期刊文献+
共找到9篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
中、美贸易失衡对我国中小型外贸企业的影响及对策分析
1
作者 沈蕾 《特区经济》 北大核心 2008年第4期93-94,共2页
中、美贸易失衡不仅对人民币升值产生了压力,也对我国外贸企业带来了不小的影响。本文通过分析中、美贸易失衡原因及其对中小型外贸企业的影响,指出在全球化背景下,这些企业要想在更加动荡的国际经济、金融市场环境下生存、发展,就必须... 中、美贸易失衡不仅对人民币升值产生了压力,也对我国外贸企业带来了不小的影响。本文通过分析中、美贸易失衡原因及其对中小型外贸企业的影响,指出在全球化背景下,这些企业要想在更加动荡的国际经济、金融市场环境下生存、发展,就必须及时调整外贸战略,提高自主创新能力,丰富规避风险的手段,增强企业的综合竞争力。 展开更多
关键词 中、美贸易 失衡 小型外贸企业 汇率
下载PDF
中、美贸易摩擦及对策分析 被引量:1
2
作者 张煜 《特区经济》 北大核心 2010年第4期100-101,共2页
随着中、美两国间经贸往来的不断加深,贸易额持续增长,贸易结构不断变化,与此同时两国贸易摩擦也不断增多。日益增多的贸易摩擦对中、美经贸关系的顺利发展产生越来越大的负面影响,如何应对贸易摩擦受到了人们的广泛关注。本文简述了中... 随着中、美两国间经贸往来的不断加深,贸易额持续增长,贸易结构不断变化,与此同时两国贸易摩擦也不断增多。日益增多的贸易摩擦对中、美经贸关系的顺利发展产生越来越大的负面影响,如何应对贸易摩擦受到了人们的广泛关注。本文简述了中美贸易摩擦的现状,对中、美贸易摩擦的原因、中国的应对措施等方面进行了细致的阐述。 展开更多
关键词 中、美贸易摩擦 特点 贸易摩擦原因 应对措施
下载PDF
基于BP神经网络的中、美贸易预测研究
3
作者 曾令雄 梁雪春 《特区经济》 北大核心 2008年第4期95-96,共2页
根据中、美贸易的经济研究背景,分析中、美贸易重要影响指标,对其进行线性回归分析,发现中、美贸易额与各指标之间不是简单的线性相关,且各指标之间存在相互关系,所以不能用单一的线性回归模型进行预测。而BP神经网络具有非线性映射、... 根据中、美贸易的经济研究背景,分析中、美贸易重要影响指标,对其进行线性回归分析,发现中、美贸易额与各指标之间不是简单的线性相关,且各指标之间存在相互关系,所以不能用单一的线性回归模型进行预测。而BP神经网络具有非线性映射、自适应学习和良好的泛化能力等特征,运用BP神经网络模型对中、美贸易进行实证预测,大大提高了预测精度,取得了较好的效果。 展开更多
关键词 中、美贸易 BP神经网络 多元自回归
下载PDF
中、美纺织品贸易摩擦的利益相关者分析
4
作者 赵君丽 《特区经济》 北大核心 2007年第9期93-94,共2页
贸易的政治因素和经济因素经常被单独分析,Freeman的利益相关者分析成功地实现了两者的综合。本文通过利益相关者方法分析中、美纺织品贸易摩擦问题,分析表明:贸易摩擦牵涉到各方利益,贸易摩擦的解决最终是各方政治经济利益的均衡。因... 贸易的政治因素和经济因素经常被单独分析,Freeman的利益相关者分析成功地实现了两者的综合。本文通过利益相关者方法分析中、美纺织品贸易摩擦问题,分析表明:贸易摩擦牵涉到各方利益,贸易摩擦的解决最终是各方政治经济利益的均衡。因此对于中方,不应只站在自己的角度,而应站在双方视角看待和解决纺织品贸易摩擦问题,对症下药,提高对美贸易政策的有效性,具体可采取对外直接投资,开辟多元化的出口市场,争取美国国内零售协会的帮助和自愿出口限额等措施。 展开更多
关键词 中、美贸易摩擦 纺织品 利益相关者分析
下载PDF
Chinese and US Economies in Comparison and Interaction:Now and Future as China Economist Surveys 被引量:5
5
作者 李钢 李欧美 《China Economist》 2017年第4期110-133,共24页
China Economist has continuously carried out surveys among economists and this round of survey focuses on comparison and interactions between China's and the United States' economies. The result of the survey shows ... China Economist has continuously carried out surveys among economists and this round of survey focuses on comparison and interactions between China's and the United States' economies. The result of the survey shows that economists are generally optimistic about the outlook of both countries'economies. Respondents believed that great differences exist in the components of industrial competitiveness of China and the US; while the US leads in terms of talent, creativity, social system, industrial system integrity and financing, cost is the biggest barrier to improvement in US competitiveness. In comparison, China leads in infrastructure, cost competitiveness and government driving force but inadequate technology is the biggest barrier to improvement in China's competitiveness. Respondents believed that in the coming 20years, China's economic growth will be 5.2% and US growth will be 2.4%. Around 2034, China's economic aggregate will equal the US level but it will take over 60 years for China to catch up with the US in terms of per capita GDP. China's manufacturing technology will equal the US level around 2045. More than 62% of economists believed that the Trump administration will effectively re-shore manufacturing and the average score they give to Trump's "first 100 days "" in office is 76 points. More than 61% of economists considered it unlikely that a serious trade war will break out between China and the US. They generally believed that China and the US cooperate and compete with each other and that China-US trade enjoys great potential to grow. According to the survey, respondents are more confident about China's debt sustainability in comparison with the US. 展开更多
关键词 China-US interaction China-US trade China-US cooperation COMPETITIVENESS Trump administration
下载PDF
Territory-based and Ownershipbased Gains from Trade under the Global Production Network——An Empirical Study Based on China
6
作者 黎峰 《China Economist》 2014年第6期85-100,共16页
Under global production network,export cannot represent a country's gains from trade,and territory-based gains from trade refer to the remainder of export after deducting the input of intermediate goods and re-exp... Under global production network,export cannot represent a country's gains from trade,and territory-based gains from trade refer to the remainder of export after deducting the input of intermediate goods and re-export after value-added return.Ownership-based gains from trade refer to the remainder of territory-based gains from trade after further deducting the trade in value added(TVA) realized through the inflow of foreign factors.By creating a multicountry input and output model,this paper calculates the territory-based gains from trade,ownership-based gains from trade,and territory-based gains from trade for foreign countries realized through China's export,as well as valueadded return and territory-based gains from trade for foreign countries realized through China's import.This paper has arrived at the following conclusions:behind China's status as the largest goods exporting country in the world,most of Chinese exports contribute to the gains of foreign countries;value addition for foreign countries realized through China's export and value-added return realized through China's import mostly come from Taiwan region,Japan and South Korea in East Asia;a considerable part of gains from trade for the United States realized through China-US trade is achieved through indirect trade. 