AIM:To evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic resection (HR) for solitary colorectal liver metastases (CLM).METHODS:A literature search was performed to identify com...AIM:To evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic resection (HR) for solitary colorectal liver metastases (CLM).METHODS:A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes for both RFA and HR for solitary CLM.Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model.RESULTS:Seven nonrandomized controlled trials studies were included in this analysis.These studies included a total of 847 patients:273 treated with RFA and 574 treated with HR.The 5 years overall survival rates in the HR group were significantly better than those in the RFA group (OR:0.41,95% CI:0.22-0.90,P=0.008).RFA had a higher rate of local intrahe-patic recurrence compared to HR (OR:4.89,95% CI:1.73-13.87,P=0.003).No differences were found between the two groups with respect to postoperative morbidity and mortality.CONCLUSION:HR was superior to RFA in the treatment of patients with solitary CLM.However,the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the lower level of evidence.展开更多
文摘AIM:To evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic resection (HR) for solitary colorectal liver metastases (CLM).METHODS:A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes for both RFA and HR for solitary CLM.Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model.RESULTS:Seven nonrandomized controlled trials studies were included in this analysis.These studies included a total of 847 patients:273 treated with RFA and 574 treated with HR.The 5 years overall survival rates in the HR group were significantly better than those in the RFA group (OR:0.41,95% CI:0.22-0.90,P=0.008).RFA had a higher rate of local intrahe-patic recurrence compared to HR (OR:4.89,95% CI:1.73-13.87,P=0.003).No differences were found between the two groups with respect to postoperative morbidity and mortality.CONCLUSION:HR was superior to RFA in the treatment of patients with solitary CLM.However,the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the lower level of evidence.
