智与吉藏判教思想比较研究

天台宗智与三论宗吉藏的判教思想,是在对南北朝时期各种判教观予以非议之后形成的。这是智与吉藏判教思想共同的学术背景。同一学术背景下,智提出了"五时八教"的判教体系,其判教体系表现出建构性、圆融性与创见性的特点;吉藏则以"二藏三轮"判分经教,批判性、纯粹性与平等性为其判教主张的主要特征。通过对智与吉藏判教思想的对比解读,我们发现,吉藏判教思想中的这些特征或许正是吉藏三论宗衰而不振的原因之一,而深蕴于智判教思想中的诸多特质或许正是智天台宗绵延不绝的内在动力。

藏传佛教格鲁派的判教

藏传佛教各宗派为了树立本派的正统和权威,对佛教经典从形式到内容给予安排和估价,用来确定本宗为佛的最完满说教。格鲁派基于"缘起自性空"的思想理论,对显密经典和教法进行分别,形成了不同于其他宗派的判教思想。

Debate on ＂Evil law is law＂ and ＂Evil law is illegal＂

In the history of the western civilization, the trial of Socrates and the trial of Jesus in the Christian history are equally famous. This trial implied several enduring and classical topics in the history of the western legal thoughts. Why did Socrates accept the results of the ＂Miscarriage of Justice＂？ Who led to the wrong decision？ Why would Socrates be executed？ This article is precisely embarked from this trial, to explore ajurisprudent issue related to the trial： the debate on Evil law is law and Evil law is illegal.