为了解决传统随钻侧向电阻率测井在油基钻井液下测量受限的问题,提出基于电容耦合非接触电导测量(C^4D)技术的信号检测方法与装置。首先构建基于C^4D技术的测井等效电路模型,然后采用数字相敏解调技术实现测井微弱信号幅值和相位的检测...为了解决传统随钻侧向电阻率测井在油基钻井液下测量受限的问题,提出基于电容耦合非接触电导测量(C^4D)技术的信号检测方法与装置。首先构建基于C^4D技术的测井等效电路模型,然后采用数字相敏解调技术实现测井微弱信号幅值和相位的检测,依据所建模型可求得地层电阻率;同时,采用有限元仿真方法对模型的有效性以及所设计的测井响应特性进行研究;最后,设计1套模拟测井实验装置,并在多个激励频率下进行实验。研究结果表明:在20 k Hz工况下实验装置的测量性能较好;当等效地层电阻率为0.135~8.368 kΩ·m时,测量相对误差小于5%。展开更多
There exist different response characteristics in the resistivity measurements of dual laterolog （DLL） and logging while drilling （LWD） electromagnetic wave propagation logging in highly deviated and horizontal we...There exist different response characteristics in the resistivity measurements of dual laterolog （DLL） and logging while drilling （LWD） electromagnetic wave propagation logging in highly deviated and horizontal wells due to the difference in their measuring principles. In this study, we first use the integral equation method simulated the response characteristics of LWD resistivity and use the three dimensional finite element method （3D-FEM） simulated the response characteristics of DLL resistivity in horizontal wells, and then analyzed the response differences between the DLL and LWD resistivity. The comparative analysis indicated that the response differences may be caused by different factors such as differences in the angle of instrument inclination, anisotropy, formation interface, and mud intrusion. In the interface, the curves of the LWD resistivity become sharp with increases in the deviation while those of the DLL resistivity gradually become smooth. Both curves are affected by the anisotropy although the effect on DLL resistivity is lower than the LWD resistivity. These differences aid in providing a reasonable explanation in the horizontal well. However, this can also simultaneously lead to false results. At the end of the study, we explain the effects of the differences in the interpretation of the horizontal well based on the results and actual data analysis.展开更多
文摘为了解决传统随钻侧向电阻率测井在油基钻井液下测量受限的问题,提出基于电容耦合非接触电导测量(C^4D)技术的信号检测方法与装置。首先构建基于C^4D技术的测井等效电路模型,然后采用数字相敏解调技术实现测井微弱信号幅值和相位的检测,依据所建模型可求得地层电阻率;同时,采用有限元仿真方法对模型的有效性以及所设计的测井响应特性进行研究;最后,设计1套模拟测井实验装置,并在多个激励频率下进行实验。研究结果表明:在20 k Hz工况下实验装置的测量性能较好;当等效地层电阻率为0.135~8.368 kΩ·m时,测量相对误差小于5%。
基金supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China(Nos.2016ZX05014-002-001,2016ZX05002-005-001,and 2017ZX05005-005-005)
文摘There exist different response characteristics in the resistivity measurements of dual laterolog （DLL） and logging while drilling （LWD） electromagnetic wave propagation logging in highly deviated and horizontal wells due to the difference in their measuring principles. In this study, we first use the integral equation method simulated the response characteristics of LWD resistivity and use the three dimensional finite element method （3D-FEM） simulated the response characteristics of DLL resistivity in horizontal wells, and then analyzed the response differences between the DLL and LWD resistivity. The comparative analysis indicated that the response differences may be caused by different factors such as differences in the angle of instrument inclination, anisotropy, formation interface, and mud intrusion. In the interface, the curves of the LWD resistivity become sharp with increases in the deviation while those of the DLL resistivity gradually become smooth. Both curves are affected by the anisotropy although the effect on DLL resistivity is lower than the LWD resistivity. These differences aid in providing a reasonable explanation in the horizontal well. However, this can also simultaneously lead to false results. At the end of the study, we explain the effects of the differences in the interpretation of the horizontal well based on the results and actual data analysis.
