Experimental Study on Full-Surface Buckling of Variable Curvature Cylindrical Shell Using Multi-camera 3D-DIC System

To achieve full-surface strain measurement of variable curvature objects,a 360°3D digital image correlation(DIC)system is proposed.The measurement system consists of four double-camera systems,which capture the object’s entire surface from multiple angles,enabling comprehensive full-surface measurement.To increase the stitching quality,a hierarchical coordinate matching method is proposed.Initially,a 3D rigid body calibration auxiliary block is employed to track motion trajectory,which enables preliminary matching of four 3D-DIC sub-systems.Subsequently,secondary precise matching is performed based on feature points on the test specimen’s surface.Through the hierarchical coordinate matching method,the local 3D coordinate systems of each double-camera system are unified into a global coordinate system,achieving 3D surface reconstruction of the variable curvature cylindrical shell,and error analysis is conducted on the results.Furthermore,axial compression buckling experiment is conducted to measure the displacement and strain fields on the cylindrical shell’s surface.The experimental results are compared with the finite element analysis,validating the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed multi-camera 3D-DIC measuring system.

全站仪RDM法与3D量测法量测隧道变形精度对比

根据测量学原理和误差传播定律,分析了全站仪自由设站对边量测(RDM)法和三维坐标(3D)量测法,建立了2种量测法的隧道变形精度分析模型,利用中误差评价隧道变形量测精度,推导了2种方法量测隧道变形的中误差计算公式,并以某三车道公路隧道为例,对2种方法的量测精度进行了对比和验证;RDM法通过三角高程测量原理和三角余弦定理得出任意点之间的水平距离、高差和斜距,根据任意测点之间的三角几何关系得到隧道变形;3D量测法从任意观测点观测若干已知点的方向和距离,通过坐标变换计算各测点坐标,根据各测点坐标得到隧道变形。分析结果表明:采用RDM法和3D量测法量测隧道拱顶下沉的精度评价公式相同,而量测隧道水平收敛的精度评价公式不同,RDM法的精度优于3D量测法,且随着全站仪到量测断面距离的增加,差值逐渐增大,当距离为100 m时,两者精度差值已增大至0.43 mm;在三车道公路隧道中,当距离为40~60m时,2种方法量测隧道水平收敛的精度均为最高,RDM法可达0.61~0.68mm,3D量测法可达0.78~0.84mm;RDM法和3D量测法量测的隧道拱顶下沉曲线平滑、圆顺,拟合度都大于0.95,而在量测隧道净空收敛方面,RDM法的曲线拟合度大于0.9,3D量测法的曲线拟合度小于0.9,因此,RDM法量测精度优于3D量测法。