AIM:To compare the effects of telbivudine (LDT) and entecavir (ETV) in treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B by meta-analysis. METHODS:We conducted a literature search using PubMed, M...AIM:To compare the effects of telbivudine (LDT) and entecavir (ETV) in treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B by meta-analysis. METHODS:We conducted a literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the VIP database, the Wanfang database and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register for all relevant articles published before April 1, 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LDT with ETV for treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B were included. The data was analyzed with Review Manager Software 5.0. We used relative risk (RR) as an effect measure, and reported its 95% CI. Meta-analysis was performed using either a fixedeffect or random-effect model, based on the absence or presence of significant heterogeneity. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and extracted data indepen- dently and in duplicate. The analysis was executed using the main outcome parameters including hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA undetectability, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion, drug-resistance, and adverse reactions. Meta-analysis of the included trials and subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the association between pre-specified characteristics with the therapeutic effects of the two agents. RESULTS:Thirteen eligible trials (3925 patients in total) were included and evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. In various treatment durations of 4 wk, 8 wk, 12 wk, 24 wk, 36 wk, 48 wk, 52 wk, 60 wk and 72 wk, the rates of HBV DNA undetectability and ALT normalization in the two groups were similar, without statistical significance. At 4 wk and 8 wk of the treatment, no statistical differences were found in the rate of HBeAg loss between the two groups, while the rate in the LDT group was higher than in the ETV group at 12 wk, 24 wk, 48 wk and 52 wk, respectively (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.16, 7.03, P = 0.02; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.16, 1.82, P = 0.001; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11, 1.89, P = 0.006; and RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.04, 3.32, P = 0.04). At 4 wk, 8 wk, 60 wk and 72 wk of the treatment, there were no significant differences in the rate of HBeAg seroconversion between the two groups, while at 12 wk, 24 wk, 48 wk and 52 wk, the rate in the LDT group was higher than in the ETV group (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.36, 3.24, P = 0.0008; RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.29, 2.28, P = 0.0002; RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.36, 2.54, P < 0.0001; and RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.21, 2.90, P = 0.005). The rate of drug-resistance was higher in the LDT group than in the ETV group (RR 3.76, 95% CI 1.28, 11.01, P = 0.02). In addition, no severe adverse drug reactions were observed in the two groups. And the rate of increased creatine kinase in the LDT group was higher than in the ETV group (RR 5.58, 95% CI 2.22, 13.98, P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION:LDT and ETV have similar virological and biomedical responses, and both are safe and well tolerated. However, LDT has better serological response and higher drug-resistance.展开更多
OBJECTIVE： To evaluate systematically the clinical efficacy and safety of Qingkailing （QKL） injection in the treatment of acute stroke. METHODS： Searches for randomized controlled trials into acute stroke treated ...OBJECTIVE： To evaluate systematically the clinical efficacy and safety of Qingkailing （QKL） injection in the treatment of acute stroke. METHODS： Searches for randomized controlled trials into acute stroke treated with QKL injection were performed in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wan fang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed and Cochrane Library, from January 1979 to March 2013. Two reviewers independently retrieved the RCTs and extracted the information. The Cochrane risk of bias method was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and a Meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.2 software. RESULTS： A total of 13 studies with 1110 participants were included. The quality of the studies was generally low. The Meta-analysis indicated that the combined use of QKL and Western Medicine was significantly superior to control group therapy in terms of the total effective rate. The relative risk （RR） in the acute cerebral hemorrhage （ACH） sub-group was 1.17 [95% confidence interval （CI） （1.08, 1.26）, P=0.0001]. In the acute cerebral infarction （ACI） sub-group, RR was 1.27 [9.5% CI （1.14, 1.42）, P〈0.0001], and in the ACH and ACI mixed sub-group, RR was 1.34 [95% CI （1.20,1.50）,P〈0.00001]. Additionally, QKL promoted the absorption of hematoma [mean difference （MD）= - 3.73, 95%0 （ - 4.48, - 2.98）, P〈0.000 01], decreased neurological damage in ACI [MD= - 5.60, 95% CI （ - 8.50, - 2.70）, P=0.0002] and ACH [MD= 4.08, 95% CI （ - 8.00, 0.16）, P=0.04], promoted the recovery of awareness [RR=1.56, 95% CI （1.09, 2.21）, P=0.01] and reduced the whole blood viscosity coefficient [MD=- 0.75, 95% CI （ - 1.47, - 0.03）, P=0.04]. There were no adverse drug reactions reported in the included studies. CONCLUSION＂ Based on this systematic review, QKL combined with conventional therapy was effective compared with control treatment. However, because the articles used in the study were not of high quality, further studies should be conducted into the efficacy and safety of QKL in treating acute stroke.展开更多
