期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
制度功利主义:一个批判性的考察 被引量:3
1
作者 任俊 《哲学分析》 2013年第4期109-119,199,共11页
根据一种实践的规则观,功利原则不能用于辩护特定制度之下的具体行动。将功利原则直接应用于制度本身,提供了一种看起来更为合理的功利主义版本,但这并不意味着它可以免于批判性的考察。制度功利主义有两幅面孔,一种是制度选择的决策程... 根据一种实践的规则观,功利原则不能用于辩护特定制度之下的具体行动。将功利原则直接应用于制度本身,提供了一种看起来更为合理的功利主义版本,但这并不意味着它可以免于批判性的考察。制度功利主义有两幅面孔,一种是制度选择的决策程序,另一种是评价制度是否正义的标准。相应地,它有两种证明方式,分别是诉诸个人理性选择的类比和诉诸道德平等的论证。通过梳理罗尔斯和金里卡等人的讨论,可以看出这两种证明都存在问题。 展开更多
关键词 制度功利主义 决策方式 正义标准
下载PDF
An Utilitarianist Reading of Criminal Law
2
作者 Joao Paulo Orsini Martinelli 《Sociology Study》 2014年第4期348-359,共12页
Utilitarianism is the branch of philosophy that studies the usefulness of an idea. Among the possible gains and losses, the balance must be positive to reach the intended utility. Criminal law is the most repressive b... Utilitarianism is the branch of philosophy that studies the usefulness of an idea. Among the possible gains and losses, the balance must be positive to reach the intended utility. Criminal law is the most repressive branch of legal system and therefore should be applied sparingly by the state. Its usefulness should be the protection of legal interests and minimal restriction of personal liberty. The lawmaker should seek the best way to achieve this utility with the choice of the most relevant legal interests and less repressive means before appealing to the criminal law. The legal interests protected by criminal law must be the most important ones for a social life in harmony and prohibited behaviors must be injurious or dangerous to those legal interests. The Rule of Law does not authorize criminal prohibitions without a minimum limit that allows citizens to behave according to their wishes, provided that does not harm the interests of other people. This is the calculation that legislator, judge, and interpreter should seek: more protection and less restriction to citizens. 展开更多
关键词 UTILITARIANISM legal interests personal liberty PROPORTIONALITY
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部