组[(48.2±9.0)mmHg],PaO2水平[(86.6±11.2)mmHg]明显高与对照组[(72.4±10.5)mmHg],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论尿激酶较仅一糜蛋白雾化吸入在支气管扩张治疗中具有较好的应用效果,值得推广。 展开更多
关键词 ±糜蛋白 尿激酶 雾化吸入 支气管扩张
下载PDF
Cell proliferation of esophageal squamous epithelium in erosive and non-erosive reflux disease 被引量:1
2
作者 Carlo Calabrese Lorenzo Montanaro +7 位作者 Giuseppina Liguori Elisa Brighenti Mauela Vici Paolo Gionchetti Fernando Rizzello Massimo Campieri Massimo Derenzini Davide Trerè 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第40期4496-4502,共7页
AIM: To elucidate cell proliferation in erosive reflux disease (ERD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), we evaluated markers in squamous epithelial cells.METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with gas- t... AIM: To elucidate cell proliferation in erosive reflux disease (ERD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), we evaluated markers in squamous epithelial cells.METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with gas- troesophageal-reflux-disease-related symptoms (21 NERD and 13 ERD) were evaluated for the enrolment into the study. All patients underwent 24-h pH moni- toring, standard endoscopy, and biopsy for histological evaluation. The expression of cyclins D and A was eval- uated by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from isolated epithelial cells. In all samples, analysis of the isolated cell population revealed the presence of epithelial cells only.RESULTS: Real-time RT-PCR showed that, in patientswith ERD, the relative expression of cyclin D1 mRNA in esophageal epithelium was strongly decreased in comparison with NERD patients. The mean value of relative expression of cyclin D1 mRNA in NERD patients was 3.44 ± 1.9, whereas in ERD patients, it was 1.32 ± 0.87 (P = 0.011). Real-time RT-PCR showed that, in patients with ERD, relative expression of cyclin A mRNA in esophageal epithelium was decreased in comparison with that in NERD patients (2.31 ± 2.87 vs 0.66 ± 1.11). The mean bromodeoxyuridine labeling index in the NERD patients was 5.42% ± 1.68%, whereas in ERD patients, it was 4.3% ± 1.59%. 展开更多
关键词 Esophageal cell proliferation Erosive refluxdisease Non-erosive reflux disease Gastroesophagealreflux disease Cyclin A Cyclin D BROMODEOXYURIDINE
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部