Numerical methods such as finite difference, finite volume, finite element or hybrid methods have been globally used to successfully study fluid flow in porous stratum of which aquifers are typical examples. Those met...Numerical methods such as finite difference, finite volume, finite element or hybrid methods have been globally used to successfully study fluid flow in porous stratum of which aquifers are typical examples. Those methods involve mathematical expressions which increases computation time with requirement of specific human expertise. In this paper, numerical models for single phase flow in 1D and 2D using the conservation of mass principles, Darcy＇s flow equation, equation of state, continuity equation and the STB/CFB （stock tank barrel/cubic feet barrel） balance were developed. The models were then recast into pressure vorticity equations using convectional algorithms. Derived equations were used to formulate transport equations which resemble the conventional vorticity transport equation. Formulated numerical models were used to investigate the daily instantaneous aquifer pressure drawdowns and pressure heads for 365 days. The developed equations were subsequently solved using cellular vortex element technique. The developed computer program was used to investigate confined aquifer of dimensions 10× 10 × 75 m with single vertex image. For the aquifer rate of 0.5 m3/s, 0.1 m3/s, 0.15 m3/s, 0.2 m3/s, 0.25 m3/s, 1.0 m3/s, 2.0 m3/s, 2.5 m3/s, 3.0 m3/s, 4.0 m3/s, the respective average head drawdowns and heads were, 1.127 ±0.0141 m, 1.317 ±0.0104 m, 1.412± 0.0041 m, 1.427 ± 0.116 m,1.527 ± 0.0141 m, 2.107 ± 0.0171 m, 2.197 ±0.0191 m, 3.007±0.0171 m, 3.127 ± 0.0041 m, 3.626 ± 0.0121 m, and 25 kN/m2, 35 kN/m2, 33 kN/m2, 5 kN/m2, 6 kN/m2, 11 kN/m2, 25 kN/m2, 42 kN/m2, 50 kN/m2, 62 kN/m2, respectively. Cellular vortex technique with relative little mathematics has been established to have recorded successes in numerical modeling of fluid flow in aquifer simulation.展开更多
文摘Numerical methods such as finite difference, finite volume, finite element or hybrid methods have been globally used to successfully study fluid flow in porous stratum of which aquifers are typical examples. Those methods involve mathematical expressions which increases computation time with requirement of specific human expertise. In this paper, numerical models for single phase flow in 1D and 2D using the conservation of mass principles, Darcy＇s flow equation, equation of state, continuity equation and the STB/CFB （stock tank barrel/cubic feet barrel） balance were developed. The models were then recast into pressure vorticity equations using convectional algorithms. Derived equations were used to formulate transport equations which resemble the conventional vorticity transport equation. Formulated numerical models were used to investigate the daily instantaneous aquifer pressure drawdowns and pressure heads for 365 days. The developed equations were subsequently solved using cellular vortex element technique. The developed computer program was used to investigate confined aquifer of dimensions 10× 10 × 75 m with single vertex image. For the aquifer rate of 0.5 m3/s, 0.1 m3/s, 0.15 m3/s, 0.2 m3/s, 0.25 m3/s, 1.0 m3/s, 2.0 m3/s, 2.5 m3/s, 3.0 m3/s, 4.0 m3/s, the respective average head drawdowns and heads were, 1.127 ±0.0141 m, 1.317 ±0.0104 m, 1.412± 0.0041 m, 1.427 ± 0.116 m,1.527 ± 0.0141 m, 2.107 ± 0.0171 m, 2.197 ±0.0191 m, 3.007±0.0171 m, 3.127 ± 0.0041 m, 3.626 ± 0.0121 m, and 25 kN/m2, 35 kN/m2, 33 kN/m2, 5 kN/m2, 6 kN/m2, 11 kN/m2, 25 kN/m2, 42 kN/m2, 50 kN/m2, 62 kN/m2, respectively. Cellular vortex technique with relative little mathematics has been established to have recorded successes in numerical modeling of fluid flow in aquifer simulation.
