Postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD)remains a major issue that worsens the prognosis of elderly surgery patients.This article reviews the current research on the effect of different anesthesia methods and commonl...Postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD)remains a major issue that worsens the prognosis of elderly surgery patients.This article reviews the current research on the effect of different anesthesia methods and commonly utilized anesthetics on the incidence of POCD in elderly patients,aiming to provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms contributing to this condition and facilitate the development of more reasonable anesthesia protocols,ultimately reducing the incidence of POCD in elderly surgery patients.展开更多
The discovery and utilization of volatile anesthetics has significantly transformed surgical practices since their inception in the mid-19th century.Recently,a paradigm shift is observed as volatile anesthetics extend...The discovery and utilization of volatile anesthetics has significantly transformed surgical practices since their inception in the mid-19th century.Recently,a paradigm shift is observed as volatile anesthetics extend beyond traditional confines of the operating theatres,finding diverse applications in intensive care settings.In the dynamic landscape of intensive care,volatile anesthetics emerge as a promising avenue for addressing complex sedation requirements,managing refractory lung pathologies including acute respiratory distress syndrome and status asthmaticus,conditions of high sedative requirements including burns,high opioid or alcohol use and neurological conditions such as status epilepticus.Volatile anesthetics can be administered through either inhaled route via anesthetic machines/devices or through extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuitry,providing intensivists with multiple options to tailor therapy.Furthermore,their unique pharmacokinetic profiles render them titratable and empower clinicians to individualize management with heightened accuracy,mitigating risks associated with conventional sedation modalities.Despite the amounting enthusiasm for the use of these therapies,barriers to widespread utilization include expanding equipment availability,staff familiarity and training of safe use.This article delves into the realm of applying inhaled volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit through discussing their pharmacology,administration considerations in intensive care settings,complication considerations,and listing indications and evidence of the use of volatile anesthetics in the critically ill patient population.展开更多
目的研究单次亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮对全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术患者术后早期情绪反应及恢复情况的影响。方法采用回顾性分析,选取2022年10月至2023年4月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院收治的120例全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术患者为观察对象,...目的研究单次亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮对全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术患者术后早期情绪反应及恢复情况的影响。方法采用回顾性分析,选取2022年10月至2023年4月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院收治的120例全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术患者为观察对象,按照麻醉方式不同分为研究组(n=60)与对照组(n=60)。研究组全身麻醉诱导之前给予0.3 mg/kg体重艾司氯胺酮一次性静脉推注,对照组正常麻醉;两组患者全身麻醉诱导、手术过程中麻醉维持、手术完成之后静脉镇痛药物及方式一致。比较两组患者手术前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分与术后(24、48 h)恢复质量评分量表(QOR40)评分、术后(1、3、6、18、24 h)视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后(24、48 h)改良警觉/镇静评分(MOAA/S)量表评分、术后苏醒时间、术后首次排气时间、术后下床时间及术后不良反应发生率。结果术后48 h,研究组患者SAS、SDS评分均明显低于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组手术前后SAS、SDS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组术后48 h SAS、SDS评分分别为(44.21±4.58)、(41.26±5.09)分,均低于对照组[(52.84±5.69)、(51.03±6.48)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后24、48 h QOR40评分分别为(142.51±4.86)、(150.84±5.73)分,均高于对照组[(134.06±5.17)、(142.49±5.52)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后1、3、6、18、24 h VAS评分分别为(2.49±0.74)、(2.27±0.68)、(2.11±0.64)、(1.97±0.63)、(1.86±0.65)分,均低于对照组[(2.97±0.81)、(2.71±0.75)、(2.58±0.69)、(2.47±0.65)、(2.33±0.67)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后24、48 h MOAA/S评分分别为(141.42±14.51)、(150.28±14.86)分,均低于对照组[(133.19±13.18)、(142.22±13.47)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后首次排气、下床时间分别为(39.01±4.73)、(33.31±4.57)h,均明显短于对照组[(43.86±5.25)、(37.65±5.19)h],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后苏醒时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后总不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单次亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮用于全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术麻醉可有效缓解患者情绪反应,提升术后早期镇痛、镇静效果,缓解疼痛程度,提高术后恢复质量及速度,且不良反应少。展开更多
文摘Postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD)remains a major issue that worsens the prognosis of elderly surgery patients.This article reviews the current research on the effect of different anesthesia methods and commonly utilized anesthetics on the incidence of POCD in elderly patients,aiming to provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms contributing to this condition and facilitate the development of more reasonable anesthesia protocols,ultimately reducing the incidence of POCD in elderly surgery patients.
