本文针对高校基建工程招投标过程中广泛采用的最低评标价法,进行了深入分析。尽管最低评标价法使得评标工作更加易于操作,节约了人力、物力和财力,但也带来了诸多问题,如竞争环境建设力度不够、市场竞争机制不完善、合理最低价使用不够...本文针对高校基建工程招投标过程中广泛采用的最低评标价法,进行了深入分析。尽管最低评标价法使得评标工作更加易于操作,节约了人力、物力和财力,但也带来了诸多问题,如竞争环境建设力度不够、市场竞争机制不完善、合理最低价使用不够规范、造价控制存在不确定性、以及招标队伍建设薄弱等。本文以高校工程招标为例,详细剖析了最低价中标存在的具体问题及其原因,并提出了相应的防范措施,包括营造良好有序的招投标环境、建立完善的项目库立项管理制度、开展工程项目前期调研论证、依法规范招标组织工作以及加强招标队伍建设等。通过这些措施,旨在提高高校基建工程招投标的公平性和有效性,降低风险,保障工程质量。This paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the lowest bid evaluation method widely used in the bidding process of university infrastructure projects. Although the lowest bid evaluation method makes the bid evaluation easier to operate and saves manpower, material and financial resources, it also brings many problems, such as insufficient efforts in building a competitive environment, imperfect market competition mechanism, insufficient standardization of the use of reasonable lowest prices, uncertainty in cost control, and weak bidding team construction. Taking the bidding of university projects as an example, this paper analyzes in detail the specific problems and causes of the lowest bid, and puts forward corresponding preventive measures, including creating a good and orderly bidding environment, establishing a sound project library project management system, conducting preliminary research and demonstration of engineering projects, standardizing bidding organization work in accordance with the law, and strengthening bidding team construction. Through these measures, it is aimed to improve the fairness and effectiveness of bidding for university infrastructure projects, reduce risks, and ensure project quality.展开更多
文摘本文针对高校基建工程招投标过程中广泛采用的最低评标价法,进行了深入分析。尽管最低评标价法使得评标工作更加易于操作,节约了人力、物力和财力,但也带来了诸多问题,如竞争环境建设力度不够、市场竞争机制不完善、合理最低价使用不够规范、造价控制存在不确定性、以及招标队伍建设薄弱等。本文以高校工程招标为例,详细剖析了最低价中标存在的具体问题及其原因,并提出了相应的防范措施,包括营造良好有序的招投标环境、建立完善的项目库立项管理制度、开展工程项目前期调研论证、依法规范招标组织工作以及加强招标队伍建设等。通过这些措施,旨在提高高校基建工程招投标的公平性和有效性,降低风险,保障工程质量。This paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the lowest bid evaluation method widely used in the bidding process of university infrastructure projects. Although the lowest bid evaluation method makes the bid evaluation easier to operate and saves manpower, material and financial resources, it also brings many problems, such as insufficient efforts in building a competitive environment, imperfect market competition mechanism, insufficient standardization of the use of reasonable lowest prices, uncertainty in cost control, and weak bidding team construction. Taking the bidding of university projects as an example, this paper analyzes in detail the specific problems and causes of the lowest bid, and puts forward corresponding preventive measures, including creating a good and orderly bidding environment, establishing a sound project library project management system, conducting preliminary research and demonstration of engineering projects, standardizing bidding organization work in accordance with the law, and strengthening bidding team construction. Through these measures, it is aimed to improve the fairness and effectiveness of bidding for university infrastructure projects, reduce risks, and ensure project quality.