期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
考虑风险的Shapley值供应链利润分配策略 被引量:4
1
作者 张华 高作峰 《商业研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期55-56,共2页
供应链利润分配是否合理直接影响到运作效率和持久性,在Shapley值分配模型的基础上考虑供应链合作风险,根据给出的风险因子改进Shapley值,并把考虑合作风险的Shapley值算法运用到供应链利润分配问题中去。这一分配方案是对原有Shapley... 供应链利润分配是否合理直接影响到运作效率和持久性,在Shapley值分配模型的基础上考虑供应链合作风险,根据给出的风险因子改进Shapley值,并把考虑合作风险的Shapley值算法运用到供应链利润分配问题中去。这一分配方案是对原有Shapley值分配模型的推广,可以作为企业是否参加供应链合作的一个指标。 展开更多
关键词 供应风险管理 SHAPLEY值 供应链利润分配
下载PDF
力量不对等供应链中的零售商-制造商广告-研发博弈 被引量:2
2
作者 夏良杰 赵道致 李友东 《西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第3期87-97,共11页
论文分析了零售商主导的供应链上下游企业间的研发与广告合作行为,并比较了零售商主导和制造商主导时供应链的广告、研发投资和总利润。博弈与模拟分析揭示:零售商主导供应链时,零售商在斯坦伯格博弈均衡时的利润高于纳什均衡时,制造商... 论文分析了零售商主导的供应链上下游企业间的研发与广告合作行为,并比较了零售商主导和制造商主导时供应链的广告、研发投资和总利润。博弈与模拟分析揭示:零售商主导供应链时,零售商在斯坦伯格博弈均衡时的利润高于纳什均衡时,制造商在哪种博弈均衡时取得的收益更大视参数具体值而定,纳什均衡时零售商不分担制造商的研发费用;零售商主导供应链时,制造商在集中决策时的研发投入最高,零售商在何种博弈均衡时最优广告投入最高与具体参数有关;在一定条件下,零售商主导的供应链总利润更高。不同情形下的斯坦伯格博弈、纳什博弈和集中决策分析表明,渠道主导力量同时影响着供应链成员和整体运营绩效。 展开更多
关键词 零售商主导供应 广告-研发关联博弈 供应链利润分配 不同主导力量的供应比较
下载PDF
The Operation Mechanism of Agricultural Products Supply Chain and Profit Allocation Model in the Context of Asymmetric Information 被引量:1
3
作者 齐天真 孙蕊 郭超坤 《Agricultural Science & Technology》 CAS 2016年第1期197-200,233,共5页
The research performed analysis on causes of asymmetric information of agricultural product supply chain and made conclusion on operation mechanism and characteristics of supply chain based on asymmetric information. ... The research performed analysis on causes of asymmetric information of agricultural product supply chain and made conclusion on operation mechanism and characteristics of supply chain based on asymmetric information. Finally, the research detailed profit sharing of agricultural product supply chain in the context of asymmetric information and proposed suggestions, providing references of pricing and profit sharing of supply chains of agricultural products. 展开更多
关键词 Information asymmetry The supply chain of agricultural products The operation mechanism Profit allocation model
下载PDF
The Mechanism Research of Green Supply Chain Synergy Profit Distribution Based on the Shapley Value Method
4
作者 CHU Liqin LI Bo 《International English Education Research》 2016年第12期15-17,共3页
Under green supply chain mode, how to Carry out the distribution of profits between subjects is an important problem. Through the comparison of the green supply chain benefit allocation of non-cooperative game and coo... Under green supply chain mode, how to Carry out the distribution of profits between subjects is an important problem. Through the comparison of the green supply chain benefit allocation of non-cooperative game and cooperative game the payoffmatrix, it is clearly that the necessity of interest distribution cooperative game. Put general manufacturing enterprises of green supply chain as the research object, using Shapley value method for theory analysis and example verification, vertifys that enterprise synergy gains more than their own separate management, and puts forward a feasible path of supply chain collaboration through the construction of the distribution of interests coordination model. 展开更多
关键词 Green supply chain Profit distribution synergy Shapley value mode
下载PDF
Fairness of Extra-Gain Guilty in Performance of Supply Chain and Contract Design
5
作者 LI Jianbin FAN Xiaoshuai DAI Bin 《Journal of Systems Science & Complexity》 SCIE EI CSCD 2017年第4期866-882,共17页
Considering a one-supplier and two-retailer supply chain setting in which the supplier makes contacts with retailers in sequence based on FCFS(first–come–first-service) principle, the authors investigate the margina... Considering a one-supplier and two-retailer supply chain setting in which the supplier makes contacts with retailers in sequence based on FCFS(first–come–first-service) principle, the authors investigate the marginal effect of extra-gain guilty fairness concerns of supply chain members on the contract design, supply chain's profit and profit distribution. When the supplier considers distributional fairness of loss aversion and extra-gain guilty, extra-gain guilty concern reduces the optimal wholesale and retail price, and improves supply chain performance. When the first or the second retailer considers distributional fairness and peer-induced fairness, extra-gain guilty concerns decrease the optimal wholesale and retail price but increase the profit of all supply chain members only when the level of loss aversion is large enough and the level of extra-gain guilty is less than 1/2. However, when the level of loss aversion is small and the level of extra-gain guilty is less than 1/2, extra-gain guilty has no influence on supply chain performance. The analysis reveals that the supply chain performance can be further improved by considering fairness of extra-gain guilty. 展开更多
关键词 Behavioral operations management extra-gain guilty FAIRNESS supply chain coordination.
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部