“Naming of Parts”and“plato told”are two poems written respectively by Henry Reed and E.E.Cummings during the Second World War.“Naming of Parts”depicts the opposition and assimilation of two voices in the poem wh...“Naming of Parts”and“plato told”are two poems written respectively by Henry Reed and E.E.Cummings during the Second World War.“Naming of Parts”depicts the opposition and assimilation of two voices in the poem while“plato told”features the contrast between the silenced voices and an accentuated voice in the poem.The two poems suggest that submitting oneself to the speech pattern typical of military personnel leads to the loss of one’s voice,individuality,and ultimately one’s life.Overall,these two poems reveal the connection between a person’s voice and individuality in a war and demonstrate a clear antiwar attitude.展开更多
海德格尔的存在论美学来源于他对柏拉图美学的现象学阐释。针对柏拉图《理想国》中艺术与真的关系,海德格尔指出艺术并不处于与真的“分裂”关系之中,而是在指向存在之真时具有等级意义上的归属关系;进一步,海德格尔通过对《斐德若篇》...海德格尔的存在论美学来源于他对柏拉图美学的现象学阐释。针对柏拉图《理想国》中艺术与真的关系,海德格尔指出艺术并不处于与真的“分裂”关系之中,而是在指向存在之真时具有等级意义上的归属关系;进一步,海德格尔通过对《斐德若篇》中“美是那最耀显、最令人出神的”进行现象学阐释,指出美是“对存在之观照”(Seinsblick)的赢获和保持,因而是架接具体存在者的“显象”(Schein)与源初的“存在”(Sein)之间的桥梁。在重建美与真共属关系基础上,海德格尔提出了其存在论的美学命题:“美是存在的耀显(Scheinen des Seins)”,美在于现象的自身生成。展开更多
Literature and aesthetics have similarities,both of which are a kind of ideology and can endow us a satisfaction of people's spiritual need and purify and sublimate people's mind.And there is something interwo...Literature and aesthetics have similarities,both of which are a kind of ideology and can endow us a satisfaction of people's spiritual need and purify and sublimate people's mind.And there is something interwoven in the two disciplines.Plato,as a early western literary theorist,has also delved into the discipline of aesthetics.This article is a general analysis of his aesthetic ideas in his works.展开更多
According to relevant lectures in the Vorlesungenüber die Geschichte der Philosophie,this paper is trying to illustrate how Hegel understands and explains Plato’s dialectic.Hegel,to a large extent,views his dial...According to relevant lectures in the Vorlesungenüber die Geschichte der Philosophie,this paper is trying to illustrate how Hegel understands and explains Plato’s dialectic.Hegel,to a large extent,views his dialectic as a continuation of the starting point of Plato’s dialectic,but Hegel develops Plato’s"negative dialectic"into his"speculative dialectic"by absorbing Neo-Platonists’explanation,especially Proklos’.The essential difference between the two is that Plato’s dialectic,in essence,is satisfied with an external comparison of abstract determinations,and thus can’t bring forth logic connections of categories and obtain an internal development of categories in an organic structure of system.展开更多
文摘“Naming of Parts”and“plato told”are two poems written respectively by Henry Reed and E.E.Cummings during the Second World War.“Naming of Parts”depicts the opposition and assimilation of two voices in the poem while“plato told”features the contrast between the silenced voices and an accentuated voice in the poem.The two poems suggest that submitting oneself to the speech pattern typical of military personnel leads to the loss of one’s voice,individuality,and ultimately one’s life.Overall,these two poems reveal the connection between a person’s voice and individuality in a war and demonstrate a clear antiwar attitude.
文摘海德格尔的存在论美学来源于他对柏拉图美学的现象学阐释。针对柏拉图《理想国》中艺术与真的关系,海德格尔指出艺术并不处于与真的“分裂”关系之中,而是在指向存在之真时具有等级意义上的归属关系;进一步,海德格尔通过对《斐德若篇》中“美是那最耀显、最令人出神的”进行现象学阐释,指出美是“对存在之观照”(Seinsblick)的赢获和保持,因而是架接具体存在者的“显象”(Schein)与源初的“存在”(Sein)之间的桥梁。在重建美与真共属关系基础上,海德格尔提出了其存在论的美学命题:“美是存在的耀显(Scheinen des Seins)”,美在于现象的自身生成。
文摘Literature and aesthetics have similarities,both of which are a kind of ideology and can endow us a satisfaction of people's spiritual need and purify and sublimate people's mind.And there is something interwoven in the two disciplines.Plato,as a early western literary theorist,has also delved into the discipline of aesthetics.This article is a general analysis of his aesthetic ideas in his works.
文摘According to relevant lectures in the Vorlesungenüber die Geschichte der Philosophie,this paper is trying to illustrate how Hegel understands and explains Plato’s dialectic.Hegel,to a large extent,views his dialectic as a continuation of the starting point of Plato’s dialectic,but Hegel develops Plato’s"negative dialectic"into his"speculative dialectic"by absorbing Neo-Platonists’explanation,especially Proklos’.The essential difference between the two is that Plato’s dialectic,in essence,is satisfied with an external comparison of abstract determinations,and thus can’t bring forth logic connections of categories and obtain an internal development of categories in an organic structure of system.
