Respiratory Distress Resulting from Gastroesophageal Reflux Is not Asthma,but Laryngotracheal Irritation,Spasm,even Suffocation

ESPITE the strong association between gastroesophageal reflux disease （GERD） and asthma has been undisputedly established and widely recognized by experts in advanced countries. Yet few topics in medicine are as controversial as the causal relationship between GERD and asthma： some argue that GERD causes asthma, while others think the other way around is true, still quite a few believe that bronchodilator medications are to blame. This controversy continues to be a conundrum or more piece of the puzzle.1 We would like to share two thoughts which might be a belated revelation with scholars and experts and invite them for further cooperative studies： the GERD-derived respiratory distress is not asthma, but GERD pure and simple; and the pathogenesis of respiratory distress is not asthma, but laryngotracheal irritation/spasm/suffocation.

喘息灵胶囊原方与去除马兜铃新方的止咳功效比较

目的:观察喘息灵胶囊原方(含马兜铃)和新方(不含马兜铃)的止咳功效差异。方法:选用小鼠氨水引咳法和豚鼠枸橼酸引咳法,采用生物检定6点法比较两方的止咳作用并计算其效价比(R)。结果:两方三个剂量(原方0.75g/kg、1.5g/kg、3.0g/kg,新方0.68g/kg、1.3g/kg、2.7g/kg)均能明显延长动物咳嗽潜伏期时间,减少咳嗽次数。原方与新方计算比较,小鼠氨水引咳法延长咳嗽潜伏期时间R(95%可信限)=0.97(0.94～1.00),减少咳嗽次数R(95%可信限)=1.05(0.73～1.36);豚鼠枸橼酸引咳法延长咳嗽潜伏期时间R(95%可信限)=0.62(0.46～0.77),减少咳嗽次数R(95%可信限)=0.73(0.28～1.19)。结论:喘息灵胶囊原方与去除马兜铃新方均有明显的止咳功效,两方的效价大致相当。

语言游戏中的诗意革命——读余怒诗集《主与客》

在2008年,给诗人余怒的《主与客》单独写过一个急就章式的读后感。说是急就章,因为写的是针对一首诗的一时感觉,感觉是真实的,也是稍纵即逝的。在这之后,再看余怒的一系列短诗、组诗和长诗,如《诗学》、《饥饿之年》、《喘息》,每一组作品都能给人以新的惊喜。中年余怒依然保持着青年余怒那股锐劲。在锐劲之余,又多了一份通透和日常性。现在重读《主与客》,理解自是不同,而诗集中有不少诗让我更加喜爱。

关于诗集《转瞬》及《物物铭六部》的几句话

1.诗集《转瞬》是《物物铭六部》的第二部。后者包括《蜗牛》《转瞬》《鳗》《喘息》《游隼》《耳鸣》等六部诗集,两两相对,风格相左,近1500首。除了《喘息》几年前写作了一部分,《蜗牛》已经完成之外,其他的都是我以后的写作计划。这六部诗集是截然不同的或者说互斥相反的几个作品。