目的:观察健康志愿者不同功率递增速率完成症状限制性极限心肺运动试验(CPET)对CPET峰值运动相关核心指标的影响,及运动中呼吸交换率(RER)的变化。以探讨不同功率递增速率对CPET峰值运动相关指标的影响。方法:选择12名健康志愿者在一周...目的:观察健康志愿者不同功率递增速率完成症状限制性极限心肺运动试验(CPET)对CPET峰值运动相关核心指标的影响,及运动中呼吸交换率(RER)的变化。以探讨不同功率递增速率对CPET峰值运动相关指标的影响。方法:选择12名健康志愿者在一周内不同工作天随机完成中等适度程度(30 W/min)及比较低(10 W/min)和比较高(60 W/min)3种不同功率递增速率CPET。按标准方法比较CPET数据主要峰值运动核心指标:峰值运动时的摄氧量、二氧化碳排出量、负荷功率、呼吸频率、潮气量、分钟通气量、心率、血压和氧脉搏,运动持续时间和CPET各时段的RER。对三组不同功率递增速率下各个指标的差异进行组间两两比较。结果:与中等适度功率递增速率组比较,比较低和比较高功率递增速率组的峰值功率分别显著地降低和升高((162.04±41.59)W/min vs(132.92±34.55)W/min vs(197.42±46.14)W/min,P<0.01);运动时间显著延长和缩短((5.69±1.33)min vs(13.49±3.43)min vs(3.56±0.76)min,P<0.01);峰值RER(1.27±0.07 vs 1.18±0.06 vs 1.33±0.08,P<0.01~P<0.05)与恢复期RER最大值(1.72±0.16 vs 1.61±0.11 vs 1.81±0.14,P<0.01~P<0.05)均显著降低和升高。结论:不同功率递增速率CPET显著改变峰值运动时的功率、运动持续时间、峰值RER和恢复期最大RER。CPET规范化操作要选择个体化适合受试者的中等适度功率递增速率,而且也不能以某一固定的RER值作为保证安全、受试者达到极限运动和提前终止运动的依据。展开更多
Purpose： The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of acute exercise on motor response inhibition using both behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Methods： The P3 and N1 event-related potenti...Purpose： The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of acute exercise on motor response inhibition using both behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Methods： The P3 and N1 event-related potential （ERP） components were recorded while performing a stop-signal task in 21 college students following a moderately intense acute exercise bout for 30 min and a sedentary control session that involved reading. Results： Acute exercise induced a shorter stop signal response time （SSRT） as compared to control; however, the go response time （Go RT） remained unchanged. In examining the ERP data, acute exercise increased both P3 amplitude and latency but did not affect the N1 component. Conclusion： Acute exercise has a selective and beneficial effect on cognitive function, specifically affecting the motor response inhibition aspect of executive function. Furthermore, acute exercise predominately impacts later stages of information processing during motor response inhibition, which may lead to an increase in attentional resource allocation and confer the ability to successfully withhold a response to achieve motor response inhibition.展开更多
文摘目的:观察健康志愿者不同功率递增速率完成症状限制性极限心肺运动试验(CPET)对CPET峰值运动相关核心指标的影响,及运动中呼吸交换率(RER)的变化。以探讨不同功率递增速率对CPET峰值运动相关指标的影响。方法:选择12名健康志愿者在一周内不同工作天随机完成中等适度程度(30 W/min)及比较低(10 W/min)和比较高(60 W/min)3种不同功率递增速率CPET。按标准方法比较CPET数据主要峰值运动核心指标:峰值运动时的摄氧量、二氧化碳排出量、负荷功率、呼吸频率、潮气量、分钟通气量、心率、血压和氧脉搏,运动持续时间和CPET各时段的RER。对三组不同功率递增速率下各个指标的差异进行组间两两比较。结果:与中等适度功率递增速率组比较,比较低和比较高功率递增速率组的峰值功率分别显著地降低和升高((162.04±41.59)W/min vs(132.92±34.55)W/min vs(197.42±46.14)W/min,P<0.01);运动时间显著延长和缩短((5.69±1.33)min vs(13.49±3.43)min vs(3.56±0.76)min,P<0.01);峰值RER(1.27±0.07 vs 1.18±0.06 vs 1.33±0.08,P<0.01~P<0.05)与恢复期RER最大值(1.72±0.16 vs 1.61±0.11 vs 1.81±0.14,P<0.01~P<0.05)均显著降低和升高。结论:不同功率递增速率CPET显著改变峰值运动时的功率、运动持续时间、峰值RER和恢复期最大RER。CPET规范化操作要选择个体化适合受试者的中等适度功率递增速率,而且也不能以某一固定的RER值作为保证安全、受试者达到极限运动和提前终止运动的依据。
基金supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology to Yu-Kai Chang (NSC 102-2410-H-179-014-MY3)
文摘Purpose： The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of acute exercise on motor response inhibition using both behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Methods： The P3 and N1 event-related potential （ERP） components were recorded while performing a stop-signal task in 21 college students following a moderately intense acute exercise bout for 30 min and a sedentary control session that involved reading. Results： Acute exercise induced a shorter stop signal response time （SSRT） as compared to control; however, the go response time （Go RT） remained unchanged. In examining the ERP data, acute exercise increased both P3 amplitude and latency but did not affect the N1 component. Conclusion： Acute exercise has a selective and beneficial effect on cognitive function, specifically affecting the motor response inhibition aspect of executive function. Furthermore, acute exercise predominately impacts later stages of information processing during motor response inhibition, which may lead to an increase in attentional resource allocation and confer the ability to successfully withhold a response to achieve motor response inhibition.