展开更多
关键词 global production network territory-based gains from trade ownership-based gains from trade gains from trade for foreign countries
下载PDF
Recalculating Sino-US Trade Balance Using the Ownership-Based Statistical Method
7
作者 姜鸿 张艺影 梅雪松 《China Economist》 2014年第5期58-65,共8页
Using the trade statistical method based on asset ownership,this paper recalculated Sino-US bilateral trade volume and the result indicates that against traditional trade statistics,Chinese exports to the US reduced b... Using the trade statistical method based on asset ownership,this paper recalculated Sino-US bilateral trade volume and the result indicates that against traditional trade statistics,Chinese exports to the US reduced by an average of 51%while Chinese imports from the US increased by an average of 41%between 2004 and 2010.Balance of trade is in the range between US$2,189 billion of deficit and US$12.77 billion of surplus on the part of China,which are far smaller than the balance of Sino-US trade calculated by traditional statistical method.In order to reflect the real scale of China's foreign trade and effectively respond to Sino-US trade frictions,it is necessary for China to establish its trade statistics system based on asset ownership. 展开更多
关键词 asset ownership cross-border trade Sino-US trade
下载PDF
Trumponomics and China-US Economic and Trade Relations
8
作者 Li Wei Zhang Yuhuan 《Contemporary International Relations》 2017年第2期51-66,共16页
Since he took office, the new US president, Donald Trump, has unveiled his broad economic policy--now called Trumponomics. It emphasizes neoliberalism at home, less government regulations, more growth and weakening th... Since he took office, the new US president, Donald Trump, has unveiled his broad economic policy--now called Trumponomics. It emphasizes neoliberalism at home, less government regulations, more growth and weakening the welfare state. Intemationally, Trumponomics embraces protectionism and nativism with a focus on US economic interests. Trumponomics caters to the lower-middle classes, a reflection of the country's current economic and diplomatic challenges. Trumponomics will bring uncertainty to China-US economic and trade relations. China should carefully study the policies of the Trump administration and prepare contingency plans. 展开更多
关键词 Trumponomics China-US economic and trade relations major power relations trade war
下载PDF
Sino-European Trade Competition in Latin America and the Caribbean 被引量:1
9
作者 Wioletta Nowak 《Chinese Business Review》 2014年第9期552-561,共10页
The article studies trade in goods between China and the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries and between the European Union (EU) and LAC during the years from 2000 to 2013. From the beginning of the 21st ... The article studies trade in goods between China and the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries and between the European Union (EU) and LAC during the years from 2000 to 2013. From the beginning of the 21st century, big changes in LAC's trade patterns have been observed. The article contains possible explanation of them. The analysis is based on the ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) data. Merchandise trade between China and LAC grew significantly over the period from 2000 to 2013. In 2013, the value of merchandise exports from China was higher than from the EU-28 in the case of 12 LAC countries. Chinese imports of goods surpassed the European ones in five countries in the region. In order to increase its exports of manufactured goods and imports of natural resources and agricultural commodities, China combines trade arrangements with foreign aid policy. Besides, a rapid development of bilateral diplomatic ties between China and LAC is observed. The EU-LAC trade relations have worsened during the last decade mainly due to financial crisis and development of the EU-Asia trade relations. 展开更多
关键词 China merchandise trade foreign aid European Union (EU)
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部