目的:探讨全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)术后的早期步态特征及临床结果。方法:自2023年2月到2023年7月采用TKA治疗单侧膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)患者26例,男4例,女22例;年龄57~85(67.58±6.49)岁;身体质...目的:探讨全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)术后的早期步态特征及临床结果。方法:自2023年2月到2023年7月采用TKA治疗单侧膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)患者26例,男4例,女22例;年龄57~85(67.58±6.49)岁;身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)为18.83~38.28(26.43±4.15)kg·m^(-2);左膝14例,右膝12例;Kellgren-Lawrence分级,Ⅲ级6例,Ⅳ级20例;病程1~14(5.54±3.29)年。使用智能手机分别于术前、术后6周拍摄患者起立行走、行走侧拍、蹲起、仰卧屈膝的影像视频,通过人体姿势估计框架OpenPose分析步频、步长、步长时间、步速、膝关节主动屈膝角度、步幅、双下肢支撑相时间以及蹲姿中最大屈髋、屈膝角度。分别于术前及术后6周采用Western Ontario and McMaster大学骨关节炎指数(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteiarthritis Index,WOMAC)评分和美国膝关节协会(Knee Society score,KSS)进行临床疗效评价。结果:所有患者获得随访,时间5~7(6.00±0.57)周。WOMAC总分由术前的(64.85±11.54)分,减少至术后6周的(45.81±7.91)分(P<0.001);KSS由术前(101.19±9.58)分,提高至术后6周的(125.50±10.32)分(P<0.001)。患侧步速、步频、步幅分别由术前的(0.32±0.10)m·s^(-1)、(96.35±24.18)步·分^(-1)、(0.72±0.14)m,提高至术后的6周的(0.48±0.11)m·s^(-1)、(104.20±22.53)步·分^(-1)、(0.79±0.10)m(P<0.05)。双下肢支撑时间和主动屈膝角度由术前的(0.31±0.38)s、(125.21±11.64)°,减少至术后6周的(0.11±0.04)s、(120.01±13.35)°(P<0.05)。术前可以完成蹲起动作的11例,术后6周可以完成的13例,术前和术后6周同时可以完成的9例。9例蹲姿最大屈膝角度由术前的76.29°~124.11°提高至术后6周的91.35°~134.12°,最大屈髋角度由术前的103.70°~147.25°提高至术后6周的118.61°~149.48°。结论:基于人工智能影像识别步态分析技术是一种安全、有效的方法可以定量识别出患者步态的变化。KOA患者在行TKA后膝关节疼痛缓解,功能得以改善,TKA术后患肢的支撑能力有所改善,患者的步频、步幅、步速得到了提升,双下肢整体运动节律更为协调。展开更多
目的:观察超声引导下股神经阻滞联合复元活血汤对全膝关节置换术后患者疼痛程度及膝关节功能的影响。方法:选择2020年5月至2022年5月就诊于武汉市中医医院骨科收治的拟行全膝关节置换术的60例膝骨关节炎患者,按照随机数字表法分为试验...目的:观察超声引导下股神经阻滞联合复元活血汤对全膝关节置换术后患者疼痛程度及膝关节功能的影响。方法:选择2020年5月至2022年5月就诊于武汉市中医医院骨科收治的拟行全膝关节置换术的60例膝骨关节炎患者,按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,每组各30例。两组患者均给予人工全膝关节置换术,对照组于术后即刻行超声引导下股神经阻滞镇痛,试验组在对照组治疗的基础上口服复原活血汤。记录两组患者手术后第3天、第5天、第7天静息及被动屈曲20°、50°、70°时视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、患膝关节周缘肿胀差值、关节主动屈伸活动度、美国特种外科医院膝关节功能(hospital for special surgery,HSS)评分。结果:静息0°状态下,术后第3天试验组VAS评分高于对照组(P<0.05),但术后第5天、第7天两组患者VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。被动屈曲20°、45°、70°状态下,术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组VAS评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。在同一测量点,术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组患肢肿胀差值大对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组膝关节主动屈曲角度大于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组膝关节HSS评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:将超声引导下股神经阻滞联合复元活血汤运用于全膝关节置换术后,可降低术后各时间段的静息及主动屈伸时的疼痛程度,缓解患肢肿胀程度,从而增加患膝活动范围,促进膝关节功能恢复。展开更多
目的:观察快速康复外科(ERAS)理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施对机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者的临床应用及效果评价。方法:选取新疆医科大学第六附属医院2023年8月至2024年4月在腰硬联合麻醉下行单侧机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的患者75...目的:观察快速康复外科(ERAS)理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施对机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者的临床应用及效果评价。方法:选取新疆医科大学第六附属医院2023年8月至2024年4月在腰硬联合麻醉下行单侧机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的患者75例,分为对照组36例和观察组39例。对照组采用常规围手术期护理干预措施,观察组采用ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施。比较两组围手术期指标(术后首次下床活动时间、尿管拔除时间)、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分、美国膝关节协会(KSS)评分、膝关节主动活动度(ROM)、护理满意度及住院时间。