The theory of action liberal in cause has a long history. But this concept originally did not exist in our country＇s traditional crinainal law. It has caused widespread controversy and discussion after being introduc...The theory of action liberal in cause has a long history. But this concept originally did not exist in our country＇s traditional crinainal law. It has caused widespread controversy and discussion after being introduced into Chinese academy of criminal law. From researches on various viewpoints about the theory of action liberal in cause in German and Japanese theories of criminal law, this paper discusses problems such as recognition of the form of a crime of action liberal in cause, the basis of straPoarkeit and how to coordinate with criminal law principles like ＂capacity for responsibility coexists with capacity for act＂. In the end, it puts forward the scheme of modification for relevant legislation of action liberal in cause.展开更多
In Germany, Japan and in the Taiwan Region of our country, there is the long-standing debate about the joint negligence crime, and in the mainland of China, there are many scholars having discussed, but because the pr...In Germany, Japan and in the Taiwan Region of our country, there is the long-standing debate about the joint negligence crime, and in the mainland of China, there are many scholars having discussed, but because the provisions on the joint crimes in the criminal law of our country exclude the joint negligence, the relevant discussions are not very sufficient. This paper talks about the views on the relevant issues of the joint negligence crimes, with the provisions on the traffic accident accomplice in the ＂Explanation of several issues concerning the specific application of law in the trial of criminal cases of traffic accidents＂ by the Supreme People＇s Court in 2000 as the starting point, in recognition of the negligent offender, the author further analyzes the constitution of the concept, in order to more clearly define the instigator of the negligent offender.展开更多
This article presents attempts to make a comprehensive study of＂special knowledge＂ and to determine its role in the criminal process and criminology nowadays. The concept of special knowledge and its borders, especi...This article presents attempts to make a comprehensive study of＂special knowledge＂ and to determine its role in the criminal process and criminology nowadays. The concept of special knowledge and its borders, especially the use of its various forms are analyzed. The author considers some controversial provisions in the demarcation of expertise special knowledge from other knowledge （including legal）, and establishes their relationship. The provision for the need to establish certain ＂unification＂ in the use of specialized knowledge, as well as in the appointment and conducting forensic examinations, inviting experts, obtaining advice is made. This also applies to the aspirations of uniform methods, expertise techniques and technology in the application of special knowledge. The use of examination in criminal justice in Ukraine is analyzed and some of the changes associated with the adoption of the new Criminal Procedure Code are considered. The changes in procedures are associated with the desire to transform the traditional regulations and to move to the adversarial criminal process. The necessity of equal procedural opportunities in the use of special knowledge by the prosecution and the defense is argued.展开更多
The nineteenth session of the Standing Committee of the Eleventh National People＇s Congress in February 25, 2011 approved the ＂PRC Criminal Law Amendment （eight）＂, which for the first time added the provision of ...The nineteenth session of the Standing Committee of the Eleventh National People＇s Congress in February 25, 2011 approved the ＂PRC Criminal Law Amendment （eight）＂, which for the first time added the provision of the lenient punishment for the elderly crimes. The provision filled the legislative blank of the criminal responsibility of this special group of the old people in the criminal law of our country. But at the same time, we should also clearly see the deficiencies of the amendment （eight）. This paper attempts to sort out the rationality of the lenient application of the punishment on the older people from the aspect of the criminal policy oftemperingjustice with mercy and other aspects, and to construct and perfect the specific legislative proposals that the amendment （eight） puts forward.展开更多
In order to settle criminal cases promptly and save on judicial resources, using plea bargaining to settle criminal disputes is both an immediate need and a rational choice for China. In the application of plea bargai...In order to settle criminal cases promptly and save on judicial resources, using plea bargaining to settle criminal disputes is both an immediate need and a rational choice for China. In the application of plea bargaining, comprehensive consideration should be given to multiple values, including efficiency, justice, harmony, and tempering severity with leniency, Plea bargaining should be applied in cases that do not involve a felony, should be based on a determination of the nature of the crime, and should be limited to bargaining over penalties. Plea bargaining agreements are entered into by the procurator and the defendant, and do not extend to the judge.展开更多
文摘The theory of action liberal in cause has a long history. But this concept originally did not exist in our country＇s traditional crinainal law. It has caused widespread controversy and discussion after being introduced into Chinese academy of criminal law. From researches on various viewpoints about the theory of action liberal in cause in German and Japanese theories of criminal law, this paper discusses problems such as recognition of the form of a crime of action liberal in cause, the basis of straPoarkeit and how to coordinate with criminal law principles like ＂capacity for responsibility coexists with capacity for act＂. In the end, it puts forward the scheme of modification for relevant legislation of action liberal in cause.
文摘In Germany, Japan and in the Taiwan Region of our country, there is the long-standing debate about the joint negligence crime, and in the mainland of China, there are many scholars having discussed, but because the provisions on the joint crimes in the criminal law of our country exclude the joint negligence, the relevant discussions are not very sufficient. This paper talks about the views on the relevant issues of the joint negligence crimes, with the provisions on the traffic accident accomplice in the ＂Explanation of several issues concerning the specific application of law in the trial of criminal cases of traffic accidents＂ by the Supreme People＇s Court in 2000 as the starting point, in recognition of the negligent offender, the author further analyzes the constitution of the concept, in order to more clearly define the instigator of the negligent offender.
文摘This article presents attempts to make a comprehensive study of＂special knowledge＂ and to determine its role in the criminal process and criminology nowadays. The concept of special knowledge and its borders, especially the use of its various forms are analyzed. The author considers some controversial provisions in the demarcation of expertise special knowledge from other knowledge （including legal）, and establishes their relationship. The provision for the need to establish certain ＂unification＂ in the use of specialized knowledge, as well as in the appointment and conducting forensic examinations, inviting experts, obtaining advice is made. This also applies to the aspirations of uniform methods, expertise techniques and technology in the application of special knowledge. The use of examination in criminal justice in Ukraine is analyzed and some of the changes associated with the adoption of the new Criminal Procedure Code are considered. The changes in procedures are associated with the desire to transform the traditional regulations and to move to the adversarial criminal process. The necessity of equal procedural opportunities in the use of special knowledge by the prosecution and the defense is argued.
文摘The nineteenth session of the Standing Committee of the Eleventh National People＇s Congress in February 25, 2011 approved the ＂PRC Criminal Law Amendment （eight）＂, which for the first time added the provision of the lenient punishment for the elderly crimes. The provision filled the legislative blank of the criminal responsibility of this special group of the old people in the criminal law of our country. But at the same time, we should also clearly see the deficiencies of the amendment （eight）. This paper attempts to sort out the rationality of the lenient application of the punishment on the older people from the aspect of the criminal policy oftemperingjustice with mercy and other aspects, and to construct and perfect the specific legislative proposals that the amendment （eight） puts forward.
基金a phased result of the Program of the National Social Science Fund of China"Research on the Division Mechanism in the Criminal Trial Procedure"(Grant No.:10CFX032)
文摘In order to settle criminal cases promptly and save on judicial resources, using plea bargaining to settle criminal disputes is both an immediate need and a rational choice for China. In the application of plea bargaining, comprehensive consideration should be given to multiple values, including efficiency, justice, harmony, and tempering severity with leniency, Plea bargaining should be applied in cases that do not involve a felony, should be based on a determination of the nature of the crime, and should be limited to bargaining over penalties. Plea bargaining agreements are entered into by the procurator and the defendant, and do not extend to the judge.
