司法鉴定乱象的法律规制——以文物司法鉴定为例

部分司法鉴定专业不仅鉴定主体杂乱、水平参差不齐,更是可能由于缺乏科学的、统一的客观标准,导致鉴定最终结果的主观性较强,甚至偶发虚假鉴定、违法犯罪等行为。需求量越来越大的文物司法鉴定越来越受到公众的关注,行业内的问题、乱象显现也较多。对于行业内乱象可以从行业本身、法律规范等多重角度进行规制,但刑事法规制无疑是对权利规范最为严格的一环。如何厘清罪与非罪,正确区分虚假鉴定与基于认识错误得出的鉴定意见,也必然是刑事法律规范中的核心要素。

浅谈虚假诉讼案件的成因及预防

在法律意识不断增强的今天，越来越多群众懂得运用法律维护自身的合法权益，但却偏偏有这样的一些人利用人民对法律的信任，制造虚假纠纷的假象，侵害了案外第三方的合法权益，损害了国家司法机关的权威，制造出一起起虚假诉讼案件。本文将从虚假诉讼的现状、成因及相关预防对策方面探讨该如何防范虚假诉讼案件。

Analysis on the Significance of Ancient Chinese Corporal Punishment Reform to the Progress of the Penalty System

Since the ＂five -punishment＂ system was established from the period of the slavery society of the Western Zhou Dynasty, corporal punishment has been always in existence as a tool used by the rulers to punish people in ancient China. Although corporal punishment was abolished in the punishment sentencing reform of Emperor Wen of Han, it was further developed and improved in the penalty system of the Sui and Tang dynasties. However, it was restored in the Song, Liao, Yuan, Ming, and Qing Dynasties, etc. From the studies of the corporal punishment change, the reform law of the penal system in ancient China can be found, and also the significance of ancient Chinese corporal punishment reform to the progress of criminal penalty can be sought. Meanwhile, it is of vital significance to knowing well the development of China＇s legal history and improving the current penal system.

二○○九年本刊栏目组稿方向

2008年,在广大作者、读者的关注、支持下,本刊以科学发展观为指导,求真务实,锐意创新,学术水平不断提高,引用率不断攀升,刊物质量较之2007年又上了一个新的台阶。