达雅·屠苏(Daya Thussu)深耕国际传播领域近30年,现为清华大学苏世民书院客座教授,原英国威斯敏斯特大学国际传播学教授、中国传媒中心研究顾问、印度传媒中心创始人兼联合主任。他是国际知名学术期刊《全球媒体与传播》(Global Me...达雅·屠苏(Daya Thussu)深耕国际传播领域近30年,现为清华大学苏世民书院客座教授,原英国威斯敏斯特大学国际传播学教授、中国传媒中心研究顾问、印度传媒中心创始人兼联合主任。他是国际知名学术期刊《全球媒体与传播》(Global Media and Communication)的创始人兼主编,同时也是18本著作的作者或主编。他独著的《国际传播:延续与变革》(International Communication: Continuity and Change)一书是国际传播领域的权威著作,被译成多种文字,其中文版于2004年出版。展开更多
The elements that mid-wife news and editorial contents remain： what, who, where, when, why, and how, typical of Lasswell＇s （1948） conceptual model of communication. The operational actualization of this in theory ...The elements that mid-wife news and editorial contents remain： what, who, where, when, why, and how, typical of Lasswell＇s （1948） conceptual model of communication. The operational actualization of this in theory and practice exemplifies a paradigm of news and other editorial contents reporting slant that pays more attention to dramatizing events and incidents, at best exacerbating, psychologically, panic, apprehension, and tension, but hardly focusing on solution to critical situation in society. However, journalism may not always be about the curses; it could be about cures, particularly in regard to climate change/global warming issues in developing economies like Africa＇s. Hence, the thrust of this paper is a strong advocacy for curative journalism that should issue from a well fed body of science-based information on how to adapt to the menace of global warming palaver in developing nations of the world, especially Nigeria. It advances that new media scientific journalism that could benefit society should do more of probing solution rather than concentrate on the throes： the former acting as an anti-depressant journalism instead of a hopeless journalism.展开更多
文摘达雅·屠苏(Daya Thussu)深耕国际传播领域近30年,现为清华大学苏世民书院客座教授,原英国威斯敏斯特大学国际传播学教授、中国传媒中心研究顾问、印度传媒中心创始人兼联合主任。他是国际知名学术期刊《全球媒体与传播》(Global Media and Communication)的创始人兼主编,同时也是18本著作的作者或主编。他独著的《国际传播:延续与变革》(International Communication: Continuity and Change)一书是国际传播领域的权威著作,被译成多种文字,其中文版于2004年出版。
文摘The elements that mid-wife news and editorial contents remain： what, who, where, when, why, and how, typical of Lasswell＇s （1948） conceptual model of communication. The operational actualization of this in theory and practice exemplifies a paradigm of news and other editorial contents reporting slant that pays more attention to dramatizing events and incidents, at best exacerbating, psychologically, panic, apprehension, and tension, but hardly focusing on solution to critical situation in society. However, journalism may not always be about the curses; it could be about cures, particularly in regard to climate change/global warming issues in developing economies like Africa＇s. Hence, the thrust of this paper is a strong advocacy for curative journalism that should issue from a well fed body of science-based information on how to adapt to the menace of global warming palaver in developing nations of the world, especially Nigeria. It advances that new media scientific journalism that could benefit society should do more of probing solution rather than concentrate on the throes： the former acting as an anti-depressant journalism instead of a hopeless journalism.