结果:与对照组相比,采取ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施后,观察组术后首次下床活动时间为(23.06 ± 1.17)小时,尿管拔除时间为(6.82 ± 0.76)小时,均短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P Objective: To observe the clinical application and effect evaluation of perioperative nursing interventions guided by the concept of rapid recovery surgery (ERAS) on patients undergoing robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A total of 75 patients undergoing unilateral robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia from August 2023 to April 2024 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were enrolled, and they were divided into control group (36 cases) and observation group (39 cases). The control group was treated with conventional perioperative nursing interventions, and the observation group was guided by ERAS concept. The perioperative indexes (time to first get out of bed after surgery, time to urethral catheter removal), postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, American Knee Association (KSS) score, knee active range of motion (ROM), nursing satisfaction and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the control group, the time of first postoperative activity and the time of urethral catheter removal in the observation group were (23.06 ± 1.17) hours, and the time of urethral catheter removal was (6.82 ± 0.76) hours, which were shorter than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the VAS score of the observation group was (4.46 ± 0.79) on the first day after operation, and (2.21 ± 0.66) on the seventh day after operation. The HSS score was (59.31 ± 2.36) on the seventh day and (81.38 ± 2.16) on the first month after operation. The KSS score in the first month after surgery was (78.38 ± 2.20). The ROM in the first month after surgery was (110.00±2.56);The nursing satisfaction score at discharge was (95.79 ± 0.81). The average length of hospital stay was (11.15 ± 1.25) days, which was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative nursing measures under the guidance of ERAS concept have good clinical application value in accelerating the knee rehabilitation process of patients undergoing robotic total knee arthroplasty.展开更多
文摘目的:探讨全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)术后的早期步态特征及临床结果。方法:自2023年2月到2023年7月采用TKA治疗单侧膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)患者26例,男4例,女22例;年龄57~85(67.58±6.49)岁;身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)为18.83~38.28(26.43±4.15)kg·m^(-2);左膝14例,右膝12例;Kellgren-Lawrence分级,Ⅲ级6例,Ⅳ级20例;病程1~14(5.54±3.29)年。使用智能手机分别于术前、术后6周拍摄患者起立行走、行走侧拍、蹲起、仰卧屈膝的影像视频,通过人体姿势估计框架OpenPose分析步频、步长、步长时间、步速、膝关节主动屈膝角度、步幅、双下肢支撑相时间以及蹲姿中最大屈髋、屈膝角度。分别于术前及术后6周采用Western Ontario and McMaster大学骨关节炎指数(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteiarthritis Index,WOMAC)评分和美国膝关节协会(Knee Society score,KSS)进行临床疗效评价。结果:所有患者获得随访,时间5~7(6.00±0.57)周。WOMAC总分由术前的(64.85±11.54)分,减少至术后6周的(45.81±7.91)分(P<0.001);KSS由术前(101.19±9.58)分,提高至术后6周的(125.50±10.32)分(P<0.001)。患侧步速、步频、步幅分别由术前的(0.32±0.10)m·s^(-1)、(96.35±24.18)步·分^(-1)、(0.72±0.14)m,提高至术后的6周的(0.48±0.11)m·s^(-1)、(104.20±22.53)步·分^(-1)、(0.79±0.10)m(P<0.05)。双下肢支撑时间和主动屈膝角度由术前的(0.31±0.38)s、(125.21±11.64)°,减少至术后6周的(0.11±0.04)s、(120.01±13.35)°(P<0.05)。术前可以完成蹲起动作的11例,术后6周可以完成的13例,术前和术后6周同时可以完成的9例。9例蹲姿最大屈膝角度由术前的76.29°~124.11°提高至术后6周的91.35°~134.12°,最大屈髋角度由术前的103.70°~147.25°提高至术后6周的118.61°~149.48°。结论:基于人工智能影像识别步态分析技术是一种安全、有效的方法可以定量识别出患者步态的变化。KOA患者在行TKA后膝关节疼痛缓解,功能得以改善,TKA术后患肢的支撑能力有所改善,患者的步频、步幅、步速得到了提升,双下肢整体运动节律更为协调。
