目的:修订儿童边缘人格特征量表(Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children, BPFS-C)并进行信效度检验。方法:按量表翻译程序翻译成中文并对446名普通中学生进行施测,其中一半用于探索性因素分析,另一半用于验证性因素分析,...目的:修订儿童边缘人格特征量表(Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children, BPFS-C)并进行信效度检验。方法:按量表翻译程序翻译成中文并对446名普通中学生进行施测,其中一半用于探索性因素分析,另一半用于验证性因素分析,并以人格组织量表、长处与困难问卷和自杀自伤量表为效标。选取重庆地区389名困境儿童和贵州地区373名留守儿童为被试,验证修订后的BPFS-C在困境和留守儿童样本中的因素结构是否与普通中学生相同。结果:经探索性因素分析,得到与原量表一致的四因素结构,累积方差解释率为50.08%。普通中学生样本、困境儿童样本、留守儿童样本验证性因素分析结果符合心理测量学要求(普通:掊2/df=1.86,RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.91,AGFI=0.88,CFI=0.86;困境:掊2/df=2.18,RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.91,CFI=0.91;留守:掊2/df=2.66,RMSEA=0.07,GFI=0.92,AGFI=0.89,CFI=0.88)。修订后BPFS-C总分与各效标量表总分相关显著(r=0.69,0.51,0.28,p<0.01)。全量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.80。结论:修订后的BPFS-C中文版具有良好的信效度,可用于中国文化背景下对儿童边缘人格特征的测量。展开更多
目的:探讨神经性厌食患者的人格特征及焦虑抑郁症状,为临床治疗和疾病预防提供参考依据。方法:选取94例同时符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)和美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-Ⅳ)诊断标准的神经性厌食患者,其中限食...目的:探讨神经性厌食患者的人格特征及焦虑抑郁症状,为临床治疗和疾病预防提供参考依据。方法:选取94例同时符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)和美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-Ⅳ)诊断标准的神经性厌食患者,其中限食型41例,暴食/清除型53例;选取72例某精神专科医院实习护士为对照组。两组均采用明尼苏达多项人格(MMPI)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)进行测查。结果:病例组抑郁症状(85.1%vs.8.3%)和焦虑症状(75.5%vs.2.8%)的检出率高于对照组(均P<0.05)。病例组M M PI测试结果除男子-女子气、说谎量表、诈病量表、校正量表的T分与对照组无统计学差异外(均P>0.05),精神病态、抑郁、癔病、疑病、偏执、精神衰弱、精神分裂症、轻躁狂及社会内向的T分均高于对照组(均P<0.05);T分最高的量表分为精神病态(Pd)(63.8±11.2),其次是抑郁(D)(61.0±12.8),两点编码呈现24/42编码。暴食/清除型患者的疑病(Hs)的T分高于限食型[(53.3±9.9)vs.(58.7±9.3),P<0.05]。结论:神经性厌食患者有其特定的人格特征,尤其是精神病态和抑郁更为突出。展开更多
Objective: To explore personality characteristics and personality types of drug users. Methods: 192 cases of drug users were tested using CPI and the cluster analysis was based on the data of 20 sub-scales. Results: F...Objective: To explore personality characteristics and personality types of drug users. Methods: 192 cases of drug users were tested using CPI and the cluster analysis was based on the data of 20 sub-scales. Results: First, in Sociability and Flexibility two sub-scales the drug user present better than the normal group, but in other sub-scales were worse or much worse such as Responsibility, Socialization, Sense of Wellbeing, Achievement Via Conformance and Achievement Via Independence sub-scales. Second, 192 cases of drug users were divided into four groups by hierarchical cluster analysis, they were Sociality, Idleness, Independence and Conformance. Conclusion: The drug users had some special personality characteristics and they were divided into four typical personality types.展开更多
文摘目的:修订儿童边缘人格特征量表(Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children, BPFS-C)并进行信效度检验。方法:按量表翻译程序翻译成中文并对446名普通中学生进行施测,其中一半用于探索性因素分析,另一半用于验证性因素分析,并以人格组织量表、长处与困难问卷和自杀自伤量表为效标。选取重庆地区389名困境儿童和贵州地区373名留守儿童为被试,验证修订后的BPFS-C在困境和留守儿童样本中的因素结构是否与普通中学生相同。结果:经探索性因素分析,得到与原量表一致的四因素结构,累积方差解释率为50.08%。普通中学生样本、困境儿童样本、留守儿童样本验证性因素分析结果符合心理测量学要求(普通:掊2/df=1.86,RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.91,AGFI=0.88,CFI=0.86;困境:掊2/df=2.18,RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.91,CFI=0.91;留守:掊2/df=2.66,RMSEA=0.07,GFI=0.92,AGFI=0.89,CFI=0.88)。修订后BPFS-C总分与各效标量表总分相关显著(r=0.69,0.51,0.28,p<0.01)。全量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.80。结论:修订后的BPFS-C中文版具有良好的信效度,可用于中国文化背景下对儿童边缘人格特征的测量。
文摘目的:探讨神经性厌食患者的人格特征及焦虑抑郁症状,为临床治疗和疾病预防提供参考依据。方法:选取94例同时符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)和美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-Ⅳ)诊断标准的神经性厌食患者,其中限食型41例,暴食/清除型53例;选取72例某精神专科医院实习护士为对照组。两组均采用明尼苏达多项人格(MMPI)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)进行测查。结果:病例组抑郁症状(85.1%vs.8.3%)和焦虑症状(75.5%vs.2.8%)的检出率高于对照组(均P<0.05)。病例组M M PI测试结果除男子-女子气、说谎量表、诈病量表、校正量表的T分与对照组无统计学差异外(均P>0.05),精神病态、抑郁、癔病、疑病、偏执、精神衰弱、精神分裂症、轻躁狂及社会内向的T分均高于对照组(均P<0.05);T分最高的量表分为精神病态(Pd)(63.8±11.2),其次是抑郁(D)(61.0±12.8),两点编码呈现24/42编码。暴食/清除型患者的疑病(Hs)的T分高于限食型[(53.3±9.9)vs.(58.7±9.3),P<0.05]。结论:神经性厌食患者有其特定的人格特征,尤其是精神病态和抑郁更为突出。
文摘Objective: To explore personality characteristics and personality types of drug users. Methods: 192 cases of drug users were tested using CPI and the cluster analysis was based on the data of 20 sub-scales. Results: First, in Sociability and Flexibility two sub-scales the drug user present better than the normal group, but in other sub-scales were worse or much worse such as Responsibility, Socialization, Sense of Wellbeing, Achievement Via Conformance and Achievement Via Independence sub-scales. Second, 192 cases of drug users were divided into four groups by hierarchical cluster analysis, they were Sociality, Idleness, Independence and Conformance. Conclusion: The drug users had some special personality characteristics and they were divided into four typical personality types.