Objective： Radiation therapy is an important component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal carcinoma. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy requires the precise definition of the target volume. ...Objective： Radiation therapy is an important component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal carcinoma. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy requires the precise definition of the target volume. We aimed to compare the treatment results and radiation toxicities between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy （3D-CRT） and conventional radiotherapy （CR） for patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Methods： From June 2004 to December 2006, a random study was performed on 106 patients treated with 3D-CRT or CR, 53 patients in each group. The patients in CR group received conventional radiotherapy in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 66-70 Gy in 6.5 or 7 weeks. The patients in 3D-CRT group were treated by 3D-CRT in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 64-70 Gy in 6 weeks. The local control rates, survival rates and radiation toxicities for the two groups were investigated. Results： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates were 83.0% and 60.4% in 3D-CRT group and 64.2% （x^2 = 4.853, P = 0.028） and 32.1% （x^2 = 9.812, P = 0.002） in CR group. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 73.6% and 50.9% in 3D-CRT group and 54.7% （x^2 = 4.102, P = 0.043） and 32.1% （x^2 = 3.886, P = 0.049） in CR group. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in radiation toxicities. Conclusien： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates and survival rates of patients with esophageal carcinoma treated by 3D-CRT is superior to CR. However, longer-term results and radiation toxicity need further study which involves more patients and prolonged follow-up.展开更多
文摘Objective： Radiation therapy is an important component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal carcinoma. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy requires the precise definition of the target volume. We aimed to compare the treatment results and radiation toxicities between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy （3D-CRT） and conventional radiotherapy （CR） for patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Methods： From June 2004 to December 2006, a random study was performed on 106 patients treated with 3D-CRT or CR, 53 patients in each group. The patients in CR group received conventional radiotherapy in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 66-70 Gy in 6.5 or 7 weeks. The patients in 3D-CRT group were treated by 3D-CRT in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 64-70 Gy in 6 weeks. The local control rates, survival rates and radiation toxicities for the two groups were investigated. Results： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates were 83.0% and 60.4% in 3D-CRT group and 64.2% （x^2 = 4.853, P = 0.028） and 32.1% （x^2 = 9.812, P = 0.002） in CR group. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 73.6% and 50.9% in 3D-CRT group and 54.7% （x^2 = 4.102, P = 0.043） and 32.1% （x^2 = 3.886, P = 0.049） in CR group. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in radiation toxicities. Conclusien： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates and survival rates of patients with esophageal carcinoma treated by 3D-CRT is superior to CR. However, longer-term results and radiation toxicity need further study which involves more patients and prolonged follow-up.
