主髂动脉分叉部覆膜支架重建(covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation,CERAB)技术是近些年逐渐推广使用的处理主髂动脉闭塞性病变的腔内治疗手段,与对吻支架技术相比,CERAB技术更加接近主髂动脉分叉处的解剖及...主髂动脉分叉部覆膜支架重建(covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation,CERAB)技术是近些年逐渐推广使用的处理主髂动脉闭塞性病变的腔内治疗手段,与对吻支架技术相比,CERAB技术更加接近主髂动脉分叉处的解剖及血流动力学特点,有利于降低对吻支架植入后血栓形成及内膜增生的发生率,提高远期通畅率。本文报道1例少见的双侧髂动脉闭塞性病变合并腹主动脉多发穿透性主动脉溃疡(penetrating aortic ulcer,PAU)患者的病历资料,在通过采用CERAB技术成功恢复双髂动脉血运的同时隔绝了腹主动脉多发PAU,改善了患者腹痛及下肢缺血的症状。展开更多
Objective To report the clinical outcome and complications ofendovascular stent-graft treatment for type B aortic dissection in elderly patients, as compared with younger patients in a single medical center. Methods F...Objective To report the clinical outcome and complications ofendovascular stent-graft treatment for type B aortic dissection in elderly patients, as compared with younger patients in a single medical center. Methods From May 2002 to July 2008, endovascular stent-graft implantation was performed in 124 patients with type B aortic dissection at the Department of Cardiology, Shenyang Northern Hospital. Among them, 39 patients were 60 yrs or older （ranging ~om 68 to 81 years） while 85 patients were younger than 60 years old （ranging from 31 to 58 years）. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 26 months （ranging from 1 to 78 months）. Clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Results Comparing with the younger group, the elderly group had higher prevalence of coronary artery disease （59.0% vs 24.7%, P=0.001）. There was no significant difference of complication rates between the 2 groups （38.5% vs 31.8%, P=0.54）. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a similar 5-year survival rate（80.2% vs 89.6%; Log Rank, P=0.31） between the 2 groups. Conclusions Endovascular stent-graft implantation is safe and effective in the treatment of type B aortic dissection for both elderly and younger patients. The procedure-related complication rate seems independent of age .展开更多
文摘主髂动脉分叉部覆膜支架重建(covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation,CERAB)技术是近些年逐渐推广使用的处理主髂动脉闭塞性病变的腔内治疗手段,与对吻支架技术相比,CERAB技术更加接近主髂动脉分叉处的解剖及血流动力学特点,有利于降低对吻支架植入后血栓形成及内膜增生的发生率,提高远期通畅率。本文报道1例少见的双侧髂动脉闭塞性病变合并腹主动脉多发穿透性主动脉溃疡(penetrating aortic ulcer,PAU)患者的病历资料,在通过采用CERAB技术成功恢复双髂动脉血运的同时隔绝了腹主动脉多发PAU,改善了患者腹痛及下肢缺血的症状。
文摘Objective To report the clinical outcome and complications ofendovascular stent-graft treatment for type B aortic dissection in elderly patients, as compared with younger patients in a single medical center. Methods From May 2002 to July 2008, endovascular stent-graft implantation was performed in 124 patients with type B aortic dissection at the Department of Cardiology, Shenyang Northern Hospital. Among them, 39 patients were 60 yrs or older （ranging ~om 68 to 81 years） while 85 patients were younger than 60 years old （ranging from 31 to 58 years）. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 26 months （ranging from 1 to 78 months）. Clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Results Comparing with the younger group, the elderly group had higher prevalence of coronary artery disease （59.0% vs 24.7%, P=0.001）. There was no significant difference of complication rates between the 2 groups （38.5% vs 31.8%, P=0.54）. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a similar 5-year survival rate（80.2% vs 89.6%; Log Rank, P=0.31） between the 2 groups. Conclusions Endovascular stent-graft implantation is safe and effective in the treatment of type B aortic dissection for both elderly and younger patients. The procedure-related complication rate seems independent of age .
