Let X be the limit of an inverse system {Xα, παβ, ∧} and and let λ be the cardinal number of A. Assume that each projection πα ： X → Xα is an open and onto map and X is A-paracompact. We prove that if each ...Let X be the limit of an inverse system {Xα, παβ, ∧} and and let λ be the cardinal number of A. Assume that each projection πα ： X → Xα is an open and onto map and X is A-paracompact. We prove that if each Xα is B（LF, ω^2）-refinable （hereditarily B（LF, ω^2）- refinable）, then X is B（LF, ω^2）-refinable （hereditarily B（LF,ω ^2）-refinable）. Furthermore, we show that B（LF, ω^2）-refinable spaces can be preserved inversely undcr closed maps.展开更多
In this paper, some equivalent versions of B(D,λ)-refinability are given. One of these equivalent versions, is that a space X is B(D, ωo)-refinable if and only if X is strongly quasi-paracompact. As an application o...In this paper, some equivalent versions of B(D,λ)-refinability are given. One of these equivalent versions, is that a space X is B(D, ωo)-refinable if and only if X is strongly quasi-paracompact. As an application of the above result, the author shows that weak θ-refinability is strictly weaker than strong quasi-paracompactness in T4-spaces, which answers a question posed by Jiang. In addition, the author proves that a weak version of B(D,λ) always implies weak θ-refinability for any λ<ω1, and also give a T4, B(D,ωo)-refinable (=strongly quasi-paracompact) space which is not θ-refinable.展开更多
Let {Xi,πki,ω} be an inverse sequence and X -- lim{Xi,πki,ω）. If each Xi is hereditarily （resp. metaLindelSf, σ-metaLindelSf, σ-orthocompact, weakly suborthocompact, δθ-refinable, weakly θ-refinable, weakly...Let {Xi,πki,ω} be an inverse sequence and X -- lim{Xi,πki,ω）. If each Xi is hereditarily （resp. metaLindelSf, σ-metaLindelSf, σ-orthocompact, weakly suborthocompact, δθ-refinable, weakly θ-refinable, weakly δθ-refinable）, then so is X.展开更多
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10671173)
文摘Let X be the limit of an inverse system {Xα, παβ, ∧} and and let λ be the cardinal number of A. Assume that each projection πα ： X → Xα is an open and onto map and X is A-paracompact. We prove that if each Xα is B（LF, ω^2）-refinable （hereditarily B（LF, ω^2）- refinable）, then X is B（LF, ω^2）-refinable （hereditarily B（LF,ω ^2）-refinable）. Furthermore, we show that B（LF, ω^2）-refinable spaces can be preserved inversely undcr closed maps.
基金The NNSF (02KJB110001) of the Education Committee of Jiangsu Province.
文摘In this paper, some equivalent versions of B(D,λ)-refinability are given. One of these equivalent versions, is that a space X is B(D, ωo)-refinable if and only if X is strongly quasi-paracompact. As an application of the above result, the author shows that weak θ-refinability is strictly weaker than strong quasi-paracompactness in T4-spaces, which answers a question posed by Jiang. In addition, the author proves that a weak version of B(D,λ) always implies weak θ-refinability for any λ<ω1, and also give a T4, B(D,ωo)-refinable (=strongly quasi-paracompact) space which is not θ-refinable.
文摘Let {Xi,πki,ω} be an inverse sequence and X -- lim{Xi,πki,ω）. If each Xi is hereditarily （resp. metaLindelSf, σ-metaLindelSf, σ-orthocompact, weakly suborthocompact, δθ-refinable, weakly θ-refinable, weakly δθ-refinable）, then so is X.
