This study defines and compares four scenarios for MSW （municipal solid waste） management： Scenario 1, unsorted waste taken to a landfill （baseline scenario）; Scenario 2, sorted waste used for home or communal co...This study defines and compares four scenarios for MSW （municipal solid waste） management： Scenario 1, unsorted waste taken to a landfill （baseline scenario）; Scenario 2, sorted waste used for home or communal composting; Scenario 3, sorted waste used for anaerobic digestion; and Scenario 4, sorted waste taken to a composting centre. The results of this study suggest that Scenario 1 would emit the highest levels of GHG （greenhouse gas） emissions, 692 x 103 tonnes CO2eq per year. Scenario 3 would have the lowest levels of GHG emissions, 195 x 103 tonnes CO2eq per year. Compared with the baseline scenario, it yields a 72% reduction of GHG emissions with a total savings of 498 ~ 103 tonnes CO2eq per year. The second-best option is Scenario 2, followed closely by Scenario 4, both yield 66.6% reductions with deviation by 0.03%. The deviation is due to transportation, which emission is negligibly small. The amounts of GHG savings for Scenario 2 and 4 are 461.3 ×10^3 tonnes CO2eq per year and 461×10^3 tonnes CO2eq per year, respectively It is evident from these results that anaerobic digestion has the highest potential for reducing GHG emissions.展开更多
文摘This study defines and compares four scenarios for MSW （municipal solid waste） management： Scenario 1, unsorted waste taken to a landfill （baseline scenario）; Scenario 2, sorted waste used for home or communal composting; Scenario 3, sorted waste used for anaerobic digestion; and Scenario 4, sorted waste taken to a composting centre. The results of this study suggest that Scenario 1 would emit the highest levels of GHG （greenhouse gas） emissions, 692 x 103 tonnes CO2eq per year. Scenario 3 would have the lowest levels of GHG emissions, 195 x 103 tonnes CO2eq per year. Compared with the baseline scenario, it yields a 72% reduction of GHG emissions with a total savings of 498 ~ 103 tonnes CO2eq per year. The second-best option is Scenario 2, followed closely by Scenario 4, both yield 66.6% reductions with deviation by 0.03%. The deviation is due to transportation, which emission is negligibly small. The amounts of GHG savings for Scenario 2 and 4 are 461.3 ×10^3 tonnes CO2eq per year and 461×10^3 tonnes CO2eq per year, respectively It is evident from these results that anaerobic digestion has the highest potential for reducing GHG emissions.
