在反倾销实践中,印度是W T O范围内第一大反倾销调查发起国,中国则是第一大反倾销调查被诉国。文章以W T O反倾销规则作为参照,对中、印两国的反倾销制度进行了比较。中、印反倾销制度上的差别主要体现在:第一,印度反倾销制度更着重于...在反倾销实践中,印度是W T O范围内第一大反倾销调查发起国,中国则是第一大反倾销调查被诉国。文章以W T O反倾销规则作为参照,对中、印两国的反倾销制度进行了比较。中、印反倾销制度上的差别主要体现在:第一,印度反倾销制度更着重于本国产业保护,而中国反倾销制度更重于平衡各方利益;第二,印度规则中超越W T O规则所作的关于非市场经济国家的规定,是中国成为其第一大反倾销申诉对象的重要制度原因;第三,印度反倾销制度关于主管机构职责的规定更为具体详细,在一定程度上加强了主管机构在反倾销制度运行上的作为;第四,印度反倾销制度的成型比中国早10多年,反倾销实践的时间更长。展开更多
Chinese products are major targets of the European Union （ EU）＇s anti-dumping measures. By making an empirical analysis using official data published by the Statistical Office of the European Commission （ Eurostat...Chinese products are major targets of the European Union （ EU）＇s anti-dumping measures. By making an empirical analysis using official data published by the Statistical Office of the European Commission （ Eurostat）, the authors conclude the EU＇s anti-dumping actions may not necessarity be helpful, Instead, the actions impose a high cost on EU consummers and make EU enterprises＇ costs rise.Eventually, Chinese enterprises will suffer a heavy toll and EU enterprises will also suffer from weakened competiveness.展开更多
This paper presents an empirical study of how U.S. antidumping （AD） actions against China affect China ＇s inward and outward foreign direct investment （FDI） based on the international division of labor model. Our...This paper presents an empirical study of how U.S. antidumping （AD） actions against China affect China ＇s inward and outward foreign direct investment （FDI） based on the international division of labor model. Our findings are as follows： （1） The U.S.-China trade deficit has been widened by both downstream firms in China established through vertical FDI and also inward enterprises established through horizontal FDI. The widening deficit in turn exacerbates vitriolic complaints in the U.S. about injury to its industries. This will lead to further U.S. AD actions discouraging FDI in China. （2） U.S. AD cases against China have negatively impacted China＇s metal manufacturing, chemical and, especially, textile industries in terms of exports and inward FDI. From 2004 to 2009, the share of total inward FDI going to China＇s manufacturing sector has dropped drastically by almost 20 percent. This supports predictions made using the international division of labor model. （3） With U.S. AD actions against Chinese products on the rise, Chinese firms chose not to circumvent such barriers through outward FDI in the U.S. but rather through outward FDI in tax havens. Such a pattern of outward FDI is not helpful for China to establish its own successful industrial development model.展开更多
文摘在反倾销实践中,印度是W T O范围内第一大反倾销调查发起国,中国则是第一大反倾销调查被诉国。文章以W T O反倾销规则作为参照,对中、印两国的反倾销制度进行了比较。中、印反倾销制度上的差别主要体现在:第一,印度反倾销制度更着重于本国产业保护,而中国反倾销制度更重于平衡各方利益;第二,印度规则中超越W T O规则所作的关于非市场经济国家的规定,是中国成为其第一大反倾销申诉对象的重要制度原因;第三,印度反倾销制度关于主管机构职责的规定更为具体详细,在一定程度上加强了主管机构在反倾销制度运行上的作为;第四,印度反倾销制度的成型比中国早10多年,反倾销实践的时间更长。
文摘Chinese products are major targets of the European Union （ EU）＇s anti-dumping measures. By making an empirical analysis using official data published by the Statistical Office of the European Commission （ Eurostat）, the authors conclude the EU＇s anti-dumping actions may not necessarity be helpful, Instead, the actions impose a high cost on EU consummers and make EU enterprises＇ costs rise.Eventually, Chinese enterprises will suffer a heavy toll and EU enterprises will also suffer from weakened competiveness.
基金This paper is sponsored by the Chinese National Social Science Foundation Project （grant llBJY142）, Chinese MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities （grant 08JJD790138）, Shanghai Pujiang Program Project （grant 2011C）, Shu Guang Project of Shanghai Educational Development Foundation （grant llSGl0） and 985＇Third Period Project of Fudan University （grant 2011SHKXZD002）.
文摘This paper presents an empirical study of how U.S. antidumping （AD） actions against China affect China ＇s inward and outward foreign direct investment （FDI） based on the international division of labor model. Our findings are as follows： （1） The U.S.-China trade deficit has been widened by both downstream firms in China established through vertical FDI and also inward enterprises established through horizontal FDI. The widening deficit in turn exacerbates vitriolic complaints in the U.S. about injury to its industries. This will lead to further U.S. AD actions discouraging FDI in China. （2） U.S. AD cases against China have negatively impacted China＇s metal manufacturing, chemical and, especially, textile industries in terms of exports and inward FDI. From 2004 to 2009, the share of total inward FDI going to China＇s manufacturing sector has dropped drastically by almost 20 percent. This supports predictions made using the international division of labor model. （3） With U.S. AD actions against Chinese products on the rise, Chinese firms chose not to circumvent such barriers through outward FDI in the U.S. but rather through outward FDI in tax havens. Such a pattern of outward FDI is not helpful for China to establish its own successful industrial development model.
