本文运用"求真—务实"的连续统评价模式,对林语堂My Country and My People两个中文译本进行比较研究。研究发现,两位译者在具体翻译时,总体表现为"求真"向"务实"的滑动,并努力在"求真"和"...本文运用"求真—务实"的连续统评价模式,对林语堂My Country and My People两个中文译本进行比较研究。研究发现,两位译者在具体翻译时,总体表现为"求真"向"务实"的滑动,并努力在"求真"和"务实"间保持自己理想中的平衡。对"求真"和"务实"两者之间平衡度的不同把握导致了两种版本的差异。展开更多
以《飞鸟集》的郑振铎和冯唐译本为研究对象,深入探讨译者在翻译过程中的“求真”与“务实”行为。通过对两个译本的研究,分析发现在翻译风格方面,冯译自身风格凌驾于原作气韵之上;在语言运用方面,冯译大胆创新,不惜改动原词,郑译典雅含...以《飞鸟集》的郑振铎和冯唐译本为研究对象,深入探讨译者在翻译过程中的“求真”与“务实”行为。通过对两个译本的研究,分析发现在翻译风格方面,冯译自身风格凌驾于原作气韵之上;在语言运用方面,冯译大胆创新,不惜改动原词,郑译典雅含蓄,用词准确规范;在文化素养方面,冯译注重个人文化理解和情感体验;在译文准确度方面,郑译更胜一筹,忠实传达原文意境与精神。本研究有助于译者在翻译实践中把握“求真–务实”连续统的平衡点,以更好地传达原文思想和感情,同时满足读者期待和社会需求。Taking Zheng Zhenduo’s and Feng Tang’s translations of Stray Birds as research subjects, this study delves into translators’ “truth-seeking” and “utility-attaining” during the translation process. By analyzing these two translations, it is revealed that in terms of translation style, Feng Tang’s personal style overshadows the original’s charm;in language use, Feng Tang is keen on creation, even altering original words, while Zheng’s translation is elegant and implicit with precise and standardized wording. In terms of cultural literacy, Feng’s translation emphasizes personal cultural understanding and emotional experience;in translation accuracy, Zheng is more faithful in conveying the original’s mood and spirit. This research aims at helping translators in striking a balance between the “Truth-seeking-Utility-attaining evaluative model of continuum” in translation practice, thereby better conveying the original’s thoughts and emotions while meeting readers’ expectations and social demands.展开更多
《红楼梦》谶语文学色彩浓厚,形式丰富多样,具有厚重的文化底蕴和鲜明的民族特色。译学界目前从译者行为视角出发探究其谶语英译的研究尚不多见,本文基于译者行为批评理论,借助艾克西拉文化专有项翻译策略,将红楼谶分为四类,从译内和译...《红楼梦》谶语文学色彩浓厚,形式丰富多样,具有厚重的文化底蕴和鲜明的民族特色。译学界目前从译者行为视角出发探究其谶语英译的研究尚不多见,本文基于译者行为批评理论,借助艾克西拉文化专有项翻译策略,将红楼谶分为四类,从译内和译外两个角度分析杨宪益、霍克斯两家译本隐藏在《红楼梦》谶语英译策略背后的译者行为,进而探究其社会性动因,旨在说明在翻译过程中根据翻译目的把握好“求真”与“务实”的平衡是《红楼梦》谶语英译的关键,以期对中国古典文学作品“走出去”提供一定借鉴。The prophecies in Hong Lou Meng have rich literary color and diverse forms, as well as profound cultural deposits and distinct national characteristics. In the field of translation, there are few studies on the English translation of the prophecies in it from the perspective of the translator’s behavior. Based on the translator behavior criticism, this paper classifies the prophecies in Hong Lou Meng into four categories with the help of the translation strategy of Aixelá’s Culture-Specific items, then analyzes the translator’s behavior hidden behind the English translation strategies of the versions translated by Yan Xianyi and Hawkes from both the in-translation and out-of-translation aspects, and then explores its social motivation. The final purpose is to show that the balance between “truth-seeking” and “utility-attaining” is the key to the English translation of the prophecies in Hong Lou Meng in the process of translation, and to provide some reference for Chinese classical literature works to “going global”.展开更多
文摘本文运用"求真—务实"的连续统评价模式,对林语堂My Country and My People两个中文译本进行比较研究。研究发现,两位译者在具体翻译时,总体表现为"求真"向"务实"的滑动,并努力在"求真"和"务实"间保持自己理想中的平衡。对"求真"和"务实"两者之间平衡度的不同把握导致了两种版本的差异。
文摘以《飞鸟集》的郑振铎和冯唐译本为研究对象,深入探讨译者在翻译过程中的“求真”与“务实”行为。通过对两个译本的研究,分析发现在翻译风格方面,冯译自身风格凌驾于原作气韵之上;在语言运用方面,冯译大胆创新,不惜改动原词,郑译典雅含蓄,用词准确规范;在文化素养方面,冯译注重个人文化理解和情感体验;在译文准确度方面,郑译更胜一筹,忠实传达原文意境与精神。本研究有助于译者在翻译实践中把握“求真–务实”连续统的平衡点,以更好地传达原文思想和感情,同时满足读者期待和社会需求。Taking Zheng Zhenduo’s and Feng Tang’s translations of Stray Birds as research subjects, this study delves into translators’ “truth-seeking” and “utility-attaining” during the translation process. By analyzing these two translations, it is revealed that in terms of translation style, Feng Tang’s personal style overshadows the original’s charm;in language use, Feng Tang is keen on creation, even altering original words, while Zheng’s translation is elegant and implicit with precise and standardized wording. In terms of cultural literacy, Feng’s translation emphasizes personal cultural understanding and emotional experience;in translation accuracy, Zheng is more faithful in conveying the original’s mood and spirit. This research aims at helping translators in striking a balance between the “Truth-seeking-Utility-attaining evaluative model of continuum” in translation practice, thereby better conveying the original’s thoughts and emotions while meeting readers’ expectations and social demands.
文摘《红楼梦》谶语文学色彩浓厚,形式丰富多样,具有厚重的文化底蕴和鲜明的民族特色。译学界目前从译者行为视角出发探究其谶语英译的研究尚不多见,本文基于译者行为批评理论,借助艾克西拉文化专有项翻译策略,将红楼谶分为四类,从译内和译外两个角度分析杨宪益、霍克斯两家译本隐藏在《红楼梦》谶语英译策略背后的译者行为,进而探究其社会性动因,旨在说明在翻译过程中根据翻译目的把握好“求真”与“务实”的平衡是《红楼梦》谶语英译的关键,以期对中国古典文学作品“走出去”提供一定借鉴。The prophecies in Hong Lou Meng have rich literary color and diverse forms, as well as profound cultural deposits and distinct national characteristics. In the field of translation, there are few studies on the English translation of the prophecies in it from the perspective of the translator’s behavior. Based on the translator behavior criticism, this paper classifies the prophecies in Hong Lou Meng into four categories with the help of the translation strategy of Aixelá’s Culture-Specific items, then analyzes the translator’s behavior hidden behind the English translation strategies of the versions translated by Yan Xianyi and Hawkes from both the in-translation and out-of-translation aspects, and then explores its social motivation. The final purpose is to show that the balance between “truth-seeking” and “utility-attaining” is the key to the English translation of the prophecies in Hong Lou Meng in the process of translation, and to provide some reference for Chinese classical literature works to “going global”.
