论“性骚扰”侵权行为的认定及责任承担

"性骚扰"是一种不受他人欢迎和公众支持的行为,是对他人人格尊严的侵犯。在我国法治完善与进步的过程中,对该行为在立法上应予以规制,使行为人有效约束自己的行为,使受害人能够获得法律的救济,最终遏制该行为。该文从"性骚扰"的概念界定、特性分析入手,指出其承担民事责任的理论依据,"性骚扰"是侵害一般人格权的行为,可以适用侵权损害赔偿的法律制度来确定承担民事责任的方式。

话说美国的“性骚扰”

报载有关中国留学生曹显志在美国因被控对继女“性侵犯”而遭杀身之祸一案引起了读者的极大反响。笔者曾就“虐待儿童”问题根据亲身经历撰文作了评述。本文将与读者讨论该案所涉及的另一内容——“性骚扰”。

“性骚扰”的法律界定和防范机制研究

性骚扰的存在是一个不争的事实。然而什么叫“性骚扰” ,怎样从法律技术上对之予以确认 ,并有效地予以制裁与惩罚 ,无论理论上还是实践中都是一个正在困扰着司法工作者、亟待解决的问题。

办公室的“性骚扰”

几年前，“性骚扰”对我们来说还是个新词，实际上在一些发达国家，从20多年前就开始把性骚扰当成一个重要的社会问题，有各种各样的法规禁止性骚扰。在我国，这几年也陆续出现了一些性骚扰官司，特别是2005年12月，“禁止对妇女实施性骚扰”写进了修改后的《妇女权益保障法》，人们对这个问题的关注多了起来。国内某网站3月做的一次调查结果显示：近三分之一的人遭遇或看到过发生在身边的职场性骚扰。

要“性骚扰立法”热,抑或要“立法效益”

对于“性骚扰立法”热,作者从法律资源的运用理性、立法的可行性、紧迫性、立法的公意基础四个角度作了分析,认为性骚扰立法应该缓行,而且还就立法要避免的五个误区作了论述。

Analysis on the Ways to Prevention and Cure of Sexual Harassment On the Campus under the Perspective of Gender Equal Education

Sexual harassment on campus has increasingly become the focus of widespread attention from all walks of life. The special identity of subject and object of sexual harassment on campus, concealed action, long cycle, mainly come from the idea of a deep dilemma, namely the lack of social gender equity. And the first premise to realize social gender equality is to ensure the education gender justice. Therefore, we need to draw lessons from the experience of the gender equality education in Taiwan, clear the social differences in the mind, respect for diverse gender culture; At the legislative level, improve laws and regulations, safeguard formal sources of law; At the system level, set up specialized agencies, through the permeability of course teaching, the strengthening of construction of teaching staff and the academic research, systematically discuss the effective path to construct mechanism of campus sexual harassment prevention.