[Objective] This study was conducted to determine the safe dose of Tongmai Tangyanming capsule in clinic by evaluating its acute toxicity, so as to ensure clinical medication safety. [Method] The test was designed acc...[Objective] This study was conducted to determine the safe dose of Tongmai Tangyanming capsule in clinic by evaluating its acute toxicity, so as to ensure clinical medication safety. [Method] The test was designed according to ＂Technique Requirements of Research of New Chinese Medicine＂ and ＂Guide for Research of New Chinese Medicine＂, mice were intragastrically administrated with Tongmai Tangyanming capsule at a maximum concentration and a maximum volume, and the acute toxic response of mice was observed, so as to determine medi- na lethal dose （LDso） and maximum administration dosage of Tongmai Tangyanming capsule. [Result] The LD^o could not be detected in the test, and the maximum administration dosage of mouse was calculated to be 112.104 g of dried herbs/（kg.d）, equivalent to 260 times of clinical dose of adult. [Conclusion] Chinese herbal compound Tongmai Tangyanming capsule has low acute toxicity, and its clinical dose is safe and reliable.展开更多
AIM: To study the anti-HBV effect of liposome-encapsulated matrine (Lip-M) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: 2.2.15 cell line was cultured in vitro observe the effect of Lip-M and matrine on the secretion of HBsAg and HB...AIM: To study the anti-HBV effect of liposome-encapsulated matrine (Lip-M) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: 2.2.15 cell line was cultured in vitro observe the effect of Lip-M and matrine on the secretion of HBsAg and HBeAg. The toxicity of Lip-M and matrine to 2.2.15 cell line was also studied by MTT method. In in vivo study, drug treatment experiment was carried out on the 13th day after ducks were infected with duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV). The ducks were randomly divided into 4 groups with 5-6 ducks in each group. Lip-M and matrine were given to DHBV-infected ducks respectively by gastric perfusion. Four groups were observed: group of Lip-M (20 mg/kg), group of Lip-M (10 mg/kg), group of matrine (20 mg/kg) and group of blank model. The drug was given once daily for 20 d continuously, and normal saline was used as control. The blood was drawn from the posterior tibial vein of all ducks before treatment (T0), after the medication for 5 (T5), 10 (T10), 15 (T15), 20 (T20) d and withdrawl of the drug for 3 d (P3). The serum samples were separated and stored at -70 ℃, DHBV-DNA was detected by the dot-blot hybridization. RESULTS: After addition of Lip-M and matrine to 2.2.15 cell line for eleven d, the median toxic concentration (TC50) of Lip-M and matrine was 7.29 mg/mL and 1.33 mg/mL respectively. The median concentration (IC50) of Lip-M to inhibit HBsAg and HBeAg expression was 0.078 mg/mL and 3.35 mg/mL respectively. The treatment index (TI) value of Lip-M for HBsAg and HBeAg was 93.46 and 2.17 respectively, better than that of matrine. The DHBV-infected duck model treatment test showed that the duck serum DHBV-DNA levels were markedly reduced in the group of Lip-M (20 mg/kg) after treated by gastric perfusion for 10, 15 and 20 d (0.43±0.22 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 4.70, P= 0.001<0.01.0.40±0.12 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 6.34, P= 0.000<0.01. 0.22±0.10 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 8.30, P= 0.000<0.01), compared to the group of matrine (20 mg/kg) (0.43±0.22 vs 0.79±0.19, t = 3.17, P= 0.01<0.05. 0.40±0.12 vs 0.73±0.24, t = 3.21, P= 0.009<0.05. 0.22±0.10 vs0.55±0.32, t = 2.27, P= 0.046<0.05.), and the control (0.43±0.22 vs50.98±0.29, t = 3.68, P = 0.005<0.01. 0.40±0.12 vs 0.97±0.30, t = 4.26, P= 0.002<0.01. 0.22±0.10 vs 0.95±0.27, t = 5.76, P= 0.000<0.01). After the treatment for 20 d and withdrawl of the drug for 3 d, duck serum DHBV-DNA level in the group of Lip-M (10 mg/kg) markedly reduced (0.56±0.26 vs0.95±0.38, t = 5.26, P= 0.003<0.05. 0.55±0.25 vs 0.95±0.38, t = 5.52, P= 0.003<0.05), and the difference was significant as compared with the control (0.56±0.26 vs 0.95±0.27, t = 2.37, P = 0.042<0.05. 0.55±0.25 vs 0.89±0.18, t = 2.55, P= 0.031<0.05), but not significant as compared with the group of matrine (20 mg/kg). After withdrawl of the drug for 3 d, the levels of DHBV-DNA did not relapse in both groups of Lip-M. CONCLUSION: Lip-M can evidently inhibit the replication of hepatitis B virus In vitro and in viva, its anti-HBV effect is better than that of matrine.展开更多
基金Supported by Modern Pharmaceutical Program of Guiyang Scientific and Technological Planning Project in 2013(ZKHT[2013204]4-6)Special Fund for Research and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)Modernization Technology Industry(QKHZYZ[2011]5012)~~
文摘[Objective] This study was conducted to determine the safe dose of Tongmai Tangyanming capsule in clinic by evaluating its acute toxicity, so as to ensure clinical medication safety. [Method] The test was designed according to ＂Technique Requirements of Research of New Chinese Medicine＂ and ＂Guide for Research of New Chinese Medicine＂, mice were intragastrically administrated with Tongmai Tangyanming capsule at a maximum concentration and a maximum volume, and the acute toxic response of mice was observed, so as to determine medi- na lethal dose （LDso） and maximum administration dosage of Tongmai Tangyanming capsule. [Result] The LD^o could not be detected in the test, and the maximum administration dosage of mouse was calculated to be 112.104 g of dried herbs/（kg.d）, equivalent to 260 times of clinical dose of adult. [Conclusion] Chinese herbal compound Tongmai Tangyanming capsule has low acute toxicity, and its clinical dose is safe and reliable.
