AIM： To review of the efficacy and safety outcomes of different single incision slings （SIS） systems, also in comparison with traditional slings.METHODS： A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE databas...AIM： To review of the efficacy and safety outcomes of different single incision slings （SIS） systems, also in comparison with traditional slings.METHODS： A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE database. The research was re-stricted to randomized and/or prospective trials and retrospective studies, published after 2006, with at least 20 patients with non-neurogenic stress urinary incontinence （SUI）. The studies had to assess effcacy and/or safety of the SIS with a minimum follow-up of 12 mo. All the paper assessing the performance of tension free vaginal tape secur were excluded from this review. The fnal selection included 19 papers fulflling the aforementioned criteria. Two authors independently reviewed the selected papers.RESULTS： Four different SIS systems were analysed： Ajust , Ophira , Altis and MiniArc . The average objective cure rate was 88%. Overall no statistically significant differences were found between SIS and traditional mid-urethral slings （MUS） in terms of objective cure （all P 〉 0.005）. Only one paper showed a statistically lower success rate in MiniArc？ vs Advant-age？ slings （40% vs 90%） and higher rates of failure in the SIS group. Since there was a great variability in terms of tests performed, it was not possible to com-pare subjective cure between studies. The vast part of the studies showed no major complications after SIS surgery. We also observed very low reported pain rates in SIS patients. The RCTs on Ajust？ and MiniArc？, showed better outcomes in terms of post-operative pain compared to MUS. None of the patients reported long- term pain complains. CONCLUSION： SIS showed similar effcacy to that of traditional slings but lower short-term pain, complication and failure rates.展开更多
Objective： Assess clinical efficacy and safety analysis of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgery and laparoscopic-alone surgery in treatment of endometrial cancer. Methods： select 76 cases of endometrial cancer pati...Objective： Assess clinical efficacy and safety analysis of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgery and laparoscopic-alone surgery in treatment of endometrial cancer. Methods： select 76 cases of endometrial cancer patients, divided into two groups, 40 in laparoscopic-alone group and 36 in laparoscopic-assisted group, and compare operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, lymph node number, anal exhaust time, indwelling catheter days and hospitalization days by group. Result： compared with laparoscopic-alone surgery, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgery has certain advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, anal exhaust time, indwelling catheter days and hospitalization days. Discussion： laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgery is a relatively safe, effective and good economic benefit surgical method in treatment of endometrial cancer.展开更多
文摘AIM： To review of the efficacy and safety outcomes of different single incision slings （SIS） systems, also in comparison with traditional slings.METHODS： A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE database. The research was re-stricted to randomized and/or prospective trials and retrospective studies, published after 2006, with at least 20 patients with non-neurogenic stress urinary incontinence （SUI）. The studies had to assess effcacy and/or safety of the SIS with a minimum follow-up of 12 mo. All the paper assessing the performance of tension free vaginal tape secur were excluded from this review. The fnal selection included 19 papers fulflling the aforementioned criteria. Two authors independently reviewed the selected papers.RESULTS： Four different SIS systems were analysed： Ajust , Ophira , Altis and MiniArc . The average objective cure rate was 88%. Overall no statistically significant differences were found between SIS and traditional mid-urethral slings （MUS） in terms of objective cure （all P 〉 0.005）. Only one paper showed a statistically lower success rate in MiniArc？ vs Advant-age？ slings （40% vs 90%） and higher rates of failure in the SIS group. Since there was a great variability in terms of tests performed, it was not possible to com-pare subjective cure between studies. The vast part of the studies showed no major complications after SIS surgery. We also observed very low reported pain rates in SIS patients. The RCTs on Ajust？ and MiniArc？, showed better outcomes in terms of post-operative pain compared to MUS. None of the patients reported long- term pain complains. CONCLUSION： SIS showed similar effcacy to that of traditional slings but lower short-term pain, complication and failure rates.
文摘Objective： Assess clinical efficacy and safety analysis of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgery and laparoscopic-alone surgery in treatment of endometrial cancer. Methods： select 76 cases of endometrial cancer patients, divided into two groups, 40 in laparoscopic-alone group and 36 in laparoscopic-assisted group, and compare operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, lymph node number, anal exhaust time, indwelling catheter days and hospitalization days by group. Result： compared with laparoscopic-alone surgery, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgery has certain advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, anal exhaust time, indwelling catheter days and hospitalization days. Discussion： laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgery is a relatively safe, effective and good economic benefit surgical method in treatment of endometrial cancer.