文摘目的:观察超声引导下股神经阻滞联合复元活血汤对全膝关节置换术后患者疼痛程度及膝关节功能的影响。方法:选择2020年5月至2022年5月就诊于武汉市中医医院骨科收治的拟行全膝关节置换术的60例膝骨关节炎患者,按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,每组各30例。两组患者均给予人工全膝关节置换术,对照组于术后即刻行超声引导下股神经阻滞镇痛,试验组在对照组治疗的基础上口服复原活血汤。记录两组患者手术后第3天、第5天、第7天静息及被动屈曲20°、50°、70°时视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、患膝关节周缘肿胀差值、关节主动屈伸活动度、美国特种外科医院膝关节功能(hospital for special surgery,HSS)评分。结果:静息0°状态下,术后第3天试验组VAS评分高于对照组(P<0.05),但术后第5天、第7天两组患者VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。被动屈曲20°、45°、70°状态下,术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组VAS评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。在同一测量点,术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组患肢肿胀差值大对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组膝关节主动屈曲角度大于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天、第5天、第7天试验组膝关节HSS评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:将超声引导下股神经阻滞联合复元活血汤运用于全膝关节置换术后,可降低术后各时间段的静息及主动屈伸时的疼痛程度,缓解患肢肿胀程度,从而增加患膝活动范围,促进膝关节功能恢复。
文摘目的:观察快速康复外科(ERAS)理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施对机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者的临床应用及效果评价。方法:选取新疆医科大学第六附属医院2023年8月至2024年4月在腰硬联合麻醉下行单侧机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的患者75例,分为对照组36例和观察组39例。对照组采用常规围手术期护理干预措施,观察组采用ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施。比较两组围手术期指标(术后首次下床活动时间、尿管拔除时间)、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分、美国膝关节协会(KSS)评分、膝关节主动活动度(ROM)、护理满意度及住院时间。结果:与对照组相比,采取ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施后,观察组术后首次下床活动时间为(23.06 ± 1.17)小时,尿管拔除时间为(6.82 ± 0.76)小时,均短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P Objective: To observe the clinical application and effect evaluation of perioperative nursing interventions guided by the concept of rapid recovery surgery (ERAS) on patients undergoing robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A total of 75 patients undergoing unilateral robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia from August 2023 to April 2024 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were enrolled, and they were divided into control group (36 cases) and observation group (39 cases). The control group was treated with conventional perioperative nursing interventions, and the observation group was guided by ERAS concept. The perioperative indexes (time to first get out of bed after surgery, time to urethral catheter removal), postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, American Knee Association (KSS) score, knee active range of motion (ROM), nursing satisfaction and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the control group, the time of first postoperative activity and the time of urethral catheter removal in the observation group were (23.06 ± 1.17) hours, and the time of urethral catheter removal was (6.82 ± 0.76) hours, which were shorter than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the VAS score of the observation group was (4.46 ± 0.79) on the first day after operation, and (2.21 ± 0.66) on the seventh day after operation. The HSS score was (59.31 ± 2.36) on the seventh day and (81.38 ± 2.16) on the first month after operation. The KSS score in the first month after surgery was (78.38 ± 2.20). The ROM in the first month after surgery was (110.00±2.56);The nursing satisfaction score at discharge was (95.79 ± 0.81). The average length of hospital stay was (11.15 ± 1.25) days, which was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative nursing measures under the guidance of ERAS concept have good clinical application value in accelerating the knee rehabilitation process of patients undergoing robotic total knee arthroplasty.