基金Supported by Drug Research Fund of Hepatitis, Guangdong Pharmaceutical Association, No. 2012G01
文摘AIM:To compare the effects of telbivudine (LDT) and entecavir (ETV) in treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B by meta-analysis. METHODS:We conducted a literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the VIP database, the Wanfang database and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register for all relevant articles published before April 1, 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LDT with ETV for treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B were included. The data was analyzed with Review Manager Software 5.0. We used relative risk (RR) as an effect measure, and reported its 95% CI. Meta-analysis was performed using either a fixedeffect or random-effect model, based on the absence or presence of significant heterogeneity. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and extracted data indepen- dently and in duplicate. The analysis was executed using the main outcome parameters including hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA undetectability, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion, drug-resistance, and adverse reactions. Meta-analysis of the included trials and subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the association between pre-specified characteristics with the therapeutic effects of the two agents. RESULTS:Thirteen eligible trials (3925 patients in total) were included and evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. In various treatment durations of 4 wk, 8 wk, 12 wk, 24 wk, 36 wk, 48 wk, 52 wk, 60 wk and 72 wk, the rates of HBV DNA undetectability and ALT normalization in the two groups were similar, without statistical significance. At 4 wk and 8 wk of the treatment, no statistical differences were found in the rate of HBeAg loss between the two groups, while the rate in the LDT group was higher than in the ETV group at 12 wk, 24 wk, 48 wk and 52 wk, respectively (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.16, 7.03, P = 0.02; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.16, 1.82, P = 0.001; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11, 1.89, P = 0.006; and RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.04, 3.32, P = 0.04). At 4 wk, 8 wk, 60 wk and 72 wk of the treatment, there were no significant differences in the rate of HBeAg seroconversion between the two groups, while at 12 wk, 24 wk, 48 wk and 52 wk, the rate in the LDT group was higher than in the ETV group (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.36, 3.24, P = 0.0008; RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.29, 2.28, P = 0.0002; RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.36, 2.54, P < 0.0001; and RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.21, 2.90, P = 0.005). The rate of drug-resistance was higher in the LDT group than in the ETV group (RR 3.76, 95% CI 1.28, 11.01, P = 0.02). In addition, no severe adverse drug reactions were observed in the two groups. And the rate of increased creatine kinase in the LDT group was higher than in the ETV group (RR 5.58, 95% CI 2.22, 13.98, P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION:LDT and ETV have similar virological and biomedical responses, and both are safe and well tolerated. However, LDT has better serological response and higher drug-resistance.
基金Supported by National Science and Technology Support Program of China (No.2006BAI21B11)Scientific Research Innovation Team Project of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (No.2011-CXTD-14)
文摘OBJECTIVE： To evaluate systematically the clinical efficacy and safety of Qingkailing （QKL） injection in the treatment of acute stroke. METHODS： Searches for randomized controlled trials into acute stroke treated with QKL injection were performed in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wan fang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed and Cochrane Library, from January 1979 to March 2013. Two reviewers independently retrieved the RCTs and extracted the information. The Cochrane risk of bias method was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and a Meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.2 software. RESULTS： A total of 13 studies with 1110 participants were included. The quality of the studies was generally low. The Meta-analysis indicated that the combined use of QKL and Western Medicine was significantly superior to control group therapy in terms of the total effective rate. The relative risk （RR） in the acute cerebral hemorrhage （ACH） sub-group was 1.17 [95% confidence interval （CI） （1.08, 1.26）, P=0.0001]. In the acute cerebral infarction （ACI） sub-group, RR was 1.27 [9.5% CI （1.14, 1.42）, P〈0.0001], and in the ACH and ACI mixed sub-group, RR was 1.34 [95% CI （1.20,1.50）,P〈0.00001]. Additionally, QKL promoted the absorption of hematoma [mean difference （MD）= - 3.73, 95%0 （ - 4.48, - 2.98）, P〈0.000 01], decreased neurological damage in ACI [MD= - 5.60, 95% CI （ - 8.50, - 2.70）, P=0.0002] and ACH [MD= 4.08, 95% CI （ - 8.00, 0.16）, P=0.04], promoted the recovery of awareness [RR=1.56, 95% CI （1.09, 2.21）, P=0.01] and reduced the whole blood viscosity coefficient [MD=- 0.75, 95% CI （ - 1.47, - 0.03）, P=0.04]. There were no adverse drug reactions reported in the included studies. CONCLUSION＂ Based on this systematic review, QKL combined with conventional therapy was effective compared with control treatment. However, because the articles used in the study were not of high quality, further studies should be conducted into the efficacy and safety of QKL in treating acute stroke.
