The invention of the World Wide Web, especially the Web 2.0, originally led some sociologists to believe that this tool would have favoured the creation of a ＂collective intelligence＂ able to spread and increase the...The invention of the World Wide Web, especially the Web 2.0, originally led some sociologists to believe that this tool would have favoured the creation of a ＂collective intelligence＂ able to spread and increase the level of democracy in the society. Nowadays, as a matter of fact, Information and Communications Technologies （ICTs） continue excluding part of the population and contribute to a top-down organisation of the main streams of information neutralising active potentialities and risking, paradoxically, to isolate users who are not aware of the mechanisms of the lnternet. The ＂doxic＂ acceptance of web contents, structures, and tools indeed precludes some kinds of knowledge and some different models of participation, with significant consequences on the social construction of reality. As a result, a tendency emerges towards a virtual-only participation and the click-tivism seems more and more to be turning into a form of slack-tivism.展开更多
随着 Internet 的发展,计算机网络的应用已经渗透到人们生活的每一个角落,相应的安全也随着网络应用的不断扩展而变得越来越重要,尤其是电子政务的升起,对网络安全提出了更高的要求。电子政务已经成为政府部门最热门的话题,但是很难找...随着 Internet 的发展,计算机网络的应用已经渗透到人们生活的每一个角落,相应的安全也随着网络应用的不断扩展而变得越来越重要,尤其是电子政务的升起,对网络安全提出了更高的要求。电子政务已经成为政府部门最热门的话题,但是很难找到一个明确的定义。展开更多
文摘The invention of the World Wide Web, especially the Web 2.0, originally led some sociologists to believe that this tool would have favoured the creation of a ＂collective intelligence＂ able to spread and increase the level of democracy in the society. Nowadays, as a matter of fact, Information and Communications Technologies （ICTs） continue excluding part of the population and contribute to a top-down organisation of the main streams of information neutralising active potentialities and risking, paradoxically, to isolate users who are not aware of the mechanisms of the lnternet. The ＂doxic＂ acceptance of web contents, structures, and tools indeed precludes some kinds of knowledge and some different models of participation, with significant consequences on the social construction of reality. As a result, a tendency emerges towards a virtual-only participation and the click-tivism seems more and more to be turning into a form of slack-tivism.
