目的分析简体中文版儿童生活质量普通适用核心量表4.0(The pediaric quality of life inventory measurement methods,PedsQL4.0)代评式量表在气管切开儿童中的信度和效度。方法选取上海市某三甲儿童医院2011-2014年行气管切开的56名2~1...目的分析简体中文版儿童生活质量普通适用核心量表4.0(The pediaric quality of life inventory measurement methods,PedsQL4.0)代评式量表在气管切开儿童中的信度和效度。方法选取上海市某三甲儿童医院2011-2014年行气管切开的56名2~18岁的儿童家长和上海市某三甲儿童医院家中有健康儿童的职工47名进行中文版PedsQL 4.0调查,用Cronbach’sα系数表示量表的信度,采用Mannk-Whitney U检验、Spearman秩相关分析其效度。结果中文版PedsQL 4.0家长代评量表全量表、生理领域、心理社会领域的Cronbach’sα分别为0.960、0.939和0.929,表明有较好的内部一致性;气管切开术后儿童的各方面得分均低于正常儿童,差别有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论中文版PedsQL 4.0普通适用家长代评量表具有良好的内部一致性;该量表具有较好的区分效度和内容效度,可适用气管切开术后患儿生活质量的评估,尤其是父母代评量表。展开更多
目的评估特异性生活质量调查(disease specific quality of life for children with obstructive sleep apnea 18 items survey,OSA-18)量表及简体中文版儿童睡眠问卷(pediatric sleep questionnair,PSQ)在学龄前打鼾儿童中筛查阻塞性...目的评估特异性生活质量调查(disease specific quality of life for children with obstructive sleep apnea 18 items survey,OSA-18)量表及简体中文版儿童睡眠问卷(pediatric sleep questionnair,PSQ)在学龄前打鼾儿童中筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)中的临床实用价值。方法横断面研究选取141例患者,有打鼾伴张口呼吸问题并在南京市妇幼保健院进行了鼻咽部侧位片和整夜便携式睡眠监测(portable monitoring,PM),根据腺样体大小(A/N比值)及阻塞性呼吸暂停低通气指数(OAHI)、最低血氧饱和度(lowest oxygen saturation,LSaO_(2))将患者进行分组。由患儿家长填写OSA-18量表及PSQ。比较不同分组患儿的OSA-18量表及PSQ各个维度评分及总分,分析PM和A/N比值与OSA-18及PSQ评分的相关性,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定最佳临界点。结果OSA组及低氧血症组OSA-18总分及各维度评分均高于非OSA组及非低氧血症组,OSA组及低氧血症组PSQ除嗜睡及其他维度,其余各维度评分及总分均高于非OSA组及低氧血症组;腺样体病理性肥大组OSA-18除身体症状及日间功能维度,其余各维度评分及总分均高于腺样体非病理性肥大组,PSQ总分及呼吸评分高于腺样体非病理性肥大组,以上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A/N比值与OSA-18除日间功能外其他各维度及总分呈显著正相关,与PSQ总分、呼吸评分呈显著正相关(P<0.05);OAHI与OSA-18总分及各维度呈显著正相关,与PSQ除其他外各维度及总分呈显著正相关(P<0.05);LSaO_(2)与OSA-18总分及各维度评分呈显著负相关,与PSQ总分、呼吸、行为维度呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。PSQ总分评价是否是OSA及是否存在低氧血症的最佳临界点均为6.5分,OSA-18总分评价是否是OSA及是否存在低氧血症的最佳临界点均为46.5分。结论OSA-18量表及PSQ可作为筛查学龄前儿童OSA、评估缺氧程度及推测腺样体肥大程度的可靠辅助检查。展开更多
目的 比较健康调查简表(the MOS item short from health survey,SF-36)和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织肿瘤肺癌患者生存质量量表(the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire,E...目的 比较健康调查简表(the MOS item short from health survey,SF-36)和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织肿瘤肺癌患者生存质量量表(the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire,EORTC QLQ-LC43)在肺癌患者生活质量测定中的应用效果。方法 选取2020年9月—2022年6月158例肺癌患者作为研究对象,分别采用SF-36量表和EORTC QLQ-LC43量表调查受试对象的生活质量,采用Pearson线性相关性分析比较两种量表不同维度评分之间的相关性,以Karnofsky评分(KPS评分)功能状态评分作为效标,比较两种生存质量量表的相关性及效度。结果 SF-36量表总克朗巴赫系数为0.766,分量表克朗巴赫系数为0.493~0.849。SF-36量表的躯体功能、躯体角色、躯体疼痛、情感职能、社会活动、一般健康等6个分量表分别与EORTC QLQ-LC43量表的躯体功能、角色功能、疼痛、情绪功能、社会功能、整体生活质量的6个分量表对应,其相关系数为0.784~0.842,相关性差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。上述对应的分量表具有中等程度的一致性(Kappa值> 0.4)。不同临床分期分组中,肺癌患者SF-36各个维度得分与肿瘤分期显著相关,肿瘤分期越晚,生存质量得分越低(P<0.001)。肺癌患者SF-36各个维度得分与患者的体力状态得分显著相关,体力状态越差,生存质量得分越低(P <0.001)。结论 与EORTC QLQ-LC43量表相比,SF-36量表在评价肺癌患者生活质量方面具有较高的一致性和区分能力,可以作为EORTC QLQ-LC43量表的替代。展开更多
To measure the effects of atopic dermatitis (AD) on the quality of life of affected young children and their families, we developed a prototype 62- item instrument, the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS)...To measure the effects of atopic dermatitis (AD) on the quality of life of affected young children and their families, we developed a prototype 62- item instrument, the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS). The prototype CADIS was developed from a comprehensive conceptual framework based on data from parents and clinicians. The instrument had eight subscales (four each for child and parent): physical health, emotional health, physical functioning, and social functioning. The goal of this work was to test the validity of and to refine the prototype of CADIS. Two hundred seventy parents of children under the age of 6 y with AD responded to the instrument. Content validity was demonstrated by expert and parent