英语中有这样一种词组,它由三个单词构成,第一个与第三个单词的基本意义均与数量有关,而中间则为并列连词or或and。本文现对这类词组作一归纳。一、数量词+or+数量词1.all or nothing全或无;全部都有或全都没有;走极端;要么全干,要么不...英语中有这样一种词组,它由三个单词构成,第一个与第三个单词的基本意义均与数量有关,而中间则为并列连词or或and。本文现对这类词组作一归纳。一、数量词+or+数量词1.all or nothing全或无;全部都有或全都没有;走极端;要么全干,要么不干;需要作出全部努力。展开更多
Background-We investigated the pattern of late luminal loss after sirolimus- eluting or bare stem implantation. Methods and Results -The study population co mprised 238 patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents a...Background-We investigated the pattern of late luminal loss after sirolimus- eluting or bare stem implantation. Methods and Results -The study population co mprised 238 patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents and 526 patients tre ated with conventional stents. The distribution of late loss of sirolimus stents was largely skewed to the right and differed from the distribution for bare ste nts. When divided according to the presence of binary restenosis(diameter stenos is >50%), restenotic lesions in the bare stem group(26.0%) had a late loss of 1.40±0.64 mm and in the sirolimus group(7.9%) of 1.16±0.76 mm. Nonrestenotic lesions in the bare stent group had a late loss of 0.58±0.44 mm, whereas the la te loss of nonrestenotic lesions in the sirolimus group remained close to zero( -0.05±0.33 mm). Differences between poststenting and follow-up measurements i n the sirolimus group(late loss) resembled variations observed in repeated angio graphic measurements, as assessed from a random sample of 30 segments measured r epeatedly. After multivariate adjustment, stent type did not influence the degre e of late loss in restenotic lesions. However, nonrestenotic bare stents had a s ignificantly larger estimated luminal loss (0.58 mm; 95%CI, 0.52 to 0.65) than sirolimus-eluting stents, for which the predicted late loss was almost 0(-0.04 mm; 95%CI, -0.10 to 0.02). Conclusions -The pattern of late loss after sirol imus-eluting stent implantation follows a peculiar behavior, different from les ions treated with conventional stents. Whether this is explained by an unusual s tatistical distribution or a biological all-or-none response of restenosis aft er sirolimus-eluting stenting remains to be investigated.展开更多
Objective: To assess the evolution of individual renal function during the mat uration process in terms of single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SKGFR) and split function in children with unilateral complex renal ...Objective: To assess the evolution of individual renal function during the mat uration process in terms of single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SKGFR) and split function in children with unilateral complex renal duplication. Study des ign: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 44 children with unilateral comp lex duplex kidney. All affected kidneys had a poor or nonfunctioning dysplastic moiety, 28 in the upper pole and 16 in the lower pole. At least 2 radioisotopic examinations, including a 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (99mTc-MAG3) renogram and a plasma clearance of 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Cr-51 EDTA), were performed in all children, the first one performed at a median age of 3 mon ths (range 2 to 15 months) and the last one at 24 months (range 12 to 120 months ). They allowed a precise estimation of split renal function, overall glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and SKGFR. Results: Mean overall kidney GFR increased si gnificantly between the two measurements from 63 ±12.7 mL/minute/1.73m2 to 95 ±21 mL/minute/1.73m 2 (P < .0001). SKGFR of the duplex side similarly increased from 26 ±7.7 mL/minute/1.73m2 to 38 ±12.6 mL/minute/1.73m2 (P < .0001). In te rms of split function, the affected kidney had a remarkable stable function betw een the two measurements, 40%±8.6 and 39%±8.3 (P = .94), respectively. Howev er, cases with the lowest initial split function ( < 30%) had the lowest initia l SKGFR and the worst further evolution. Conclusion: In children with unilateral complex renal duplication, we found on the affected side a significant increase of SKGFR because of renal maturation, whereas mean split function remained stab le during follow-up.展开更多
