分析家庭预防护理及保健在小儿哮喘护理中的应用效果。方法:选取 62 例我院收治的哮喘患儿,随机分为观察组与对照组,均 31 例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组则给予家庭预防护理及保健干预。结果:观察组患儿家长的健康知识掌握率、患儿复诊...分析家庭预防护理及保健在小儿哮喘护理中的应用效果。方法:选取 62 例我院收治的哮喘患儿,随机分为观察组与对照组,均 31 例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组则给予家庭预防护理及保健干预。结果:观察组患儿家长的健康知识掌握率、患儿复诊率,均显著高于对照组;且其患儿的再住院率,显著低于对照组;P<0.05。观察组患儿的治疗依从性,显著高于对照组的,P<0.05。结论:家庭预防护理及保健干预可提升患儿家长的健康知识掌握率,从而提高患儿治疗依从性,降低其再住院率,显著提高患儿的生活质量。Abstract:Objective: To analyze the application effect of family preventive care and health care in the care of children with asthma. Methods: A total of 62 children with asthma admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 31 cases in each group. The control group was given routine care, and the observation group was given home preventive care and health care intervention. Results: The rate of mastering health knowledge and the rate of follow-up visits of the parents of children in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group; and the rehospitalization rate of the children in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group; P<0.05. The treatment compliance of children in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, P<0.05. Conclusion: Family preventive care and health care intervention can improve the health knowledge mastery rate of the parents of children, thereby improving the compliance of the children to treatment, reducing the rate of rehospitalization, and significantly improving the quality of life of the children.展开更多
文摘分析家庭预防护理及保健在小儿哮喘护理中的应用效果。方法:选取 62 例我院收治的哮喘患儿,随机分为观察组与对照组,均 31 例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组则给予家庭预防护理及保健干预。结果:观察组患儿家长的健康知识掌握率、患儿复诊率,均显著高于对照组;且其患儿的再住院率,显著低于对照组;P<0.05。观察组患儿的治疗依从性,显著高于对照组的,P<0.05。结论:家庭预防护理及保健干预可提升患儿家长的健康知识掌握率,从而提高患儿治疗依从性,降低其再住院率,显著提高患儿的生活质量。Abstract:Objective: To analyze the application effect of family preventive care and health care in the care of children with asthma. Methods: A total of 62 children with asthma admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 31 cases in each group. The control group was given routine care, and the observation group was given home preventive care and health care intervention. Results: The rate of mastering health knowledge and the rate of follow-up visits of the parents of children in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group; and the rehospitalization rate of the children in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group; P<0.05. The treatment compliance of children in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, P<0.05. Conclusion: Family preventive care and health care intervention can improve the health knowledge mastery rate of the parents of children, thereby improving the compliance of the children to treatment, reducing the rate of rehospitalization, and significantly improving the quality of life of the children.