基金Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, No.B990353
文摘AIM: To study the anti-HBV effect of liposome-encapsulated matrine (Lip-M) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: 2.2.15 cell line was cultured in vitro observe the effect of Lip-M and matrine on the secretion of HBsAg and HBeAg. The toxicity of Lip-M and matrine to 2.2.15 cell line was also studied by MTT method. In in vivo study, drug treatment experiment was carried out on the 13th day after ducks were infected with duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV). The ducks were randomly divided into 4 groups with 5-6 ducks in each group. Lip-M and matrine were given to DHBV-infected ducks respectively by gastric perfusion. Four groups were observed: group of Lip-M (20 mg/kg), group of Lip-M (10 mg/kg), group of matrine (20 mg/kg) and group of blank model. The drug was given once daily for 20 d continuously, and normal saline was used as control. The blood was drawn from the posterior tibial vein of all ducks before treatment (T0), after the medication for 5 (T5), 10 (T10), 15 (T15), 20 (T20) d and withdrawl of the drug for 3 d (P3). The serum samples were separated and stored at -70 ℃, DHBV-DNA was detected by the dot-blot hybridization. RESULTS: After addition of Lip-M and matrine to 2.2.15 cell line for eleven d, the median toxic concentration (TC50) of Lip-M and matrine was 7.29 mg/mL and 1.33 mg/mL respectively. The median concentration (IC50) of Lip-M to inhibit HBsAg and HBeAg expression was 0.078 mg/mL and 3.35 mg/mL respectively. The treatment index (TI) value of Lip-M for HBsAg and HBeAg was 93.46 and 2.17 respectively, better than that of matrine. The DHBV-infected duck model treatment test showed that the duck serum DHBV-DNA levels were markedly reduced in the group of Lip-M (20 mg/kg) after treated by gastric perfusion for 10, 15 and 20 d (0.43±0.22 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 4.70, P= 0.001<0.01.0.40±0.12 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 6.34, P= 0.000<0.01. 0.22±0.10 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 8.30, P= 0.000<0.01), compared to the group of matrine (20 mg/kg) (0.43±0.22 vs 0.79±0.19, t = 3.17, P= 0.01<0.05. 0.40±0.12 vs 0.73±0.24, t = 3.21, P= 0.009<0.05. 0.22±0.10 vs0.55±0.32, t = 2.27, P= 0.046<0.05.), and the control (0.43±0.22 vs50.98±0.29, t = 3.68, P = 0.005<0.01. 0.40±0.12 vs 0.97±0.30, t = 4.26, P= 0.002<0.01. 0.22±0.10 vs 0.95±0.27, t = 5.76, P= 0.000<0.01). After the treatment for 20 d and withdrawl of the drug for 3 d, duck serum DHBV-DNA level in the group of Lip-M (10 mg/kg) markedly reduced (0.56±0.26 vs0.95±0.38, t = 5.26, P= 0.003<0.05. 0.55±0.25 vs 0.95±0.38, t = 5.52, P= 0.003<0.05), and the difference was significant as compared with the control (0.56±0.26 vs 0.95±0.27, t = 2.37, P = 0.042<0.05. 0.55±0.25 vs 0.89±0.18, t = 2.55, P= 0.031<0.05), but not significant as compared with the group of matrine (20 mg/kg). After withdrawl of the drug for 3 d, the levels of DHBV-DNA did not relapse in both groups of Lip-M. CONCLUSION: Lip-M can evidently inhibit the replication of hepatitis B virus In vitro and in viva, its anti-HBV effect is better than that of matrine.