文摘The discovery and utilization of volatile anesthetics has significantly transformed surgical practices since their inception in the mid-19th century.Recently,a paradigm shift is observed as volatile anesthetics extend beyond traditional confines of the operating theatres,finding diverse applications in intensive care settings.In the dynamic landscape of intensive care,volatile anesthetics emerge as a promising avenue for addressing complex sedation requirements,managing refractory lung pathologies including acute respiratory distress syndrome and status asthmaticus,conditions of high sedative requirements including burns,high opioid or alcohol use and neurological conditions such as status epilepticus.Volatile anesthetics can be administered through either inhaled route via anesthetic machines/devices or through extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuitry,providing intensivists with multiple options to tailor therapy.Furthermore,their unique pharmacokinetic profiles render them titratable and empower clinicians to individualize management with heightened accuracy,mitigating risks associated with conventional sedation modalities.Despite the amounting enthusiasm for the use of these therapies,barriers to widespread utilization include expanding equipment availability,staff familiarity and training of safe use.This article delves into the realm of applying inhaled volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit through discussing their pharmacology,administration considerations in intensive care settings,complication considerations,and listing indications and evidence of the use of volatile anesthetics in the critically ill patient population.
文摘目的研究单次亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮对全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术患者术后早期情绪反应及恢复情况的影响。方法采用回顾性分析,选取2022年10月至2023年4月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院收治的120例全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术患者为观察对象,按照麻醉方式不同分为研究组(n=60)与对照组(n=60)。研究组全身麻醉诱导之前给予0.3 mg/kg体重艾司氯胺酮一次性静脉推注,对照组正常麻醉;两组患者全身麻醉诱导、手术过程中麻醉维持、手术完成之后静脉镇痛药物及方式一致。比较两组患者手术前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分与术后(24、48 h)恢复质量评分量表(QOR40)评分、术后(1、3、6、18、24 h)视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后(24、48 h)改良警觉/镇静评分(MOAA/S)量表评分、术后苏醒时间、术后首次排气时间、术后下床时间及术后不良反应发生率。结果术后48 h,研究组患者SAS、SDS评分均明显低于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组手术前后SAS、SDS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组术后48 h SAS、SDS评分分别为(44.21±4.58)、(41.26±5.09)分,均低于对照组[(52.84±5.69)、(51.03±6.48)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后24、48 h QOR40评分分别为(142.51±4.86)、(150.84±5.73)分,均高于对照组[(134.06±5.17)、(142.49±5.52)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后1、3、6、18、24 h VAS评分分别为(2.49±0.74)、(2.27±0.68)、(2.11±0.64)、(1.97±0.63)、(1.86±0.65)分,均低于对照组[(2.97±0.81)、(2.71±0.75)、(2.58±0.69)、(2.47±0.65)、(2.33±0.67)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后24、48 h MOAA/S评分分别为(141.42±14.51)、(150.28±14.86)分,均低于对照组[(133.19±13.18)、(142.22±13.47)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后首次排气、下床时间分别为(39.01±4.73)、(33.31±4.57)h,均明显短于对照组[(43.86±5.25)、(37.65±5.19)h],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后苏醒时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后总不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单次亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮用于全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术麻醉可有效缓解患者情绪反应,提升术后早期镇痛、镇静效果,缓解疼痛程度,提高术后恢复质量及速度,且不良反应少。
