【目的】分析第三方网站“发表记”中作者对学术期刊的投稿评论,揭示作者对期刊的投稿认知和情感感知,为期刊改进工作效能提供参考。【方法】利用八爪鱼爬虫软件爬取作者评论数据,使用文本分析法并借助ROST CM 6.0软件进行分词和词频分...【目的】分析第三方网站“发表记”中作者对学术期刊的投稿评论,揭示作者对期刊的投稿认知和情感感知,为期刊改进工作效能提供参考。【方法】利用八爪鱼爬虫软件爬取作者评论数据,使用文本分析法并借助ROST CM 6.0软件进行分词和词频分析,构建语义网络并进行情感分析。【结果】大部分学术期刊并无投稿评论,大部分有评论的期刊是核心期刊,且社科期刊数量较多。作者关注的高频词包括投稿结果、审稿过程、稿件处理周期、与编辑部沟通、费用问题、选题偏好、学历职称偏好等。作者评论数据的语义网络呈现出“核心-边缘”的层级结构。作者评论内容以正向情感为主,中性情感居第二位,负向情感最少。【结论】期刊的审稿速度、出版时效、沟通态度、收费标准是最显著的投稿认知与作者评论的影响因素。期刊应当重视作者的投稿感受,建构良好的投稿形象,吸引并留住优秀作者群体;完善现有期刊管理体制,充分发挥学术共同体的作用;重视同行评议,保证期刊审稿质量;建立健全与作者的沟通机制,及时反馈审阅意见。展开更多
The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that the processual aspect of literary works of art deserves much more attention than it normally receives by readers, critics, and theorists. The most important reason fo...The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that the processual aspect of literary works of art deserves much more attention than it normally receives by readers, critics, and theorists. The most important reason for this is seen in the fact that texts since the advent of print culture have been disseminated and passed on in written form and that in the medium of writing the processual character of language is only insufficiently taken care of by a cultural convention of arranging and approaching the presented signs in an particular sequence. Whereas in an oral culture the dynamic processuality of a speech or recitation was directly experienced by the listeners, the spatial arrangement of signs in writing enables and even entices readers and critics to read this or that part of a written text in a sequence of their own making. What remains out of focus is that in doing so they miss the particular semantic profile and aesthetic character of the work as created by the author--a procedure particularly hurtful in the case of literary works of art. There is hope, however, that this will somewhat change by our moving towards a performance culture展开更多
文摘【目的】分析第三方网站“发表记”中作者对学术期刊的投稿评论,揭示作者对期刊的投稿认知和情感感知,为期刊改进工作效能提供参考。【方法】利用八爪鱼爬虫软件爬取作者评论数据,使用文本分析法并借助ROST CM 6.0软件进行分词和词频分析,构建语义网络并进行情感分析。【结果】大部分学术期刊并无投稿评论,大部分有评论的期刊是核心期刊,且社科期刊数量较多。作者关注的高频词包括投稿结果、审稿过程、稿件处理周期、与编辑部沟通、费用问题、选题偏好、学历职称偏好等。作者评论数据的语义网络呈现出“核心-边缘”的层级结构。作者评论内容以正向情感为主,中性情感居第二位,负向情感最少。【结论】期刊的审稿速度、出版时效、沟通态度、收费标准是最显著的投稿认知与作者评论的影响因素。期刊应当重视作者的投稿感受,建构良好的投稿形象,吸引并留住优秀作者群体;完善现有期刊管理体制,充分发挥学术共同体的作用;重视同行评议,保证期刊审稿质量;建立健全与作者的沟通机制,及时反馈审阅意见。
文摘The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that the processual aspect of literary works of art deserves much more attention than it normally receives by readers, critics, and theorists. The most important reason for this is seen in the fact that texts since the advent of print culture have been disseminated and passed on in written form and that in the medium of writing the processual character of language is only insufficiently taken care of by a cultural convention of arranging and approaching the presented signs in an particular sequence. Whereas in an oral culture the dynamic processuality of a speech or recitation was directly experienced by the listeners, the spatial arrangement of signs in writing enables and even entices readers and critics to read this or that part of a written text in a sequence of their own making. What remains out of focus is that in doing so they miss the particular semantic profile and aesthetic character of the work as created by the author--a procedure particularly hurtful in the case of literary works of art. There is hope, however, that this will somewhat change by our moving towards a performance culture