reviews of the drafted and refined instrument, and by analyzing parents’ responses to open-ended questions about their children’ s skin disease. Construct validity was assessed in exploratory factor analyses which supported a refinement in the conceptual framework to consist of two dimensions with five domains: child dimensions (symptoms and activity limitation/behavior)-, and parent dimensions (family/ social function, sleep, and emotions). Seventeen items were eliminated, yielding a 45- item refined version of CADIS (score 0- 180) with evidence of content and construct validity and suggested use in clinical research.展开更多
文摘目的评估特异性生活质量调查(disease specific quality of life for children with obstructive sleep apnea 18 items survey,OSA-18)量表及简体中文版儿童睡眠问卷(pediatric sleep questionnair,PSQ)在学龄前打鼾儿童中筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)中的临床实用价值。方法横断面研究选取141例患者,有打鼾伴张口呼吸问题并在南京市妇幼保健院进行了鼻咽部侧位片和整夜便携式睡眠监测(portable monitoring,PM),根据腺样体大小(A/N比值)及阻塞性呼吸暂停低通气指数(OAHI)、最低血氧饱和度(lowest oxygen saturation,LSaO_(2))将患者进行分组。由患儿家长填写OSA-18量表及PSQ。比较不同分组患儿的OSA-18量表及PSQ各个维度评分及总分,分析PM和A/N比值与OSA-18及PSQ评分的相关性,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定最佳临界点。结果OSA组及低氧血症组OSA-18总分及各维度评分均高于非OSA组及非低氧血症组,OSA组及低氧血症组PSQ除嗜睡及其他维度,其余各维度评分及总分均高于非OSA组及低氧血症组;腺样体病理性肥大组OSA-18除身体症状及日间功能维度,其余各维度评分及总分均高于腺样体非病理性肥大组,PSQ总分及呼吸评分高于腺样体非病理性肥大组,以上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A/N比值与OSA-18除日间功能外其他各维度及总分呈显著正相关,与PSQ总分、呼吸评分呈显著正相关(P<0.05);OAHI与OSA-18总分及各维度呈显著正相关,与PSQ除其他外各维度及总分呈显著正相关(P<0.05);LSaO_(2)与OSA-18总分及各维度评分呈显著负相关,与PSQ总分、呼吸、行为维度呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。PSQ总分评价是否是OSA及是否存在低氧血症的最佳临界点均为6.5分,OSA-18总分评价是否是OSA及是否存在低氧血症的最佳临界点均为46.5分。结论OSA-18量表及PSQ可作为筛查学龄前儿童OSA、评估缺氧程度及推测腺样体肥大程度的可靠辅助检查。
文摘目的 比较健康调查简表(the MOS item short from health survey,SF-36)和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织肿瘤肺癌患者生存质量量表(the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire,EORTC QLQ-LC43)在肺癌患者生活质量测定中的应用效果。方法 选取2020年9月—2022年6月158例肺癌患者作为研究对象,分别采用SF-36量表和EORTC QLQ-LC43量表调查受试对象的生活质量,采用Pearson线性相关性分析比较两种量表不同维度评分之间的相关性,以Karnofsky评分(KPS评分)功能状态评分作为效标,比较两种生存质量量表的相关性及效度。结果 SF-36量表总克朗巴赫系数为0.766,分量表克朗巴赫系数为0.493~0.849。SF-36量表的躯体功能、躯体角色、躯体疼痛、情感职能、社会活动、一般健康等6个分量表分别与EORTC QLQ-LC43量表的躯体功能、角色功能、疼痛、情绪功能、社会功能、整体生活质量的6个分量表对应,其相关系数为0.784~0.842,相关性差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。上述对应的分量表具有中等程度的一致性(Kappa值> 0.4)。不同临床分期分组中,肺癌患者SF-36各个维度得分与肿瘤分期显著相关,肿瘤分期越晚,生存质量得分越低(P<0.001)。肺癌患者SF-36各个维度得分与患者的体力状态得分显著相关,体力状态越差,生存质量得分越低(P <0.001)。结论 与EORTC QLQ-LC43量表相比,SF-36量表在评价肺癌患者生活质量方面具有较高的一致性和区分能力,可以作为EORTC QLQ-LC43量表的替代。
文摘To measure the effects of atopic dermatitis (AD) on the quality of life of affected young children and their families, we developed a prototype 62- item instrument, the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS). The prototype CADIS was developed from a comprehensive conceptual framework based on data from parents and clinicians. The instrument had eight subscales (four each for child and parent): physical health, emotional health, physical functioning, and social functioning. The goal of this work was to test the validity of and to refine the prototype of CADIS. Two hundred seventy parents of children under the age of 6 y with AD responded to the instrument. Content validity was demonstrated by expert and parent reviews of the drafted and refined instrument, and by analyzing parents’ responses to open-ended questions about their children’ s skin disease. Construct validity was assessed in exploratory factor analyses which supported a refinement in the conceptual framework to consist of two dimensions with five domains: child dimensions (symptoms and activity limitation/behavior)-, and parent dimensions (family/ social function, sleep, and emotions). Seventeen items were eliminated, yielding a 45- item refined version of CADIS (score 0- 180) with evidence of content and construct validity and suggested use in clinical research.