“电子书包”中文研究论文的内容分析研究

电子书包在国内已经走过了十多个年头,为了准确地认识电子书包的研究现状与发展趋势,本文从中国知网(CNKI)检索出了我国有关电子书包研究的学术论文50篇,并从论文数量、研究内容、研究群体和期刊来源四个方面进行内容分析。最后,对在研究中发现的问题进行思考并提出了三点建议,期望能促进我国电子书包研究的发展。

识别并浅析明显学术造假的中文临床研究论文——基于中国知网学术期刊论文库

目的:在中国知网学术期刊论文库中筛查明显学术造假的中文临床研究论文(即研究男科疾病或妇科疾病的研究同时纳入了两种性别的患者)。方法:以词组①“篇名”=“前列腺”and“全文”=“女”;②“篇名”=“子宫”and“全文”=“男”;③“篇名”=“卵巢”and“全文”=“男”检索中国知网学术期刊论文库,下载并筛查被引次数排名前1000的中文临床研究论文,以及发表时间在“2021年4月1日—2024年3月4日”的中文临床研究论文。结果:本研究共识别出73篇明显学术造假的临床研究论文,均未被撤稿,且除了造假之处外,研究质量也较差;分别发表于52本期刊,部分(19/52,36.5%)期刊为核心期刊;涉及来自84所机构的166位作者,其中大多数(62/84,73.8%)机构为三级医院。结论:中文临床研究论文中学术造假的现象远比我们想象的严重,亟须从来源、发表期刊、出版后监督等环节入手,全面整治中文学术不端论文,净化学术生态。

The Construction of a Discourse System for Literature Research in Contemporary China

The construction of the literature research discourse in the seven decades since the foundation of the PRC has shown an upward spiral, from 'state/collective discourse' to 'society/individual discourse' and thence to 'world/human discourse.' These related but different discourses have worked together to facilitate literary writing and literature research. During the last 70 years of literature research, the Marxist theory of literature and art has always played a guiding role. Having close links with Chinese literary practice, Marxist theory has had a fundamental impact on the construction of the Chinese literature research discourse system. The emergence of 'state/collective discourse,' 'society/individual discourse' and 'world/human discourse' is an integral, historical, logical and dynamic process. Chinese literature research discourse should be constantly innovated and developed with a vision that looks to the world and the future, in order to contribute Chinese wisdom to dialogues between different academic discourses in the world and thus demonstrate the unique value of Chinese academic research in the humanities.