期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
“去年”与“旧年”的同源关系
1
作者 刘铭 《今古文创》 2024年第38期113-116,共4页
“去年”或者“旧年”这两个词语均有“过去的一年”这个含义。本文对这两个词语的语音、语义、语源等方面做了初步的探究,以证明它们之间的同源关系。
关键词 “去年” “旧年” 同源
下载PDF
时间词“昨年”、“旧年”的共时分布及其历时发展 被引量:2
2
作者 张言军 《海南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第3期139-144,共6页
现代汉语中表示"今年的上一年"这一概念的常用词是"去年"。而从历时的角度看,"昨年"在元明清时期,"旧年"在唐宋元明清时期也都曾一度用来表示这一概念。在历时的竞争中,两词逐渐衰落,并最终被... 现代汉语中表示"今年的上一年"这一概念的常用词是"去年"。而从历时的角度看,"昨年"在元明清时期,"旧年"在唐宋元明清时期也都曾一度用来表示这一概念。在历时的竞争中,两词逐渐衰落,并最终被淘汰,现代汉语中两词仅在个别方言点中有所保留。 展开更多
关键词 “昨年” “旧年” 共时分布 历时发展
下载PDF
Octogenarian liver grafts:Is their use for transplant currently justified? 被引量:1
3
作者 Carlos Jiménez-Romero Felix Cambra +6 位作者 Oscar Caso Alejandro Manrique Jorge Calvo Alejandro Marcacuzco Paula Rioja David Lora Iago Justo 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2017年第17期3099-3110,共12页
AIMTo analyse the impact of octogenarian donors in liver transplantation.METHODSWe present a retrospective single-center study, performed between November 1996 and March 2015, that comprises a sample of 153 liver tran... AIMTo analyse the impact of octogenarian donors in liver transplantation.METHODSWe present a retrospective single-center study, performed between November 1996 and March 2015, that comprises a sample of 153 liver transplants. Recipients were divided into two groups according to liver donor age: recipients of donors ≤ 65 years (group A; n = 102), and recipients of donors ≥ 80 years (group B; n = 51). A comparative analysis between the groups was performed. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD, and qualitative variables as percentages. Differences in properties between qualitative variables were assessed by χ<sup>2</sup> test. Comparison of quantitative variables was made by t-test. Graft and patient survivals were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTSOne, 3 and 5-year overall patient survival was 87.3%, 84% and 75.2%, respectively, in recipients of younger grafts vs 88.2%, 84.1% and 66.4%, respectively, in recipients of octogenarian grafts (P = 0.748). One, 3 and 5-year overall graft survival was 84.3%, 83.1% and 74.2%, respectively, in recipients of younger grafts vs 84.3%, 79.4% and 64.2%, respectively, in recipients of octogenarian grafts (P = 0.524). After excluding the patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (16 in group A and 10 in group B), the 1, 3 and 5-year patient (P = 0.657) and graft (P = 0.419) survivals were practically the same in both groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that overall patient survival was adversely affected by cerebrovascular donor death, hepatocarcinoma, and recipient preoperative bilirubin, and overall graft survival was adversely influenced by cerebrovascular donor death, and recipient preoperative bilirubin.CONCLUSIONThe standard criteria for utilization of octogenarian liver grafts are: normal gross appearance and consistency, normal or almost normal liver tests, hemodynamic stability with use of < 10 μg/kg per minute of vasopressors before procurement, intensive care unit stay < 3 d, CIT < 9 h, absence of atherosclerosis in the hepatic and gastroduodenal arteries, and no relevant histological alterations in the pre-transplant biopsy, such as fibrosis, hepatitis, cholestasis or macrosteatosis > 30%. 展开更多
关键词 Older liver Donor age Marginal liver Liver transplant Aging liver
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部