中西医结合治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折临床观察

目的探索中西医结合治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折新途径和新方法。方法对入选的42例患者,采用静脉输液,肌肉注射,口服药物,配合手法牵引和功能锻炼。结果 42例中,优6例,良29例,中5例,差2例,优良率达83.3%。结论中西医结合疗法能够更好的治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折,缩短患者卧床时间,改善生活质量,提高临床疗效。

中西医结合治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折36例疗效观察

目的:观察中西医结合治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效。方法:将36例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的42个椎体施以经皮穿刺椎体成形术(PVP),术后内服中药(处方:肉苁蓉、熟地黄、威灵仙、甘草、菟丝子、鹿角胶、山药、杜仲、当归、白芍、山茱萸、地龙)。观察近远期临床疗效。结果:术后所有患者疼痛症状均缓解,无明显手术并发症出现,X线摄片示伤椎高度无明显变化。术后2月复查,全部病例胸腰背部疼痛未复发,X线摄片示治疗椎体高度未见进一步丢失,椎体形态未有改变。结论:中西医结合治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折,能够迅速缓解疼痛,增加椎体的强度和脊柱的稳定性,且远期效果肯定,值得推广。

马相伯及其天主教本土化理论——从结合体到和合体的转变

马相伯是中国近代著名的教育家、宗教家、政治家。他自幼便受到中国传统文化和西方天主教文化的良好教育,这两种原本异质的文化结合在马相伯一人身上。这两种文化之间无疑是具有张力的,而马相伯的一生便是这种张力的充分映照。如何消除这种张力,如何从异质对立的结合体转变为相成相济的和合体,这也便是天主教如何本土化的问题。

中西医结合治疗急性期脑梗死32例临床研究

近年来，我们采用中西医结合方法治疗急性期脑梗死32例，并观察其对血清D-二聚体、纤维蛋白原（FIB）的影响，现报道如下。1临床资料1．1一般资料所有患者均为2009年1月～2010年12月于我院急诊住院及留察患者，共57例．随机分为2组。治疗组32例：男17例，女15例；

艾灸联合白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗儿童腺样体肥大的疗效

【目的】探讨艾灸联合白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗儿童腺样体肥大的疗效。【方法】本院收治的82例腺样体肥大患儿,随机分为两组,每组41例。观察组采用艾灸联合白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗,对照组采用白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗。比较两组患儿鼻塞消失时间、睡眠恢复时间、听力恢复时间、呼吸恢复时间,治疗前与治疗后3个月的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停-18量表(OSA-18)评分,临床疗效以及患者并发症发生情况。【结果】观察组患儿鼻塞消失时间、睡眠恢复时间、听力恢复时间、呼吸恢复时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);两组患儿在治疗3个月后OSA-18评分均降低(P<0.05),且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的总有效率为92.68%(38/41),高于对照组的73.17%(30/41),且两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】艾灸联合白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗儿童腺样体肥大有利于促进患者康复,改善患者的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停症状,提高患者的治疗效果,且不增加并发症发生率。

Evidence-based Clinical Chinese Medicine:What Has Changed Over the Past 20 Years

Chinese medicine has been used for centuries to treat a range of health conditions.This history has produced a wealth of classical literature,case studies and clinical research data detailing its use and effectiveness.However,high-quality and conclusive evidence that meets modern requirements for clinical decision support is lacking.This evidence gap limits the integration of Chinese medicine with contemporary medicine,which in turn limits global access and acceptance of Chinese medicine as a form of safe and effective health care.Over the past 20 years,researchers and organisations around the world,including the World Health Organization(WHO)and United Nations,have worked to support the integration of traditional medicines,such as Chinese medicine,with conventional medicines to improve global health care.This paper provides an overview of Chinese medicine studies published in the top four general medical journals(BMJ,JAMA,Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine)from February 2005 to February 2024 in the past 20 years to highlight the progress in the development of this evidence base.It also highlights key actions taken to promote evidence-based clinical Chinese medicine,including product and practitioner regulation,formalising education standards,and international collaborations.Research conducted at the China-Australia International Research Centre for Chinese Medicine demonstrates the benefits of such a collaboration.Through development of its unique and inclusive‘whole-evidence’approach,plus clinical studies and systematic reviews,the Centre has significantly contributed to the evidence base for clinical Chinese medicine.In addition,its high-impact papers and groundbreaking monographs have been cited in international conventional medicine guidelines.While progress has certainly been made during the past 20 years to build a stronger evidence base for clinical Chinese medicine,there is still a considerable gap that limits its integration with conventional medicine.Future funding and research are needed to continue this work and achieve to safe,effective and accessible traditional medicine as part of the WHO’s Universal Health Coverage strategy.

中西药联合治疗乳腺囊性增生症800例

目的:观察中西医结合治疗乳腺囊性增生症的疗效。方法:对2000例临床诊断为乳腺囊性增生症患者随机采用单纯西药组(A组)400例、单纯中药组(B组)800例、中西结合组(C组)800例3种不同方法治疗,观察其疗效;并且比较3种治疗方法的药物不良反应情况。结果:C组有效率7.75%、好转率12%、临床部分治愈率33.5%、完全治愈率46.75%、总有效率100%。3组比较,C组临床疗效显著优于A组和B组(P<0.005)而且药物不良反应极低。结论中西医结合治疗乳腺囊性增生症疗效好,药物不良反应极低,实用性强,具有临床研究和推广应用价值。

Ancient Respected and Modern Absorbed,Chinese Essence and Western Utility-Thoughts of the Integrated Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine

Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)and Western medicine are two medical systems formed in different cultural backgrounds.The differences between them are that TCM focuses on the study of the invisible state while Western medicine focuses more on the study of the visible state of the human body;TCM pays attention to systematicity and integrity,while Western medicine pays attention to local evidence;TCM attaches importance to dialectical thinking,while Western medicine attaches importance to materialistic thinking.For the development of TCM.it is necessary to take the initiative to learm from and absorb all the advanced scientific and technological achievements in the world today.To innovate TCM,it is necessary to need to adhere to(1)the integration of"research on TCM with the thought of TCM"and"research on TCM based on the thought of Western medicine";(2)the integration of scientization of TCM and scientization for TCM;(3)the integration of mobilization therapy and allopathic therapy;(4)the integration of treating patients and treating diseases;(5)the integration of preventive treatment and existent disease treatment;(6)the integration of individuality and commonality;and(7)the integration of the macro and the micro.