“时间概念的先验阐明”就是要阐明时间作为我们感性直观的形式如何使得算术成为可能。这一点在康德第二版《纯粹理性批判》中并没有直接论述出来,但是根据康德对于算术作为“先天综合命题”的论述及其他表述,可以指向“时间概念的先验...“时间概念的先验阐明”就是要阐明时间作为我们感性直观的形式如何使得算术成为可能。这一点在康德第二版《纯粹理性批判》中并没有直接论述出来,但是根据康德对于算术作为“先天综合命题”的论述及其他表述,可以指向“时间概念的先验阐明”的可能性。问题的突破点就在于把握康德时间与空间之间的关系,从“时间无形状,空间无相继”出发,“数”及“数”的运算借助空间表象而直观化,但是空间表象不能构成“数”的概念,“数”是时间概念,只有在时间中才得以可能。康德“数”的概念,是以时间关系为基础的,体现的是一种独属于时间的关系,并且康德时空观基础上“数”的概念体现出了他对于以往时空观的超越。The prior exposition of the concept of time aims to clarify how time, as our intuitive and intuitive form, makes arithmetic possible. This point is not directly discussed in Kant’s second edition of “Critique of Pure Reason”, but according to Kant’s discourse on arithmetic as an “innate synthesis proposition” and other expressions, it can point to the possibility of “a priori exposition of the concept of time”. The breakthrough point of the problem lies in grasping the relationship between Kant’s time and space. Starting from “time has no shape, space has no sequence”, “number” and “number” operations are visualized through spatial representations. However, spatial representations cannot constitute the concept of “number”. “Number” is a concept of time and can only be possible in time. Kant’s concept of “number” is based on the relationship of time, reflecting a relationship that belongs exclusively to time, and Kant’s concept of “number” on the basis of his view of time and space reflects his transcendence of previous views on time and space.展开更多
文摘“时间概念的先验阐明”就是要阐明时间作为我们感性直观的形式如何使得算术成为可能。这一点在康德第二版《纯粹理性批判》中并没有直接论述出来,但是根据康德对于算术作为“先天综合命题”的论述及其他表述,可以指向“时间概念的先验阐明”的可能性。问题的突破点就在于把握康德时间与空间之间的关系,从“时间无形状,空间无相继”出发,“数”及“数”的运算借助空间表象而直观化,但是空间表象不能构成“数”的概念,“数”是时间概念,只有在时间中才得以可能。康德“数”的概念,是以时间关系为基础的,体现的是一种独属于时间的关系,并且康德时空观基础上“数”的概念体现出了他对于以往时空观的超越。The prior exposition of the concept of time aims to clarify how time, as our intuitive and intuitive form, makes arithmetic possible. This point is not directly discussed in Kant’s second edition of “Critique of Pure Reason”, but according to Kant’s discourse on arithmetic as an “innate synthesis proposition” and other expressions, it can point to the possibility of “a priori exposition of the concept of time”. The breakthrough point of the problem lies in grasping the relationship between Kant’s time and space. Starting from “time has no shape, space has no sequence”, “number” and “number” operations are visualized through spatial representations. However, spatial representations cannot constitute the concept of “number”. “Number” is a concept of time and can only be possible in time. Kant’s concept of “number” is based on the relationship of time, reflecting a relationship that belongs exclusively to time, and Kant’s concept of “number” on the basis of his view of time and space reflects his transcendence of previous views on time and space.
