数字时代的协同共生框架:系统效率与价值进化

秉持“协同共生理念”,在借鉴经典企业成长理论的3个流派“内部资源成长理论”流派、“网络化成长理论”流派、“合法化成长理论”流派,以及“竞争价值框架”的基础上,提出数字化时代企业成长的协同共生框架。即协同共生框架通过赋能和管控、内部和外部两个维度构建,并分别呈现出4个象限:共生系统象限、人力资源象限、制度流程象限、链接模式象限。

自然价值的进化

人类面临生态困境 ,这与人类价值观密切相关。自然价值的问题是 2 1世纪人们高度关切的根本性问题。为了认识自然价值问题 ,有必要了解自然价值是怎样产生和发展的。自然价值是自然物质生产过程的创造。自然物质生产是历史地发展的 ,自然价值的创造也是历史地发展的。这种历史发展促成自然价值的进化。总的说来 ,它朝着价值不断增殖的方向运动。

试论技术价值的进化

技术价值的进化是在技术系统的发展和技术活动的过程中进行的,是一个不断认识技术价值、评价和选择技术价值、创造和生产技术价值、转移和实现技术价值的复杂过程,总的过程遵循技竞人择、倍积效应和生态约束三大规律。技术价值进化到今天表现出三个特点,即在整体上突出生态价值,在方向上转向人文价值,在目标上追求多样价值。

未来可持续供应链的内涵、发展逻辑及策略研究

政治风云动荡、经济增长乏力、资源消耗量大、环境治理压力大等诸多困境的影响,使可持续发展成为值得研究的重要课题。文章剖析了可持续供应链的内涵,概括了可持续供应链的六大基本特征:低碳、低能耗、少污染、高社会责任、高透明度和可追溯性。采用扎根理论和多案例研究方法,并按照理念萌芽、理念践行和理念再传播三个阶段归纳总结了可持续供应链发展逻辑与价值演化逻辑。从主体、技术、设施和环境四个角度提出未来供应链可持续发展的多主体协同策略、供应链数字化转型策略、韧性供应链体系策略以及政府营造的可持续发展环境策略,以期为新形势下供应链可持续发展提供借鉴。

On Scientific-Technological Ethics

Ethics and morality are old and constantly updated topic. In the modern science and technology rapid development situation, study of ethics of science and technology is relatively backward. The times call for advanced and reasonable ethics of science-technology. Basic concepts and characteristics of ethics and morals are distinguished and defined in this paper. Three ethic essences of science-technology are abstracted from scientific-technological generation, application, and development. The three-dimension system of basic principles for scientific-technologic ethics is created, as illustrated by the portions given in this paper. The evolution formula of value system is derived, and used for appraising whether the science-technology activity is in all reason. Furthermore, it provides the theory base for quantified management. Finally, it is pointed out that morality and law should be supplemented each other in the science-technology management.

Global Bioethical Prevention of the Collision of Biological and Cultural Evolution on Miserable Human Survival

With the cultural myth that science can only determine the way the world ＂is＂ （facts）, while humanities, social sciences, lawyers, philosophers, and theologians must determine the way the world ＂ought to be＂ （values）, those in position of global-, national-, and local-political power make major decisions of the use （or non-use） of scientific knowledge and technology. As a result, the human being has created a non-scientifically based cultural environment that is affecting his ability to survive. In effect, cultural evolution is occurring more rapidly than biological evolution that can adapt to the changes brought about in the physical and psycho-social environments. In a pluralistic cultural world, where each society has generated a different view of human nature and different ethical values, the use, misuse, or non-use of scientific and technological advances are derived from these unscientific views of human nature. Since all life depends on limiting interacting environmental and ecological factors, it is imperative that scientific information be used to govern how to minimize irreversible effects on life-sustaining ecological factors, but also scientific information bearing on understanding human nature ought to be integrated into a ＂global bioethics＂. While ethical values cannot be directly derived from scientific factors, it is also true that human values or our ＂ought＂ cannot be maintained in ignorance or defiance of the facts or the ＂is＂.

社会整合性的精神

社会精神是由物质实践和社会关系之间相互作用所整合成的社会总功能,它标志着人类超越被动物质而具备的主体能动性。社会精神一旦建立就上升成为相对独立的,以整体中心为原则的社会作用核心。这是人类智慧由以产生,社会能动机制由以形成的原因。以社会历史整合性精神的核心力量,反过来调控社会以及主导人的活动,指挥物质实践与社会关系之间的相互作用,选取有效性价值进行优化存续,促成人的精神进化,从而使人类不断趋向自由自觉。