期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
瓦解“经济主义的政治模式”与“偶然性逻辑”的确立——评拉克劳、墨菲对历史唯物主义方法论的“批判” 被引量:1
1
作者 孙亮 《学习与探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期40-43,共4页
以人类解放为主旨的历史唯物主义,其基本的理论框架是一种"经济主义的政治模式",即高度关注经济领域对抗性的政治性问题,这是从经济和财产权的视角切入人类解放这一政治性问题的唯一路径。正是立足于这种历史唯物主义的基本... 以人类解放为主旨的历史唯物主义,其基本的理论框架是一种"经济主义的政治模式",即高度关注经济领域对抗性的政治性问题,这是从经济和财产权的视角切入人类解放这一政治性问题的唯一路径。正是立足于这种历史唯物主义的基本理论框架,形成了马克思自身对于革命主体——"阶级"的建构。在"后马克思主义"理论中,在思考这一历史唯物主义的核心术语时,拉克劳、墨菲在通向列宁、葛兰西的"思想墓碑"上错误地镌刻了瓦解"经济主义的政治模式"的碑文,从而将"阶级"的思考从经济基础这一分析框架上抽离出来并使其碎片化,以达到其在"资本主义民主"这一既定的前提下实现激进多元民主政治的构想。 展开更多
关键词 “后马克思主义” “偶然性逻辑” 拉克劳 墨菲
下载PDF
Recent Political Developments in India and Their Effects
2
作者 Wang Shida Yang Rui 《Contemporary International Relations》 2017年第4期72-88,共17页
In March 2017, Narendra Modi led his Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP) to victory in state elections, among which he gained parliamentary election of Uttar Pradesh(state in northern India), known as the weather vane of Indi... In March 2017, Narendra Modi led his Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP) to victory in state elections, among which he gained parliamentary election of Uttar Pradesh(state in northern India), known as the weather vane of Indian elections. Back in 2014, the BJP had already won a simple majority in Lok Sabha(the lower house of parliament), bringing an end to more than 30 years of coalition government. Now, the BJP is exhibiting stronger presence as a one-party-rule at both federal and local levels, with no counter-balance from the Indian National Congress, local parties, or left wing parties now or in the foreseeable future. This increases the likelihood of Modi's re-election as prime minister in 2019. Obviously,Indian political development is characterized by complexity, accidental factors and intrinsic logic, which will definitely exert great influence on the future of India. 展开更多
关键词 INDIA Narendra Modi Bharatiya Janata Party Hindu nationalism (Hindutva)
下载PDF
The Logic of Contingency in China's Insistence on the Non-interference Principle 被引量:1
3
作者 Zhongqi Pan Ping Du 《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》 2015年第4期597-615,共19页
China's insistence on the non-interference principle has been increasingly inconsistent. While China's concern with sovereignty, regime security, and legitimacy, as well as its developing country identity, have push... China's insistence on the non-interference principle has been increasingly inconsistent. While China's concern with sovereignty, regime security, and legitimacy, as well as its developing country identity, have pushed it to continue its insistence on the principle of non-interference, China's further adaptation to the international system, increasing engagement in intemational institutions, and new identity as a responsible power have led China to drag its feet on the same principle. To reconcile these competing forces, China has to make concessions, namely, setting preconditions to legitimize intervention, designing a sovereignty-first solution, and/or complementing the non-interference principle with alternative principles. China's application of the non-interference principle has thus been made contingent. It is more inflexible at one end of a spectrum and more flexible at the other end, with China's foreign policies shifting back and forth between them. 展开更多
关键词 China · Non-interference · Principle · Intervention · Sovereignty · Insistence
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部