一、《死火》与“周氏兄弟”合译之《红星佚史》(一)“死火”宁可“烧完”也不愿“冻灭”,这一核心构想在中外文学史上并不难追认前驱。比如《新青年》1918年6月15日四卷六号(“易卜生号”),在胡适《易卜生主义》、罗家伦与胡适合译《...一、《死火》与“周氏兄弟”合译之《红星佚史》(一)“死火”宁可“烧完”也不愿“冻灭”,这一核心构想在中外文学史上并不难追认前驱。比如《新青年》1918年6月15日四卷六号(“易卜生号”),在胡适《易卜生主义》、罗家伦与胡适合译《娜拉》、陶履恭译《国民之敌》、吴弱男译《小爱友夫》之后,是作为“殿军”出现的袁振英所撰《易卜生传》①,其中提到易卜生前期诗剧《白兰特》(Brand,通译《勃兰特》)有所谓“All or Nothing之主义”,这句话后来被译为“全或无”而大行其道,鲁迅在《随感录(四十八)》(《新青年》六卷二号,1919年2月15日)结尾也提到“‘西哲’易卜生盖以为不能,以为不可。所以借了Brand的嘴说:‘All or nothing’”②。这是鲁迅借易卜生戏剧人物之口指出,中国人必须抛弃总爱在中外古今之间玩弄“折衷”的把戏,否则新思想永远不会彻底。“All or Nothing之主义”或“全或无”,就有点“死火”的决绝。展开更多
文摘Background-We investigated the pattern of late luminal loss after sirolimus- eluting or bare stem implantation. Methods and Results -The study population co mprised 238 patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents and 526 patients tre ated with conventional stents. The distribution of late loss of sirolimus stents was largely skewed to the right and differed from the distribution for bare ste nts. When divided according to the presence of binary restenosis(diameter stenos is >50%), restenotic lesions in the bare stem group(26.0%) had a late loss of 1.40±0.64 mm and in the sirolimus group(7.9%) of 1.16±0.76 mm. Nonrestenotic lesions in the bare stent group had a late loss of 0.58±0.44 mm, whereas the la te loss of nonrestenotic lesions in the sirolimus group remained close to zero( -0.05±0.33 mm). Differences between poststenting and follow-up measurements i n the sirolimus group(late loss) resembled variations observed in repeated angio graphic measurements, as assessed from a random sample of 30 segments measured r epeatedly. After multivariate adjustment, stent type did not influence the degre e of late loss in restenotic lesions. However, nonrestenotic bare stents had a s ignificantly larger estimated luminal loss (0.58 mm; 95%CI, 0.52 to 0.65) than sirolimus-eluting stents, for which the predicted late loss was almost 0(-0.04 mm; 95%CI, -0.10 to 0.02). Conclusions -The pattern of late loss after sirol imus-eluting stent implantation follows a peculiar behavior, different from les ions treated with conventional stents. Whether this is explained by an unusual s tatistical distribution or a biological all-or-none response of restenosis aft er sirolimus-eluting stenting remains to be investigated.
文摘Objective: To assess the evolution of individual renal function during the mat uration process in terms of single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SKGFR) and split function in children with unilateral complex renal duplication. Study des ign: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 44 children with unilateral comp lex duplex kidney. All affected kidneys had a poor or nonfunctioning dysplastic moiety, 28 in the upper pole and 16 in the lower pole. At least 2 radioisotopic examinations, including a 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (99mTc-MAG3) renogram and a plasma clearance of 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Cr-51 EDTA), were performed in all children, the first one performed at a median age of 3 mon ths (range 2 to 15 months) and the last one at 24 months (range 12 to 120 months ). They allowed a precise estimation of split renal function, overall glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and SKGFR. Results: Mean overall kidney GFR increased si gnificantly between the two measurements from 63 ±12.7 mL/minute/1.73m2 to 95 ±21 mL/minute/1.73m 2 (P < .0001). SKGFR of the duplex side similarly increased from 26 ±7.7 mL/minute/1.73m2 to 38 ±12.6 mL/minute/1.73m2 (P < .0001). In te rms of split function, the affected kidney had a remarkable stable function betw een the two measurements, 40%±8.6 and 39%±8.3 (P = .94), respectively. Howev er, cases with the lowest initial split function ( < 30%) had the lowest initia l SKGFR and the worst further evolution. Conclusion: In children with unilateral complex renal duplication, we found on the affected side a significant increase of SKGFR because of renal maturation, whereas mean split function remained stab le during follow-up.
文摘一、《死火》与“周氏兄弟”合译之《红星佚史》(一)“死火”宁可“烧完”也不愿“冻灭”,这一核心构想在中外文学史上并不难追认前驱。比如《新青年》1918年6月15日四卷六号(“易卜生号”),在胡适《易卜生主义》、罗家伦与胡适合译《娜拉》、陶履恭译《国民之敌》、吴弱男译《小爱友夫》之后,是作为“殿军”出现的袁振英所撰《易卜生传》①,其中提到易卜生前期诗剧《白兰特》(Brand,通译《勃兰特》)有所谓“All or Nothing之主义”,这句话后来被译为“全或无”而大行其道,鲁迅在《随感录(四十八)》(《新青年》六卷二号,1919年2月15日)结尾也提到“‘西哲’易卜生盖以为不能,以为不可。所以借了Brand的嘴说:‘All or nothing’”②。这是鲁迅借易卜生戏剧人物之口指出,中国人必须抛弃总爱在中外古今之间玩弄“折衷”的把戏,否则新思想永远不会彻底。“All or Nothing之主义”或“全或无”,就有点“死火”的决绝。
