侦查违法行为的性质及其制约措施

侦查违法行为与侦查合法行为相对,属于广义上的侦查行为,是指侦查主体违反侦查程序,侵犯犯罪嫌疑人权利的非法侦查行为。侦查违法行为的性质具有双重属性,一种是司法程序违法性质,一种是行政侵权性质。根据其性质,应从司法制约、制裁和行政诉讼、行政制裁两种思路去规制侦查违法行为。

《关于侦查监督部门调查核实侦查违法行为的意见(试行)》理解与适用

2013年底,最高人民检察院侦查监督厅制定下发了《关于侦查监督部门调查核实侦查违法行为的意见(试行)》(以下简称《意见》),对调查核实的范围、原则、方式、期限、调查后的处理等都作了规定,既为各级检察机关侦查监督部门开展调查核实工作提供了依据,又对开展调查核实工作进行了规范.为了便于各级检察机关侦查监督部门正确理解和适用这一规定,现将有关问题说明如下.

论构建我国侦查程序构造的“诉讼”形态——以“权力制约权力、权利制约权力”为基础

侦查程序是我国刑事审判前程序的初始程序,在司法实践中,侦查阶段的程序性违法行为屡禁不止,考察其原因,主要是缺乏来自外部中立的司法权对侦查权的制约以及犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼权利对侦查权的制约,可以说,在目前我国的侦查程序构造中还不具有一种"诉讼"的特征。我国应该在考虑国情的基础上借鉴西方国家的先进经验,来完善我国的侦查程序构造。

A Conceptual Inquisition on Sexual Crimes

In this paper, the starting point comprises the general philosophy of sexuality. Despite certain differences in various cultures throughout the world and social history regarding all matters of sexuality, many converging principles of mankind are also there to take notice. In this light, in this work, the dimension of criminality in sexuality is taken into consideration. Rape seems to be the most common type of violent sexual crime. The topic of sexual offences （milder crimes） in the legal framework is further developed and debated, with references to figures of authority. Sexual harassment seems to be the mildest form or degree of offence on a scale depicting the spectrum of sexual crimes. As a matter of fact, its mere definition emerged only in contemporary times, even though its presence had been a fact of social life, throughout the ages. In this paper, while a general survey is preferred, peculiarities due to Turkey as a separate country with its own cultural history, are also alluded to inappropriate places, along the course of debates.

侦查监督视域中的调查核实权研究——以J省T市人民检察院2016—2019年刑事检察实践为例

调查核实作为检察机关履行法律监督职能的重要手段,在刑事检察实践中运行效果亟待改进。以J省T市人民检察院2016—2019年刑事检察实践为例,检察机关及其办案人员对此项检察职权的使用存在诸多问题。检察机关对违反法定程序的侦查行为进行调查核实时,其程序的启动较为随意,调查核实权与退回补充侦查手段出现混同,调查核实处理结果违反比例原则,因而公安机关对调查核实结果的认可率不高。这些问题既源于独立调查核实程序的缺失,也凸显出调查核实权刚性不足。对此,检察机关要转变调查核实理念,构建规范的调查核实程序,这不仅关系到调查核实权的顺畅运行,亦关涉侦查监督的质效。